Cooperation and Culture: Students From China and the United States in a Prisoner's Dilemma

Abstract

An important question facing those interested in comparative eco nomic systems is how well the assumptions underlying market economic models fit in nonmarket contexts. Does individual eco nomic behavior vary across cultures? The authors brought together Chinese undergraduates and students from an American college to play the classic prisoner's dilemma game. Facing monetary payoffs, each student played the game several times with different partners. A probit analysis is used to examine what influenced the students' decisions to cooperate or defect in each game. The authors found that American students behaved in a more self-interested, less cooperative manner than the Chinese students did in the prisoner's dilemma experiment. They also found that when foreign students studying in the United States are included with the American students to create a sample of students who grew up in a variety of different market economies, these students also behaved in a less cooperative manner than their Chinese counterparts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1483-1536.

Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

Bornstein, G. , Budescu, D. , & Zamir, S. (1997). Cooperation in intergroup, n-person, and two-person games of chicken. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 41(3), 384-406.

Colman, A. (1982). Game theory and experimental games: The study of strategic interaction. Oxford: Pergamon.

Cooper, R. , DeJong D.V. , Forsythe, R. , & Ross, T.W. (1990). Cooperation without reputation. Discussion Paper. Iowa City: University of Iowa, College of Business Administration.

Frank, R.H. , Gilovich T. , & Regan, D.T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159-171.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hemesath, M. (1994, Spring). Cooperate or defect? Russian and American students in a Prisoner's Dilemma. Comparative Economic Studies , 83-93.

Hemesath, M. , & Pomponio, X. (1995). Student attitudes toward markets: Comparative survey data from China, the United States and Russia. China Economic Review, 6(2), 225-238.

10.

Insko, C.A. , Schopler, J. , Graetz, K.A. , Drigotas, S.M. , Currey, D.P. , Smith, S.L. , Brazil, D. , & Bornstein, G. (1994). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(1), 87-116.

11.

Kagel, J. H. , & Roth, A. E. (Eds.). (1995). The handbook of experimental economics . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

Sachs, J. (1993). Poland's jump to the market economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Shiller, R.J. , Boycko, M. , & Korobov, V. (1991). Popular attitudes toward free markets: The Soviet Union and the United States compared. American Economic Review , 81, 385-400.

14.

Shiller, R.J. , Boycko, M. , & Korobov, V. (1992). Hunting for Homo Sovieticus: Situational versus attitudinal factors in economic behavior. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 127-194.

15.

Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Vols. 1 & 2). Oxford, UK: Clarendon. (Original work published in 1776)

16.

Weitzman, M.L. , & Xu, C. (1994). Chinese township-village enterprises as vaguely defined cooperatives. Journal of Comparatiue Economics, 18(2), 121-145.