Theoretical and empirical studies have shown that democracy and corruption influence environmental policies. In this article, the authors empirically analyze the relative importance of these determinants of environmental policy. When these variables are jointly included as explanatory variables in a multiple regression analysis, the authors found that corruption stands out as a substantial and significant determinant of environmental policies, while proxies for democracy have an insignificant impact. Nevertheless, democracy could affect environmental policy stringency given that countries with a history of democratic rule tend to be less corrupted. The authors argue that improving environmental quality following increasing income is less probable in developing countries with institutional disarray. Finally, and more optimistically, when considering the results in the context of institutions and growth, the authors conclude that there is scope for reaping a double dividend, when institutional improvements and reductions in corruption induce higher economic growth rates and stricter environmental policies.
Aguilera-Klink, F., & Sánchez-García, J. (2005, June). Environmental degradation as a result of democratic disruption: The case of the Canary Islands. Paper presented at the European Society for Ecological Economics Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
2.
Barro, R. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth,1(1), 1-27.
3.
Callister, D. J. (1999). Corrupt and illegal activities in the forestry sector: Current understandings, and implications for World Bank forest policy. In Forest policy implementation review and strategy development: Analytical studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
4.
Carter, T. S. (1997). The failure of environmental regulation in New York—The role of co-optation, corruption and a co-operative enforcement approach. Crime, Law and Social Change,26, 27-52.
5.
Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test. Economics Letters,85(1), 93-101.
6.
Cole, M. A. (2003). Development, trade, and the environment: How robust is the environmental Kuznets curve?Environment and Development Economics,8, 557-580.
7.
Cole, M. A., & Neumayer, E. (2005). Economic growth and the environment in developing countries: What are the implications of the environmental Kuznets curve? In P. Dauvergne (Ed.),International handbook of environmental politics(pp. 298-318). Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.
8.
Congleton, R. D. (1992). Political-institutions and pollution-control. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), 412-421.
9.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Damania, R. (2002). Environmental controls with corrupt bureaucrats. Environment and Development Economics,7, 407-427.
11.
Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G., & List, J. A. (2003). Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 490-512.
12.
Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roy, S., & Wheeler, D. (1995). Environmental regulation and development: A cross-country empirical analysis (Policy Research Working Paper Series). Washington, DC: World Bank.
13.
Deacon, R. T. (1999). Dictatorship,democracy,and the provision of public goods. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. Oxford, UK, & New York: Blackwell.
15.
Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Ballantine.
16.
Eliste, P., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2002). Environmental regulations, transfers, and trade: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,43(2), 234-250.
17.
Environmental Investigation Agency and Telapak. (2003). Above the law: Corruption, collusion, nepotism and the fate of Indonesia's forests. London, New York, Bogor, Indonesia: Authors.
18.
Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. (2002). Ranking national environmental regulation and performance: A leading indicator of future competitiveness? In M. Porter, J. Sachs, & K. Schwab (Eds.),The global competitiveness report 2001-2002(pp. 78-100). New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and environmental policy: Theory and evidence from the United States. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., Damania, R., & Gates, S. (2005). Environmentalism, democracy, and pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,49(2), 343-365.
21.
Fredriksson, P. G., & Svensson, J. (2003). Political instability, corruption and policy formation: The case of environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics,87(7/8), 1383-1405.
22.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic-growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(2), 353-377.
23.
Harbaugh, W. T., Levinson, A., & Wilson, D. M. (2002). Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Review of Economics and Statistics,84(3), 541-551.
24.
Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of commons. Science,162(3859), 1243-1248.
25.
Hauge, W., & Ellingsen, T. (1998). Beyond environmental scarcity: Causal pathways to conflict. Journal of Peace Research,35(3), 299-317.
26.
Heilbroner, R. L. (1974). An inquiry into the human prospect. New York: Norton.
27.
Hill, K. Q. (2003). Democratization and corruption—Systematic evidence from the American states. American Politics Research,31(6), 613-631.
28.
Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (1995). Transitions to democracy: Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research,32, 469-482.
29.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2004). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002 (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper). Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics,7(3), 207-227.
31.
Landman, T. (2004). Measuring human rights: Principle, practice, and policy. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 906-931.
32.
Lopez, R., & Mitra, S. (2000). Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,40, 137-150.
33.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(3), 681-712.
34.
Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics,69(2), 263-279.
35.
McCloskey, H. J. (1983). Ecological ethics and politics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
36.
McGuire, M. C., & Olson, M. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature,34(1), 72-96.
37.
Meier, G. M. (2001). The old generation of development economists and the new. In G. M. Meier & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.),Frontiers of development economics: The future in perspective(pp. 13-50). Washington, DC, Oxford, UK, & New York: World Bank and Oxford University Press.
38.
Mill, J. S. (1982). On liberty. New York: Viking. (Original work published in 1859)
39.
Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics,29(1), 66-79.
40.
Morse, S., & Fraser, E. D. G. (2005). Making “dirty” nations look clean? The nation state and the problem of selecting and weighting indices as tools for measuring progress towards sustainability. Geoforum,36(5), 625-640.
41.
Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy—Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies,35(1), 5-34.
42.
Neumayer, E. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research,39(2), 139-164.
43.
Paldam, M. (2002). The cross-country pattern of corruption: Economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy,18(2), 215-240.
44.
Payne, R. A. (1995). Freedom and the environment. Journal of Democracy,6(3), 41-55.
45.
Pellegrini, L., & Gerlagh, R. (2004). Corruption's effect on growth and its transmission channels. Kyklos, 57(3), 429-456.
46.
Perkins, R. (2003). Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: A critical assessment and reconstruction. Natural Resources Forum,27(3), 177-188.
47.
Porter, M., Sachs, J., & Schwab, K. (Eds.). (2002). The global competitiveness report 2001-2002. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Robbins, P. (2000). The rotten institution: Corruption in natural resource management. Political Geography,19, 423-443.
49.
Rodriguez, F., Rodrik, D., Hseh, C. T.,&Jones, C. I. (2001). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual,15, 261-324.
50.
Rosenblum, M.-R., & Salehyan, I. (2004). Norms and interests in US asylum enforcement. Journal of Peace Research,41(6), 677-697.
51.
Sandholtz, W., & Koetzle, W. (2000). Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade. International Studies Quarterly,44(1), 31-50.
52.
Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development,32(8), 1419-1439.
53.
Sung, H.-E. (2004). Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change,41, 179-194.
54.
Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics,25(2), 147-160.
55.
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399-457.
56.
Vanhanen, T. (2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 251-265.
57.
Welsch, H. (2004). Corruption, growth, and the environment: A cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Economics,9, 663-693.
58.
Wilson, J. K., & Damania, R. (2005). Corruption, political competition and environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,49(3), 516-535.
