Macroeconomic sustainability indicators are often applied at the national level. This national-level focus is problematic given the importance of trade in the global economy. This article uses one measure of economic weak sustainability, Genuine Savings, to highlight three issues: (a) the national-level measure is empirically unsound because it does not provide a reliable indicator of weak sustainability for any trade-dependent nation; (b) it is normatively suspect because a nation can be labeled weakly sustainable even when its sustainability derives from the unsustainability of its trade partners; and (c) purported “sustainable” signals can encourage exploitative national policies. This article illustrates these conceptual problems, provides empirical case studies to establish their real-world relevance and importance, and discusses the implications for the indicator’s application.
AndersenL. (1997). A cost–benefit analysis of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).
2.
ArimaE.BarretoP.BritoM. (2006). Cattle ranching in the Amazon: Trends and implications for environmental conservation. Belém, Brazil: Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia. Retrieved from http://www.imazon.org.br/novo2008/arquivosdb/141708ea_5e.pdf
3.
ArrowK. J.BolinB.CostanzaR.DasguptaP.FolkeC.HollingC. S.. . . PimentalD. (1996). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Applications, 6(1), 13-15.
4.
ArrowK. J.DasguptaP.GoulderL.DailyG.EhrlichP.HealG.. . . WalkerB. (2004). Are we consuming too much?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 147-172.
5.
ArrowK. J.DasguptaP.GoulderL.MumfordK.OlesonK. L. L. (2007). China, the U.S., and sustainability: Perspectives based on comprehensive wealth (Stanford Center for International Development Working Paper 313). Retrieved from http://www.ucl.be/cps/ucl/doc/core/documents/Dasgupta.pdf
6.
AsheimG. B. (1997). Adjusting green NNP to measure sustainability. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99, 355-370.
7.
AtkinsonG.HamiltonK. (2002). International trade and the “ecological balance of payments.”Resources Policy, 28(1), 27-37.
8.
AtkinsonG.HamiltonK. (2007). Progress along the path: Evolving issues in the measurement of genuine saving. Environment and Resource Economics, 37, 43-61.
9.
BarrettS. (1994). Trade restrictions in international environmental agreements (CSERGE Working Paper No. 94-13). London, UK: CSERGE.
10.
BehrensA.GiljumS.KovandaJ.NizaS. (2007). The material basis of the global economy: Worldwide patterns of natural resource extraction and their implications for sustainable resource use policies. Ecological Economics, 64, 444-453.
11.
BergerJ. R. (1999). Unilateral trade measures to conserve the world’s living resources: An environmental breakthrough for the GATT In the WTO turtle case. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 24, 355-412.
BrautinghamD. (2009). The dragon’s gift in Africa: The real story of China in Africa. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
BretschgerL. (2005). Economics of technological change and the natural environment: How effective are innovations as a remedy for resource scarcity?Ecological Economics, 54, 148-163.
15.
CharnovitzS. (1994). Environmental trade sanctions and the GATT: An analysis of the Pelly Amendment on foreign environmental practice. American University Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 9, 751-807.
16.
CharnovitzS. (2003). Trade and climate: Potential conflicts and synergies. In CenterPew (Ed.), Beyond Kyoto (pp. 141-164). Arlington, VA: Pew Center Global Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/Trade%20and%20Climate.pdf
17.
ChichilniskyG. (1993). North–South trade and the dynamics of renewable resources. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 4, 219-248.
18.
ChichilniskyG. (1994). North–South trade and the global environment. American Economic Review, 84, 851-874.
19.
ChichilniskyG.HealG.BeltrattiA. (1995). The green golden rule. Economic Letters, 49, 175-179.
20.
CollierP.GunningJ. W. (1999). Why has Africa grown slowly?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3), 3-22.
21.
DailyG. C.SöderqvistT.AniyarS.ArrowK. J.DasguptaP.EhrlichP. R.. . . WalkerB. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289, 395-396.
22.
DasguptaP. (2007). Commentary: The Stern review’s economics of climate change. National Institute Economics Review, 199, 4-7.
23.
DasguptaP.MälerK.-G. (2000). Net national product, wealth, and social well-being. Environment and Development Economics, 5, 69-93.
24.
De SoysaI.NeumayerE. (2005). False prophet, or genuine savior? Assessing the effects of economic openness on sustainable development, 1980-99. International Organization, 59, 731-772.
25.
del Mar RubioM. (2004). The capital gains from trade are not enough: Evidence from the environmental accounts of Venezuela and Mexico. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 1175-1191.
26.
DeSombreE. R.BarkinS. (2002). Turtles and trade: The WTO’s acceptance of environmental trade restrictions. Global Environmental Politics, 2(1), 12-18.
27.
del Carmen Vera DiazM.SchwartzmanS. (2005). Carbon offsets and land use in the Brazilian Amazon. In MoutinhoP.SchwartzmanS. (Eds.), Tropical deforestation and climate change (pp. 93-100). Belem, Brazil: Amazon Institute for Environmental Research.
28.
DietzS.NeumayerE.De SoysaI. (2007). Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving. Environment and Development Economics, 12(1), 33-53.
29.
EkinsP. (1993). “Limits to growth” and “sustainable development”: Grappling with ecological realities. Ecological Economics, 8, 269-288.
30.
EkinsP.FolkeC.CostanzaR. (1994). Trade, environment and development: The issues in perspective. Ecological Economics, 9, 1-12.
31.
FearnsideP. M. (2002). Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 23-38.
32.
FerreiraS.HamiltonK.VincentJ. R. (2008). Comprehensive wealth and future consumption: Accounting for population growth. World Bank Economic Review, 22, 233-248.
33.
FleurbaeyM. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 1029-1075.
34.
GarrodG.WillisK. (1999). Economic valuation of the environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
GiljumS.EisenmengerN. (2004). North–South trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: A biophysical perspective. Journal of Environment and Development, 3, 73-100.
37.
GoldsteinA.PinaudN.ReisenH.ChenX. (2006). The rise of China and India: What’s in it for Africa?Paris, France: OECD.
38.
GoodlandR.DalyH. (1993). Why Northern income growth is not the solution to Southern poverty. Ecological Economics, 8, 85-101.
39.
GrabelI. (2003). Predicting financial crises in developing economies: Astronomy or astrology?Eastern Economic Journal, 29, 243-258.
40.
GullisonR. E.LososE. C. (1993). The role of foreign debt in deforestation in Latin America. Conservation Biology, 7(1), 140-147.
41.
HaabT. C.McConnellK. E. (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: The econometrics of non-market valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
42.
HamiltonK.AtkinsonG. (2006). Wealth, welfare, and sustainability. Cheltingham, UK: Edward Elgar.
43.
HamiltonK.BoltK. (2004). Resource price trends and development prospects. Portuguese Economic Journal, 3, 85-97.
44.
HamiltonK.ClemensM. (1999). Genuine savings rates in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review, 13, 333-356.
45.
HamiltonK.RutaG. (2009). Wealth accounting, exhaustible resources and social welfare. Environment and Resource Economics, 42, 53-64.
46.
HartwickJ. M. (1977). Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review, 66, 272-274.
47.
HartwickJ. M. (1995). Constant consumption paths in open economies with exhaustible resources. Review of International Economics, 3, 275-283.
48.
HornborgA. (2006). Footprints in the cotton fields: The industrial revolution as time-space appropriation and environmental load displacement. Ecological Economics, 59, 74-81.
49.
HornborgA. (2009). Challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50, 237-262.
50.
HoughtonR. A.LawrenceK. T.HacklerJ. L.BrownS. (2001). The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: A comparison of estimates. Global Change Biology, 7, 731-746.
51.
HowseR. (2002). The appellate body rulings in the shrimp/turtle case: A new legal baseline for the trade and environmental debate. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 27, 1-23.
52.
HoyosD. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 69, 1595-1603.
53.
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. (2009). Sistema DITER. Retrieved from http://www.inpe.br/
54.
IshamJ.WoolcockM.PritchettL.BusbyG. (2005). The varieties of resource experience: Natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth. World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 141-174.
55.
JayadevappaR.ChhatreS. (2000). International trade and environmental quality: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32, 175-194.
LeiteC.WeidmannJ. (2002). Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. In AbedG.GuptaS. (Eds.), Governance, corruption, and economic performance (pp. 159-196). Washington, DC: IMF.
59.
LindertP. H.WilliamsonJ. G. (2003). Does globalisation make the world more unequal? In TaylorA. M.WilliamsonJ. G. (Eds.), Globalization in historical perspective (pp. 227-276). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
60.
LopezR. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and the trade liberalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 163-184.
61.
MalhiY.RobertsJ. T.BettsR. A.KilleenT. J.LiW.NobreC. A. (2008). Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science, 319(5860), 169.
62.
MargolisM. (2009). Unprotected resources and voracious world markets: A proof of losses in North–South Trade. Resource and Energy Economics, 31(1), 50-57.
63.
MargulisS. (2003). Causes of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Washington, DC: World Bank.
64.
Martinez-AlierJ. (1993). Distributional obstacles to international environmental policy: The failures at Rio and prospects after Rio. Environmental Values, 2, 97-124.
65.
Martinez-AlierJ. (1995). The environment as a luxury or “too poor to be green”?Ecological Economics, 13(1), 1-10.
66.
Martinez-AlierJ.MundaG.O’NeillJ. (1999). Commensurability and compensability in ecological economics. In O’ConnorM.SpashC. (Eds.), Valuation and the environment: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 37-58). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
MortonD. C.DeFriesR. S.ShimabukuroY. E.AndersonL. O.AraiE.del Bon Espirito-SantoF.. . . MorisetteJ. (2006). Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 14637-14641.
69.
MuradianR.Martinez-AlierJ. (2001). Trade and the environment: From a southern perspective. Ecological Economics, 36, 281-297.
70.
MuradianR.O’ConnorM.Martinez-AlierJ. (2002). Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the “environmental load displacement” of industrialised countries. Ecological Economics, 41, 51-67.
71.
NaylorR.SteinfeldH.FalconW.GallowayJ.SmilV.BradfordE.. . . MooneyH. (2005). Losing the links between livestock and land. Science, 310, 1621-1622.
72.
NepstadD. C.SticklerC. M.AlmeidaO. T. (2006). Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology, 20, 1595-1603.
73.
NeumayerE. (2000). Resource accounting in measures of unsustainability: Challenging the World Bank’s conclusions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15, 257-278.
74.
NeumayerE. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms (2nd ed.). Chelthenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
75.
O’NeillJ. (1997a). Managing without prices: The monetary valuation of biodiversity. Ambio, 26, 546-550.
76.
O’NeillJ. (1997b). Value pluralism, incommensurability, and institutions. In FosterJ. (Ed.), Valuing nature? Ethics, economics, and the environment (pp. 75-88). New York, NY: Routledge.
77.
PearceD. W.AtkinsonG. (1993). Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: An indicator of weak sustainability. Ecological Economics, 8, 103-108.
78.
PetersC. M.GentryA. H.MendelsohnR. O. (1989). Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature, 339, 655-656.
79.
PethigR. (1976). Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage. Journal of Environment Economics and Management, 2, 160-169.
ProopsJ. L.AtkinsonG.SchlotheimB. F.SimonS. (1999). International trade and the sustainability footprint: A practical criterion for its assessment. Ecological Economics, 28(1), 75-97.
82.
ReddingS. (1999). Dynamic comparative advantage and the welfare effects of trade. Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 15-39.
83.
ReisenH. (2007). Is China actually helping improve debt sustainability in Africa? (G24, Policy Brief No. 9). Retrieved from http://www.g24.org/pbno9.pdf
RuffinR. J. (2002). David Ricardo’s discovery of comparative advantage. History of Political Economy, 34, 728-748.
86.
RussiD.Gonzalez-MartinezA. C.Silva-MacherJ. C.GiljumS.Martinez-AlierJ.VallejoM. C. (2008). Material flows in Latin America: A comparative analysis of Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru, 1980-2000. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(5/6), 704-720.
87.
SachsJ. D.WarnerA. M. (1999). The big push, natural resource booms and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 59, 43-76.
88.
SeftonJ. A.WealeM. R. (1996). The net national product and exhaustible resources: The effects of foreign trade. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 21-47.
89.
Soares-FilhoB. S.NepstadD.CurranL.CerqueiraG. C.GarciaR. A.RamosC. A.. . . SchlesingerP. (2006). Modeling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature, 440, 520-523.
90.
SpashC. L. (1993). Economics, ethics, and long-term environmental damages. Environmental Ethics, 15(2), 117-132.
91.
SrinivasanU. T.CareyP. C.HallsteinE.HigginsP. A.KerrA. C.KoteenL. E. (2008). The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1768-1773.
92.
SternN. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. London: U.K. Treasury.
93.
StiglitzJ. E. (2009). GDP fetishism. Economists’ Voice, 6(8), 5-7.
SunsteinC. R. (1993). Incommensurability and valuation in law. Michigan Law Review, 92, 779-862.
96.
TolR. S. J. (2009). The economic effects of climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2), 29-51.
97.
TorrasM. (2000). The total economic value of Amazonian deforestation, 1978-1993. Ecological Economics, 33, 283-297.
98.
TorrasM. (2003). An ecological footprint approach to external debt relief. World Development, 31, 2161-2171.
99.
TullD. M. (2006). China’s engagement in Africa: Scope, significance and consequences. Journal of Modern African Studies, 44, 459-479.
100.
TylerZ. (2007). Saving fisheries on the high seas: The use of trade sanctions to force compliance with multilateral fisheries agreements. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 20, 43-96.
101.
VallejoM. C. (2010). Biophysical structure of the Ecuadorian economy, foreign trade, and policy implications. Ecological Economics, 70, 159-169.
102.
Van den BerghJ. C. J. M.VerbruggenH. (1999). Spatial sustainability, trade, and indicators: An evaluation of the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 29(1), 61-72.
103.
van DijkM. (2009). The new presence of China in Africa. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
104.
VincentJ. R. (1997). Resource depletion and economic sustainability in Malaysia. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 19-37.
105.
VincentJ. R.PanayotouT.HartwickJ. M. (1997). Resource depletion and sustainability in small open economies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 274-286.
106.
WayeV. (2008). Carbon footprints, food miles and the Australian wine industry. Melbourne Journal International Law, 9, 271-300.
107.
WeiszH. (2007). Combining social metabolism and input-output analyses to account for ecologically unequal trade. In HornborgA.McNeillJ. R.Martinez-AlierJ. (Eds.), Rethinking environmental history: World-system history and global environmental change (pp. 289-306). Lantham, MD: Altamira.
108.
WeitzmanM. L. (1997). Sustainability and technical progress. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(1), 1-13.
109.
World Bank. (2006) Where is the wealth of nations?Washington, DC: Author.
World Bank. (2011). The changing wealth of nations. Washington, DC: Author.
112.
ZafarA. (2007). The growing relationship between China and Sub-Saharian Africa: Macroeconomic, trade, investment, and aid Links. World Bank Research Observer, 22(1), 103-130.
