Using data provided by the 1993 International Social Survey Programme, the authors examine the relationship between economic factors, values, and environmental attitudes both at the societal level and the individual level. They tested the hypothesis derived from Inglehart that postmaterialist values mediate the relationship between economics and support for the environment. In a multilevel analysis, they also explored whether the relationship between individuals’ income and their attitudes toward the environment varies as a function of societal-level indicators. Results demonstrate that economic factors predicted proenvironmental attitudes at the societal level and less so at the individual level, but at neither level was the influence of economic factors mediated through postmaterialist values. Further, a society’s recent economic growth, but not current levels of economic development, predicted to what extent individuals’ proenvironmental views were linked to their personal economic resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, P. R.
,& Inglehart, R. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Allison, P. D.
(1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
3.
Baron, R. M.
,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Blocker, T. J.
, & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841-858.
5.
Blumer, H.
(1955). Attitudes and the social act. Social Problems, 3, 59-65.
6.
Brechin, S. R.
(1999). Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 793-809.
7.
Brechin, S. R.
, & Kempton, W. (1994). Global environmentalism: A challenge to the postmaterialism thesis?Social Science Quarterly, 75, 245-269.
8.
Bryk, A. S.
, & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Clark, M. E.
(1995). Changes in Euro-American values needed for sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 63-82.
10.
Clarke, H. D.
, & Dutt, N. (1991). Measuring value change in Western industrialized societies: The impact of unemployment. American Political Science Review, 85, 905-920.
11.
Clarke, H. D.
, Kornberg, A., McIntyre, C., Bauer-Kaase, P., & Kaase, M. (1999). The effect of economic priorities on the measurement of value change: New experimental evidence. American Political Science Review, 93, 637-647.
12.
Cooper, H.
,& Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
13.
Davis, D. W.
, & Davenport, C. (1999). Assessing the validity of the postmaterialism index. American Political Science Review, 93, 649-664.
14.
Diekmann, A.
, & Franzen, A. (1999). The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 31, 540-549.
15.
Dietz, T.
, Stern, P. C.,& Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.
16.
Dunlap, R. E.
, Grieneeks, J. K., & Rokeach, M. (1983). Human values and pro-environmental behavior. In W. D. Conn (Ed.), Energy and material resources: Attitudes, values, and public policy (pp. 145-169). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Dunlap, R. E.
,& Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite?Journal of Social Issues, 51, 121-137.
18.
Guha, R.
, & Martinez-Alier, J. (1997). Varieties of environmentalism: Essays north and south. London: Earthscan.
19.
Hardin, G.
(1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
20.
Helson, H.
(1964). Adaptation level theory. New York: Harper and Row.
21.
Herek, G. M.
(1986). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 99-144.
22.
Hines, J. M.
, Hungerford, H. R.,& Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: Ameta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-18.
23.
Hodgkinson, S. P.
, & Innes, J. M. (2000). The prediction of ecological and environmental belief systems: The differential contributions of social conservatism and beliefs about money. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 285-294.
24.
Inglehart, R.
(1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Inglehart, R.
(1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Inglehart, R.
(1995). Public support for environmental protection: The impact of objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28, 57-71.
27.
Inglehart, R.
(1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Inglehart, R.
, & Abramson, P. R. (1999). Measuring postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, 93, 665-677.
29.
Jackman, R. W.
, & Miller, R. A. (1996). The poverty of political culture. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 697-716.
30.
Jones, R. E.
,& Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?Rural Sociology, 57, 28-47.
31.
Judd, C. M.
,& Kenny, D. A. (1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Kaplan, S.
(2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 491-508.
33.
Karp, D. G.
(1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.
34.
Katz, D.
(1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
35.
Kemmelmeier, M.
(2001). Private self-consciousness moderates the relationship between value orientations and attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 141, 61-74.
36.
Kemmelmeier, M.
, Burnstein, E., Krumov, K., Genkova, P., Kanagawa, C., Hirshberg, M., et al. (2002). Individualism, collectivism and authoritarianism in seven nations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
37.
Kidd, Q.
,& Lee, A.-R. (1997). Postmaterialist values and the environment: A critique and reappraisal. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 1-15.
38.
Lee, A.-R.
,& Kidd, Q. (1997). More on postmaterialist values and environment. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 36-43.
39.
Leff, H. L.
(1978). Experience, environments, and human potentials. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Maslow, A. K.
(1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
41.
Meadows, D. H.
, Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits: Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.
42.
Milbrath, L.
(1996). Learning to think environmentally: While there is still time. Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
Oskamp, S.
, Burkhardt, R., Schultz, P. W., Hurin, S., & Zelezny, L. (1998). Predicting three dimensions of residential curbside recycling: An observational study. Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 37-42.
44.
Runciman, W. C.
(1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
45.
Schultz, P. W.
(2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concerns for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.
46.
Schultz, P. W.
,& Oskamp, S. (1996). Effort as a moderator of the attitudebehavior relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 375-383.
47.
Schultz, P. W.
, & Stone, W. F. (1994). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward the environment. Environment and Behavior, 26, 25-37.
48.
Schultz, P. W.
, & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behavior: A five-country study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558.
49.
Schultz, P. W.
,& Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
50.
Schultz, P. W.
, Zelezny, L.,& Dalrymple, N. J. (2000). A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32, 576-591.
51.
Schwartz, S. H.
(1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
52.
Schwarz, N.
, Wänke, M., & Bless, H. (1994). Subjective assessments and evaluations of change: Some lessons from social cognition research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 181-210). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
53.
Stern, P. C.
, & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
54.
Vining, J.
, & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22, 55-73.
55.
Weigel, R. H.
,& Newman, L. S. (1976). Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 793-802.
56.
Wicker, A. W.
(1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41-78.
57.
Wieczorkowska, G.
, & Burnstein, G. (1999). Adapting to the transition from socialism to capitalism in Poland: The role of screening strategies in social change. Psychological Science, 10, 98-105.
58.
World Bank
. (1994). World development report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
World Bank
. (2000). World development indicators 2000 [CD-ROM]. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Zelezny, L. C.
, Chua, P.-P.,& Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaboration on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443-457.
