Since the mid-1990s, Cameroon has launched a process of decentralization of the management of its forests. Among other innovations, this decentralization process has transferred powers over forests and financial benefits accruing from their exploitation to local communities. This article explores and profiles such local-level outcomes. It shows that the experiment has not yet brought up expected positive results and very often generates internal conflicts, a new social stratification and the marginalization of traditional authorities. Second, the article argues that decentralized management is not producing positive economic results, as there is no significant economic change in the case study villages. Third, it demonstrates that the experiment is leading to negative environmental results, such as the degradation of many community forests in the forested Cameroon. The author recommends that policy makers, researchers, nongovernmental organizations, and the local communities design a monitoring framework for decentralized management.
Abe’ele, P., Nguenang, G.-M., Eboule Singa, N. A., Eyene Essomba, A., Djeukam, R., & Cuny, P. (2004). Etat des lieux de la foresterie communautaire au Cameroun [A review of community forestry in Cameroon]. Unpublished consultancy report.
2.
Ambara, N. (2003). Cameroun: La délinquance verte gagne du terrain [Green delinquency gains ground]. La Nouvelle Tribune, 85, 6-7.
3.
Assembe, S. (2003). Gouvernance forestière au Cameroun: Parallèles entre l’utilisation des redevances forestières et des revenus de la forêt communautaire dans le cas de Kongo [Forest governance in Cameroon. Parallels between the management of forestry fees and the management of revenue from the community forest in the case of Kongo]. Unpublished research report.
4.
Auzel, P., Nguenang, G.-M., Fetéké, R., & Delvingt, W. (2001). Small-scale logging in community forests in Cameroon: Towards ecologically more sustainable and socially more acceptable compromises (Working Paper No. 25fi). London: Overseas Development Institute.
5.
Barume, A. K. (2004). La Loi Forestière de 1994 et les droits des habitants des forêts au Cameroun [The 1994 Forestry Law and the rights of forests peoples in Cameroon]. Terroirs, 1-2, 107-119.
6.
Bigombé Logo, P. (1994). A qui profite l’exploitation forestière à l’Est-Cameroun? [Who is taking advantage of timber exploitation in East-Cameroon?]. La Voixdu Paysan33, 9-10.
7.
Bigombé Logo, P. (1996). Contestation de l’etat et attestation d’une identité spatiale au Cameroun Méridional Forestier [Protest against the state and attestation of spatial identities in the forested southern Cameroon]. Polis 1, No. Spécial, pp. 3-12.
8.
Bigombé Logo, P. (2003). The decentralized forestry taxation system in Cameroon: Local management and state logic (Working Paper No. 10). Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
9.
Bisséné, Y.-A. (2002). Un député et son partenaire hollandais pillent une forêt communautaire dans le département du Moungo [A parliamentarian and his Dutch partner plunder a community forest in the Moungo Division]. Bubinga, 55, 16.
10.
Bomba, C. M. (2004). Législation forestière et protection des droits des populations locales au Cameroun [The forestry legislation and the protection of the rights of the local peoples in Cameroon]. In P. Bigombé Logo (Ed.), Le retournement de l’etat forestier. L’endroit et l’envers des processus de Gestion Forestière au Cameroun (pp. 243-271). Yaoundé, Cameroon: Presses de l’UCAC.
11.
Brown, D. (2002). Forestry as an entry-point to governance reforms: The case of Cameroon. London: Overseas Development Institute.
12.
Brunner, J., & Ekoko, F. (2000). Cameroon. In F. J. Seymour & N. K. Dubash (Eds.), The right conditions (pp. 59-77). Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
13.
Diaw, M. C., & Njomkap, J.-C. S. (1998). La terre et le droit: Une anthropologie institutionnelle de la tenure coutumière, de la jurisprudence et du droit forestier chez les peuples Bantou et Pygmée du Cameroun Méridional Forestier [The land and the law. An institutional anthropology of customary tenure, jurisprudence and “forestry tenure” among the Bantu and the Pygmies of the forested southern Cameroon]. Unpublished consultancy report.
14.
Djeumo, A. (2001). Développement des forêts communautaires au Cameroun: Genèse, situation actuelle et contraintes [The development of community forests in Cameroon: Origins, current situation and constraints] (Working Paper No. 25b). London: Overseas Development Institute.
15.
Dkamela, G. P., & Oyono, P. R. (2003). Pouvoirs, argent et recomposition sociale chez les Pygmées Baka de l’est—Cameroun [Power, money and social change among the Baka Pygmies in East Cameroon]. AFRICA, 58(3-4), 340-355.
16.
Efoua, S.2002. La gestion des forêts communautaires au Cameroun. Expérience de la région de Lomié [The management of community forests in Cameroon: The experiment of the Lomié region]. Unpublished research report.
17.
Ekoko, F. (1998). The political economy of the 1994 Cameroon Forestry Law (Working Paper No. 3). Yaoundé, Cameroon: Center for International Forestry Research.
18.
Etoungou, P. (2003). Decentralization viewed from inside: The implementation of community forests in East Cameroon (Working Paper No. 12). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
19.
Fongang, G. (2004). Crise économique et retour des migrants: Nouveau paysage du développement rural [Economic crisis and the come back of migrants: New landscape in rural development]. Grain de Sel, 26, 4-5.
20.
Forests Monitor. (2001). Sold down the river (Country profiles—Cameroon). Cambridge, UK: Author.
21.
Gartlan, S. (1992). Cameroon. In J. A. Sayer, C. S. Harcourt, & M. N. Collins (Eds.), The conservation of tropical forests: Africa (pp. 110-117). London: Macmillan.
22.
Guillaume, H. (1989). l’Etat sauvage: Pygmées et forêts d’Afrique Centrale [The wild state: Pygmies and Central Africa forests]. Politique Africaine, 34, 74-80.
23.
Hédin, L. (1930). Etude sur la Forêt et les Bois du Cameroun [A study on Cameroon’s forest and timber]. Paris: Librairie Larose.
24.
Karsenty, A. (1999). Towards the end of the forestry State? Ownership of spaces and the sharing out of forestry incomes in Cameroon. Politique Africaine, 75, 7-12.
25.
Karsenty, A. (2002). Gouvernanceet forêts tropicales: L’exemple du Cameroun [Governance and tropical forests. The case of Cameroon]. Informations et Commentaires, 119, 2-10.
26.
Kassibo, B. (2004). Historical and political foundations for participative management and democratic decentralization in Mali: A synthesis of two case studies (Working Paper No. 16). Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
27.
Klein, M., Salla, B., & Kok, J. (2001). Attempts to establish community forests in Lomié, Cameroon (Working Paper No. 25fii). London: Overseas Development Institute.
28.
Laburthe-Tolra, P. (1981). Les seigneurs de la Forêt. Essai sur le passé historique et les normes ethiques des anciens béti du Cameroun [The lords of the forest. An essay on the historical past and on ethics of the former Béti of Cameroon]. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
29.
Larson, A. M. (2002). Natural resources and decentralization in Nicaragua. Are local governments up to the job?World Development, 30(1), 17-30.
30.
Larson, A. M. (2004, April). Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Paper presented at UNFF Intersessional Workshop on decentralization, Interlaken, Switzerland.
31.
Le Roy, E. (1982). Les objectifs de la colonisation Française ou Belge [The objectives of the French or the Belgian colonization]. In G. A. Kouassigan (Ed.), Encyclopédie juridique de l’Afrique (Tome cinquième: Droit des Biens) (pp. 85-93). Abidjan-Dakar-Lomé: Les Nouvelles Editions Africaines.
32.
Létouzey, R. (1968). Etude phytogéographique du Cameroun. Encyclopédie biologique LXIX [A phytogeographical study of Cameroon. Biological encyclopedia]. Paris: Paul Lechevalier.
33.
Mahwood, P. (1983). Decentralization: The concept and the practice. In P. Mahwood (Eds.), Local government in the third world (pp. 1-22). New York: John Wiley.
34.
Madondo, A., & Mapedza, E. (2003). Allocation of governmental authority and responsibility in tiered governance systems: The case of forest-related laws in Zimbabwe (Working Paper No. 11). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
35.
Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
Mapedza, E., & Madondo, A. (2002). Co-management in the Mafungautsi state forest area of Zimbabwe: What stake for local communities? (Working Paper No. 5). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
37.
Milol, A. C., & Pierre, J.-M. (2001). Impact de la fiscalité décentralisée sur le développement local et les pratiques d’utilisation des resources forestières au Cameroun [The impact of decentralized taxation on local development and practices of forest resources management]. Unpublished study report.
38.
Mimbimi Essono, P. (2004). L’exploitation forestière industrielle à Meyo-Centre (département de la Vallée du Ntem, Sud-Cameroun: Conflits, désillusions et désespoirs [Logging at Meyo-Centre, Vallée du Ntem Division, South-Cameroon)]. In P. Bigombé Logo (Ed.), Le retournement de l’etat forestier. L’endroit et l’envers des Processus de Gestion Forestière au Cameroun (pp. 161-182). Yaoundé, Cameroon: Presses de l’UCAC.
39.
Ministry of Environment and Forests. (2002). Manual of procedures of attribution and of norms of community forests management in Cameroon (2nd ed.). Yaoundé, Cameroon: Author.
40.
Morrow, C. E., & Watts Hull, R. (1996). Donor-institutions: The case of the Yanesha Forestry Cooperative. World Development, 24(10), 1370-1384.
41.
Muhereza, E. F. (2003). Commerce, kings and local government in Uganda: Decentralizing natural resources to consolidate the central state (Working Paper No. 8). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
42.
Mveng, E. (1984). Histoire du Cameroun [The history of Cameroon]. Yaoundé, Cameroon: Centre de Production pour l’Enseignement et la Recherche.
43.
Ndzana Modo, A. (2003). L’or vert des autres [The green gold of the others]. La Nouvelle Tribune, 85, 4-5.
44.
Nguiffo, S. A. (1995, July-August). Le conflit du global et du local dans la gestion des ressources forestières [The conflict between the global and the local in the management of forest resources]. Paper presented at the National Workshop on the management of conflicts related to forest exploitation in Cameroon, Mbalmayo, Cameroon.
45.
Nguiffo, S. A. (2004). La forêt au Cameroun: Richesse et diversité [Forest in Cameroon: Richness and diversity]. Terroirs, 1-2, 91-105.
46.
Oyono, P. R. (1998). Cameroon rainforest: Economic crisis, rural poverty, biodiversity. Local communities in the Lomie region. Ambio, 27(7), 557-559.
47.
Oyono P. R. (2004a). Institutional deficit, representation, and decentralized forest management in Cameroon. Elements of natural resource sociology for social theory and public policy (Working Paper No. 15). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
48.
Oyono, P. R. (2004b). One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resource management decentralization in Cameroon. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(1), 91-111.
49.
Oyono, P. R. (2004c). Social and organizational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon’s forest management decentralization model. European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 174-191.
50.
Oyono, P. R. (2005). From diversity to exclusion for forest minorities in Cameroon. In C. Colfer (Ed.), The equitable forest (pp. 113-130). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
51.
Oyono, P. R. (in press). Notes on the foundations of the conflit de langage over land and forest in Southern Cameroon. African Studies Monographs.
52.
Oyono, P. R., Kouna, C., & Mala, W. (2005). Benefits of forests in Cameroon: Global structure, issues involving access, and decision-making hiccoughs. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(3), 357-368.
53.
Platteau, J.-P. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-drivend evelopment. Development and Change, 35(2), 223-246.
54.
Republic of Cameroon. (1994). Law N° 94/01of January, establishing forestry, wildlife and wildlife regulations. Yaoundé, Cameroon: Imprimerie Nationale.
55.
République du Cameroun. (1995). Décret No. 95/531 du 23 Août 1995 Portant Application du Régime des Forêts [Decree No. 95/531 of August 1995 laying down the implementation of the Forestry Law]. Yaoundé, Cameroon: Imprimerie Nationale.
56.
Ribot, J. C. (2002). African decentralizations: Local actors, powers and accountability (Working Paper No. 8). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
57.
Ribot, J. C. (2003). Democratic decentralization of natural resources. Institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
58.
Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for democracy: The politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
59.
Ribot, J. C., & Oyono, P. R. (in press). Resisting democratic decentralization in Africa: Some state and elite strategies for holding onto power. In B. Wisner & C. Toulmin (Eds.), Toward a new map of Africa. London: Earthscan.
60.
Rice, T., & Counsell, S. (1993). Forest foregone. The European community’s trade in tropical timber and the destruction of the rainforest. London: Friends of the Earth.
61.
Roubaud, F. (1994). Le modèle de développement camerounais 1965-l990: De la croissance harmonieuse à la crise structurelle [The Cameroonian development model. From harmonious growth to structural crisis]. In G. Courade (Ed.), Le village camerounais à l’heure de l’ajustement (pp. 52-72). Paris: Karthala.
62.
Schanz, M. (1914). Le régime forestier dans les colonies allemandes [The forestry regime under the German colonies]. Berlin: Bibliothèque Coloniale Internationale.
63.
Schkopp Von, E. (1913). Zwergvölker in Kamerun [Dwarf peoples in Cameroon]. Globus, 83, 18-21.
64.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65.
Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the State. London: George Allen.
66.
Tötemeyer, G. K. H. (2000). Decentralization for empowerment of local units of governance and society: A critical analysis of the Namibian case. Regional Development Dialogue, 21(1), 95-118.
67.
Verhagen, H., & Enthoven, C. (1993). Logging and conflicts in Cameroon. Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth Netherlands/Netherlands Committee of IUCN.
68.
Wang, X. (1997). Mutual empowerment of state and peasantry: Grassroots democracy in rural China. World Development, 29(29), 1436-1450.
69.
White, F. (1983). The vegetation of Africa: A descriptive memoir to accompany the Unesco/AETFA/UNSO vegetation map of Africa. Paris: Unesco.
70.
Wilkie, D. S. (1988). Hunters and farmers of the African forest. In J. S. Denslow & C. Padoch (Eds.), People of the tropical rainforest (pp. 86-103). Berkeley: University of California Press.
71.
Winterbottom, R. (1992). Tropical forestry action plans and indigenous people: The case of Cameroon. In C. Cleaveret al. (Eds.), Conservation of West and Central African rainforests (pp. 112-119). Washington, DC: World Bank.
