This article describes Brazil's role in the negotiations of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Brazil has a large stake in the climate change issue because some of its national economic, social, and security interests are contingent on the growth of its energy sector and development of the Amazon region. Section one provides an overview of the ongoing climate change negotiations. Section two provides background on Brazil's greenhouse gas emissions, which stem primarily from deforestation of the Amazon. Section three describes Brazil's interests and negotiating positions with respect to three key issues: (a) emissions-reduction responsibilities; (b) protocol mechanisms; and (c) land-use change and forestry. The concluding section will then assess Brazil's contributions in terms of both achieving an accord that will slow global warming and promoting Brazilian national interests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdgerW. N. (1994). Land use and the causes of global warming.New York: Wiley.
AustinD., FaethP., Seroa da MottaR., FerrazC., YoungC.E.F., ZouJ., LiJ., PathakM., SrivastavaL., & SharmaS. (1999). How much sustainable development can we expect from the Clean Development Mechanism?Climate Notes. [Online]. Retrieved April 20, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.wri.org/wri/cdm/pdf
4.
BaglaP. (1998, April 17). Science moves up ladder in push for sustainable growth. Science, 280, 374–375.
5.
BarbosaL. (1993). The “greening” of the ecopolitics of the world-system: Amazonia and changes in the ecopolitics of Brazil. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 21, 107–134.
6.
BarbosaL. (2000). The Brazilian Amazon rainforest: Global ecopolitics, development and democracy.New York: University Press of America.
7.
BinswagerH. P. (1991). Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon. World Development, 19, 821–829.
8.
Brazil loses Hawaii-sized chunk of Amazon. (1999, April 4). Climate News [Online]. Retrieved April 13,1999, from Listserve: elan@csf.colorado.edu
9.
ChristieM. (1997, November 11). Brazil to challenge U.S. over climate treaty. Climate News [Online]. Retrieved November 16,1997, from Listserve: elan@csf.colorado.edu
10.
DasguptaC. (1994). The climate change negotiations. In MintzerI. M. & LeonardJ. A. (Eds.), Negotiating climate change: The inside story of the Rio Convention (pp. 129–148). New York: Cambridge.
11.
Dayrell de LimaA. A. (1996). Environment and globalization: A Brazilian view. [Online]. Retrieved May 12, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br
12.
de FreitasM., & RosaL. P. (1996). Strategies for reducing carbon emissions in the tropical rain forest: The case of the Brazilian Amazon. Energy Conservation Management, 37, 757–762.
13.
The duty of the rich. (1996, July 6). Jornal do Brasil [Online]. Retrieved September 2,1997, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br/clima/kiosko
14.
FearnsideP. M. (1996). Amazonian deforestation and global warming: Carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil's Amazon forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 80, 21–34.
15.
FearnsideP. M. (1999). Forests and global warming mitigation in Brazil: Opportunities in the Brazilian forest sector for responses to global warming under the “Clean Development Mechanism.”Biomass and Bioenergy, 16, 171–189.
16.
Federative Republic of Brazil Ministry of Science and Technology. (1997a). Emissions performance indicators. [Online]. Retrieved October 1, 1997, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br
17.
Federative Republic of Brazil Ministry of Science and Technology. (1997b). Intervention by the Brazilian Delegation Plenary Session, Kyoto, December 5, 1997, under Item 2(f) of the Agenda of COP 3 [Online]. Retrieved May 12, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br
18.
Federative Republic of Brazil Ministry of Science and Technology. (1998). Report on national communication of Brazil [Online]. Retrieved May 12,1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br/clima/ingles/comunic/default.htm
19.
Federative Republic of Brazil Ministry of Science and Technology. (1999). Brazilian views on the clean development mechanism [Online]. Retrieved April 19,2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br/clima/ingles/quioto/dakar.htm
20.
Federative Republic of Brazil National Institute for Space Studies. (2000). Monitoramento da floresta Amazonica Brasileira por satelite, 1998-1999 [Monitoring the Brazilian Amazon Forest by satellite, 1998-1999] [Online]. Retrieved May 2, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.inpe.br/informacoes_eventos/amz1998_1999/index.amz.htm
ForestaR. (1992). Amazonia and the politics of geopolitics. The Geographical Review, 82, 128–142.
23.
GoldembergJ. (1994). The road to Rio. In MintzerI. M. & LeonardJ. A. (Eds.), Negotiating climate change: The inside story of the Rio Convention (pp. 175–185). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GoldembergJ. (1999). Urn “Fast Track” para implementacao do Mecanismo de Desenvolvimento Limpo (CDM) no Brasil [A “fast track” for the implementation of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in Brazil] [Online]. Retrieved September 15, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br/quioto/dakar.htm
25.
GuimaeresR. P. (1991). The ecopolitics of development in the Third World: Politics and environment in Brazil.Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
26.
GuptaJ. (1995). The global environmental facility in North-South context. Environmental Politics, 4, 19–43.
27.
HurrellA. (1991). The politics of Amazon deforestation. Journal of Latin American Studies, 23, 197–215.
28.
International Energy Agency. (1992). Climatechangepolicy initiatives.Geneva: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
29.
JakobsenS. F. (1997). The determinants of the national position of Brazil on climate change: Empirical reflections (CDR Working Paper 97.1) [Online]. Retrieved March 15, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.library@cdr.dk
30.
KeckM. (1991). The international politics of the Brazilian Amazon (Conference Paper Number 63). In Crossing national borders: Invasion or involvement?New York: Columbia University.
31.
KlosekJ. (1998). The destruction of the Brazilian Amazon: An international problem. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 6, 119–157.
32.
KolkA. (1999). The complexities of environmental regulation: the example of the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11, 71–86.
33.
La RovereE. L., LegeyF. L., & MiguezJ.D.G. (1994). Alternative energy strategies for abatement of carbon transmissions in Brazil. Energy Policy, 22, 914–924.
34.
LutzenbergerJ. (1992). Environment and development: The view from Brazil. In MuñozH. (Ed.), Environment and diplomacy in the Americas (pp. 13–18). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
35.
Machado FilhoH. (1999, May 6). Elementos de um protocolo para a Convencão Quadro das Nacões Unidas sobreMudanca do Clima propostos pelo Brasil em reposta ao Mandato de Berlini [Elements of a protocol for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: Brazilian proposals in response to the Berlin Mandate]. Speech presented to Workshop on Flexible Mechanisms, Dakar, Senegal [Online]. Retrieved May 12,1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br.com
36.
MaharD. (1989). Government policies and deforestation in Brazil's Amazon region.Washington, DC: World Bank.
37.
McGeeH., & ZimmermanK. (1990, Summer). The deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon: Law, politics and international cooperation. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 21, 513–550.
38.
Meetings of the Subsidiary Bodies of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2-12 June 1997. (1997, June 1). Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(77) [Online]. Retrieved September 2, 1997, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iisd.ca/linkages/vol12/enb1277e.html
39.
Meira FilhoL. G. (1997, September 11). Joint implementation should be a complement to reductions: not a substitute. Weathervane [Online]. Retrieved October 1,1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.weathervane.rff.org/perspectives
40.
Meira FilhoL. G. (1998, November 6). Intervencão da Delegacão Brasileira sobre o item 5(a)(1) da agenda aprovada na sessão do Orgão Subsidiario de Assessoramento Científico e Tecnológico sobre “Uso da Terra e Florestas.” [Intervention of the Brazilian delegation concerning Item 5(a) of the agenda approved by the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical Assessment, regarding “land use and forests”]. Speech given at The Fourth Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change at its fifth meeting, Buenos Aires [Online]. Retrieved September 15,1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br/clima/negoc/cop4.htm
41.
MoranE. F. (1994). The law, politics and economics of Amazon deforestation. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1, 397–407.
42.
Rainforests for profit: Businesses sell nuts, tourism and carbon storage. (1998, April 19). U.S. News and World Report [Online]. Retrieved April 20, 1998, from Listserve: climate-L@mbnet.mb.ca
43.
RedcliftM. (1994). Sustainable energy policies for the Brazilian Amazon. Energy Policy, 22, 428–431.
44.
ReidW. V., & GoldembergJ. (1997). Are developing countries doing as much as industrialized countries to slow climate change? [Online]. Retrieved February 2, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mct.gov.br
45.
Report of the Third Conference of Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1-11 December, 1997. (1997, December 13). Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(76) [Online]. Retrieved April 28, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iisd.ca/linkages/vol12/enb1276ehtml
46.
Report of the Fourth Conference of Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1998, November 16). Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(97) [Online]. Retrieved September 15,1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iisd.ca/linkages/vol12/enb1297e.html
47.
RomanoC. S. (1998). Brazilian government policies toward the Amazon rain forest: From a developmental ideology to an environmental consciousness?Colorado Journal of International Law and Policy, 9, 65–88.
48.
Rosille-CalleF., & HallD. (1992). Biomass energy, forests and global warming. Energy Policy, 20, 124–136.
49.
SardenbergR. (1999). Statement to the high-level segment on land use, land use change and forestry/sinks for carbon sequestration at the Fifth Conference of Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Earth Negotiations Bulletin [Online]. Retrieved May 22, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://193.159.251.11/cop5/pages/hls_video.phtml?id=11
50.
SchmidtD. (1998, June 28). Coming to grips with the world's greenhouse gases. Science, 281, 504–506.
51.
Seroa da MottaR., & FerrazC. (2000). Financing sustainable development: Part 2. Brazil: CDM opportunities and benefits [Online]. Retrieved on May 15, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http:www.wri.org/cdm/pdf/nsflows_2.pdf
52.
SiegL. (1997, November 10). Delegates say prospects brighten for CO2 treaty. Climate News [Online]. Retrieved November 13, 1997, from Listserve: elan@csf.colorado.edu
53.
Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice. (1999, October 30). Methodological issues: Scientific and methodological aspects of the proposal by Brazil [UN Doc. FCCC/SBSTA/1999/L.13] [Online]. Retrieved April 17, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.unfccc.de/docs/sbsta/1999/l13
54.
Summary of the Sixth Conference of Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2000, November 27). Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12 (163) [Online]. Retrieved January 22, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iisd.ca/vol12/enb12163e.html
TrapassoL. M. (1992). Deforestation of the Amazon: A Brazilian perspective. Geojournal, 26, 311–322.
57.
United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [Online]. Retrieved September 15, 1997, from the World Wide Web: http://www.unfccc.org/resource/docs
58.
United Nations. (1995, June 6). Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties. Decision 1/CP.1: The Berlin Mandate. Report of the conference of parties at its first session held in Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995 [UN Doc. FCCC/CP/1995/7/ADD.1] [Online]. Retrieved November 2, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.unfccc.de/resource/docs/cop1/07a01.pdf
59.
United Nations. (1997a). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [UN Doc. FCCC/CP/1997/7/add.l] [Online]. Retrieved March 15, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.unfccc.de/resource/reports.pdf
60.
United Nations. (1997b). Proposed elements of a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, presented by Brazil in response to the Berlin Mandate [UN Doc. FCCC/AGBM/1997/Misc. 1 and Add. 3] [Online]. Retrieved September 15, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.fccc.de/resource/docs/1997/agbm/misc01a3.htm
61.
United Nations. (1999). Action taken by the conference of parties at its fourth session at Buenos Aires. Decision 7/CP.4. Report of the conference of parties at its fourth session, held at Buenos Aires from 2 to 14 November 1998 [UN Doc. FCCC/CP/19998/16/ADD.l] [Online]. Retrieved May 5, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.unfccc.de/resource/docs/cop4/16a01.pdf
62.
United Nations. (2000). Action taken by the conference of parties at its fifth session. Decision 16/CP.5. Report of the conference of parties on its fifth session, held at Bonn from 25 October to 5 November 1999 [UN Doc. FCCC/CP/1999/6/ADD.l] [Online]. Retrieved March 16, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.unfccc.org/resource/ddcs/cop5/06a01.pdf [pp. 40-41]
63.
ViolaE. J. (1997). The environmental movement in Brazil: Institutionalization, sustainable development and crisis of governance since 1987. In MacDonaldG. J., NielsonD. L., & SternM. A. (Eds.), Latin American environmental policy in international perspective (pp. 88–111). Boulder, CO: Westview.
64.
World Resources Institute. (1996). World resources 1996-97.Washington, DC: World Resources Institute/United Nations Environmental Program/World Bank.
65.
ZirkerD., & HenbergM. (1994). Amazonia, democracy, ecology, and Brazilian military prerogatives in the 1990s. Armed Forces and Society, 20, 259.
