One cannot expect developing countries to have the same environmental standards as developed ones. Standards can be at their efficiency levels and yet lower than in developed countries due to differences in emissions, the pollution absorptive capacity, and the intensity of environmental preferences. However, developing countries can be said to provide a “pollution haven” if their environmental standards are below their efficiency levels or if they fail to enforce their standards in order to attract foreign investment. This article analyses which factors can give rise to pollution havens. The evidence pertaining to pollution havens is reviewed. It is argued that in spite of the rather limited evidence for the existence of pollution havens, it is nevertheless important to evaluate policy options for tackling them. A comprehensive range of options are evaluated according to whether they appear to be effective, politically realistic, development friendly, closed to abuse, and not unnecessarily restrictive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbimanyuA. (1996). Impact of free trade on industrial pollution. Do pollution havens exist?ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 13, 39–51.
2.
AhlanderA. (1994). Environmental problems in the shortage economy: The legacy of Soviet environmental policy.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3.
AlbrechtJ. (1998, July-August). Environmental policy and the inward investment position of US “dirty” industries. Intereconomics, 33, 186–194.
4.
Arden-CIarkeC. (1993). An action agenda for trade policy reform to support sustainable development: A United Nations Conference on Environment and Development follow-up. In ZaelkeD., OrbuchP., & HousmanR. F. (Eds.), Trade and the environment: Law, economics, and policy (pp. 71–81). Washington, DC: Island.
5.
BarrettS. (1994). Strategic environmental policy and international trade. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 325–338.
6.
BartikT. J. (1988). The effects of environmental regulation on business location in the United States. Grmoth and Change, 19, 22–44.
7.
van BeersC., & van den BerghJ.C.J.M. (1997). An empirical multi-country analysis of the impact of environmental regulations on foreign trade flows. Kyklos, 50, 29–46.
8.
BirdsallN., & WheelerD. (1993). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: Where are the pollution havens?Journal of Environment and Development, 2, 137–149.
9.
ChaoC-C., & YuE.S.H. (1997). International capital competition and environmental standards. Southern Economic Journal, 64, 531–541.
10.
DalyH. E. (1993, November). The perils of free trade. Scientific American, 269, 24–29.
11.
DasguptaS., HettigeH., & WheelerD. (1997). What improves environmental performance? Evidence from Mexican industry (Development Research Group Working Paper 1877). Washington, DC: World Bank.
12.
DasguptaS., LaplanteB., & MamingiN. (1997). Capital market responses to environmental performance in developing countries (Policy Research Working Paper 1909). Washington, DC: World Bank.
13.
DasguptaS., ModyA., RoyS., & WheelerD. (1995). Environmental regulation and development: A cross-country empirical analysis (Policy Research Working Paper 1448). Washington, DC: World Bank.
14.
DeSombreE. R. (1995). Baptists and bootleggers for the environment: The origins of United States unilateral sanctions. Journal of Environment and Development, 4, 53–75.
15.
Deutsche Bundesbank. (1994). Kapitalverflechtung mit dem Ausland [International capital links]. Frankfurt: Author.
16.
Deutsche Bundesbank. (1997). Kapitalverflechtung mit dem Ausland [International capital links]. Frankfurt: Author.
17.
Deutsche Bundesbank. (1999). Kapitalverflechtung mit dem Ausland [International capital links]. Frankfurt: Author.
18.
EskelandG. S., & HarrisonA. E. (1997). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis (Working Paper 1744). Washington, DC: World Bank.
19.
Freedom House. (1999). Annual survey of freedom country scores 1972-73 to 1998-99.Washington, DC: Author.
20.
GallupG. H.Jr., GallupA. M., & DunlapR. E. (1993). Health of the planet A George H. Gallup memorial survey.Princeton, NJ: Gallup International Institute.
21.
GentryB. S. (1999). The environmental effects of international portfolio flows (Working Paper ENV/EPOC/GEEI(98)32/FINAL). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22.
HamiltonJ. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 98–113.
23.
HettigeH., HuqM., PargalS., & WheelerD. (1996). Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. World Development, 24, 1891–1904.
24.
InglehartR., BasanezM., & MorenoA. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook—political, religious, sexual, and economic norms in 43 societies: Findings from the 1990-1993 World Values Survey.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. (1999). Report on the WTO's high-level symposium on trade and environment, Geneva, 17-18 March 1999.Geneva: World Trade Organization.
26.
International Institute for Management Development. (1999). World competitiveness yearbook.Lausanne, Switzerland: Author.
27.
International Monetary Fund. (1998). Government finance statistics yearbook.Washington, DC: Author.
28.
KahnM. E. (2000). United States pollution intensive trade trends from 1972 to 1992 (Mimeo). New York: Columbia University.
29.
KellerW., & LevinsonA. (1999). Environmental compliance costs andforeign direct investment inflows to U.S. states (Working Paper 7369). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
KriströmB., & RieraP. (1996). Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 45–55.
31.
LaplanteB., & RilstoneP. (1995). Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry: The case of Quebec (Policy Research Paper 1447). Washington, DC: World Bank.
32.
LeonardJ. H. (1988). Pollution and the struggle for the world product.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
LevinsonA. (1996). Environmental regulations and manufacturers’ location choices: Evidence from the census of manufacturers. Journal of Public Economics, 62, 5–29.
34.
ListJ. A., & CoC. Y. (2000). The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 1–20.
35.
LucasR.E.B., WheelerD., & HettigeH. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution 1960-88 (Working Paper 1062). Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
MabeyN., & McNallyR. (1999). Foreign direct investment and the environment: From pollution havens to sustainable development.Surrey, UK: World Wide Fund for Nature, United Kingdom.
37.
ManiM., PargalS., & HuqM. (1996). Does environmental regulation matter? Determinants of the location of new manufacturing plants in India in 1994 (Policy Research Paper 1718). Washington, DC: World Bank.
38.
ManiM., & WheelerD. (1997). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy 1960-1995 (Background document, OECD Conference on FDI and the Environment, The Hague, 28-29 January 1999). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
39.
MarkusenJ. R., MoreyE. R, & OlewilerN. (1995). Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous. Journal of Public Economics, 56, 55–77.
40.
McConnellV. D., & SchwabR. M. (1990). The impact of environmental regulation on industry location decisions: The motor vehicle industry. Land Economics, 66, 67–81.
41.
NeumayerE. (1999). Multilateral agreement on investment: Lessons for the WTO from the failed OECD negotiations. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 46, 618–628.
42.
NeumayerE. (2000). Trade and the environment: A critical assessment and some constructive suggestions for reconciliation. Journal of Environment and Development, 9, 138–159.
43.
NeumayerE. (in press-a). Do countries fail to raise environmental standards? An evaluation of policy options addressing “regulatory chill.”International Journal of Sustainable Development.
44.
NeumayerE. (in press-b). Do we trust the data? On the validity and reliability of cross-national environmental surveys. Social Science Quarterly.
45.
NeumayerE. (in press-c). Greening investment and trade: Environmental protection without protectionism.London: Earthscan.
46.
OatesW. E., & SchwabR. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?Journal of Public Economics, 35, 333–354.
47.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1996). Pollution abatement and control expenditure in OECD countries.Paris: Author.
49.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). Eco-labelling: Actual effects of selected programmes (Report OCDE/GD(97)105). Paris: Author.
50.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1998). International direct investment statistics yearbook 1998.Paris: Author.
51.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1999). Development cooperation 1998.Paris: Author.
52.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). The OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises.Paris: Author.
53.
PargalS., & ManiM. (2000). Citizen activism, environmental regulation, and the location of industrial plants: Evidence from India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 829–846.
54.
PorterG. (1999). Trade competition and pollution standards: “Race to the bottom” or “stuck at the bottom”?Journal of Environment and Development, 8, 133–151.
55.
RauscherM. (1994). On ecological dumping. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 822–840.
56.
RobertsJ. T. (1996). Predicting participation in environmental treaties: A world-system analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 66, 38–57.
57.
RockM. T. (1996). Pollution intensity of GDP and trade policy: Can the World Bank be wrong?World Development, 24, 471–479.
58.
SandP. H. (Ed.). (1992). The effectiveness of international environmental agreements.Cambridge, UK: Grotius.
59.
SnapeR H. (1992). The environment, international trade and competitiveness. In AndersonK. & BlackhurstR. (Eds.), The greening of world trade issues (pp. 73–92). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
ThompsonP., & StrohmL. A. (1996). Trade and environmental quality: A review of the evidence. Journal of Environment and Development, 5, 363–388.
61.
TobeyJ. A. (1990). The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of world trade: An empirical test. Kyklos, 43, 191–209.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (1998). Bilateral investment treaties in the mid-1990s.New York: Author.
64.
United Nations Development Program. (1995). Human development report.New York: Author.
65.
United Nations Development Program. (1999). Human development report.New York: Author.
66.
United Nations Environment Program and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2000). UNEP-UNCTAD capacity building task force on trade, environment and development (Report WT/CTE/W/138). Geneva: World Trade Organization.
67.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). Pollution abatement costs and expenditures: 1994.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
68.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Trade and environment: Conflicts and opportunities.Washington, DC: Author.
69.
Van LongN., & SiebertH. (1991). Institutional competition versus exante harmonization: The case of environmental policy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 14, 296–311.
70.
WheelerD., & ModyA. (1992). International investment location decisions: The case of U.S. firms. Journal of International Economics, 33, 57–76.
71.
World Bank. (1997). World development indicators.Washington, DC: Author.
72.
World Bank. (1998a). Competitiveness indicators.Washington, DC: Author.
73.
World Bank. (1998b). World development indicators.Washington, DC: Author.
74.
World Bank. (1999). World development indicators.Washington, DC: Author.
75.
World Bank. (2000). Greening industry: New roles for communities, markets, and governments.Washington, DC: Author.
76.
World Economic Forum. (1999). Global competitiveness report.Geneva: Author.
77.
World Trade Organization. (1996). The effects of environmental measures on market access, especially in relation to developing countries, in particular to the least developed among them, note by the secretariat (WT/CTE/W/26). Geneva: Author.
78.
XingY., & KolstadC. D. (1998). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? (Mimeo). Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Economics.
79.
ZarskyL. (1999). Havens, halos and spaghetti: Untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment (Background document, OECD Conference on FDI and the Environment). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
