This article explores the appropriate specification of cross-country econometric analyses of international trade and pollution using data on carbon emissions across 132 countries from 1950 to 1992. A number of prominent studies implicitly rule out pollution shifting across countries by not interacting trade measures with income. Using a more flexible functional form, it is shown in this article that increased trade intensity raises carbon emissions in lower income countries and lowers carbon emissions in upper income countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrasJ., & ChapmanD. (1999). A dynamic approach to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 28, 267–277.
2.
BirdsallN., & WheelerD. (1993). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: Where are the pollution havens?Journal of Environment & Development, 2, 137–149.
3.
BodenT. A., MarlandG., & AndresR. J. (1995). Estimates of global, regional, and national annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning, hydraulic cement production, and gas flaring: 1950-1992.Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
4.
BredahlM. E., BallengerN., DunmoreJ. C., & RoeT. L. (1996). Agriculture, trade, and the environment: Discovering and measuring the critical linkages.Boulder, CO: Westview.
5.
ElisteP., & FredrikssonP. G. (1998). Does open trade result in a race to the bottom? Cross-country evidence.Washington, DC: World Bank.
6.
Energy Information Administration. (1994). Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 1987-1992.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. (DOE/EIA-0573)
GrossmanG. M., & KruegerA. B. (1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In GarberP. (Ed.), The U.S.-Mexico free trade agreement (pp. 13–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
HeilM. T., & SeldenT. M. (1996). GDP growth and CO2 emissions forecasts. In LynchM. (Ed.), (De)regulalion of energy: Intersecting business, economics, and policy (pp. 30–40). Cleveland, OH: U.S. Association for Energy Economics.
10.
HeilM. T., & SeldenT. M. (in press). Carbon emissions and economic development: Future trajectories based on historical experience. Environment and Development Economics.
11.
HeilM. T., & WodonQ. T. (1997). Inequality in CO2 emissions between poor and rich countries. Journal of Environment & Development, 6, 426–452.
12.
Holtz-EakinD., & SeldenT. M. (1995). Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 85–101.
13.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1990). Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment.New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
LowP. (Ed.). (1992). International trade and the environment [World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
15.
LowP., & YeatsA. (1992). Do “dirty” industries migrate? In LowP. (Ed.), International trade and the environment [World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159] (pp. 89–103). Washington, DC: World Bank.
16.
LucasR., WheelerD., & HettigeH. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960-1988. In LowP. (Ed.), International trade and the environment [World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17.
MoomawW. R., & UnruhG. C. (1997). Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 451–463.
18.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). Globalization and environment.Paris: Author.
19.
SchmalenseeR., StokerT. M., & JudsonR. A. (1998). World energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 15–27.
20.
SeldenT. M., & SongD. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147–162.
21.
ShafikN., & BandyopadhyayS. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence [Working Paper WPS 904]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22.
SongD. (1994). Environmental quality, international trade, and economic development: Theory and evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Department of Economics.
23.
SummersR., & HestonA. (1991). The Penn World Tables: An extended set of international comparisons: 1950-1988. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 327–368.
24.
SuriV., & ChapmanD. (1998). Economic growth, trade and energy: Implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25, 195–208.
25.
WheelerD., & MartinP. (1992). Prices, policies, and the international diffusion of clean technology: The case of wood pulp production. In LowP. (Ed.), International trade and the environment [World BankDiscussionPaper No. 159]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
26.
World Resources Institute. (1996). World resources 1996-97: A guide to the global environment.New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
WycoffA. W., & RoopJ. M. (1994). The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: Implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 22(3), 187–194.
