Five methods are described for estimating missing data in cross-cultural codes. The reliability of these alternative methods is assessed in the context of constructing a scale of total female contributions to agriculture. Simulations are used to explore the potential
effects on scale reliability of larger amounts of missing data in the
same data set. The imputed scales show surprisingly high reliability, even when more than half of the original data points are
missing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Babbie, E.R. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Barry, H., & Schlegel, A. (1982). Cross-cultural codes on contributions by women to subsistence. Ethnology, 21, 165-188.
3.
Baumann, H. (1928). The division of work according to sex in African hoe culture. Africa, 1, 289-319.
4.
Bradley, C. (1989). Reliability and inference in the cross-cultural coding process. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 1, 353-371.
5.
Burton, M.L., Brudner, L.A., & White, D.R. (1977). A model of the sexual division of labor. American Ethnologist, 4, 227-251.
6.
Burton, M.L., Moore, C.C., Whiting, J.W.M., & Romney, A.K. (1996). Regions based on social structure. Current Anthropology, 37(1).
7.
Burton, M.L., & White, D.R. (1984). Sexual division of labor in agriculture. American Anthropologist, 86, 568-583.
8.
Ember, C.R. (1983). The relative decline in women's contribution to agriculture with intensification. American Anthropologist , 85, 285-304.
9.
Ember, C.R., Ross, M.H., Burton, M., & Bradley, C. (1991). Problems of measurement in cross-cultural research using secondary data. Behavior Science Research, 25, 187-216.
10.
Goody, J. (1973). Polygyny, economy and the role of women. In J. Goody (Ed.), The character of kinship (pp. 175-190). London/New York : Cambridge University Press.
11.
Goody, J. (1976). Production and reproduction. London/New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Guyer, J.I. (1980). Female farming and the evolution of food production patterns amongst the Beti of south central Cameroon. Africa , 50, 341-356.
13.
Guyer, J.I. (1984). Naturalism in models of African production. Man, 19, 371-388.
14.
Guyer, J.I. (1988). The multiplication of labor. Current Anthropology, 29, 247-272.
15.
Heath, D.B. (1958). Sexual division of labor and cross-cultural research . Social Forces, 37, 77-79.
16.
Kim, J.O., & Curry, J. (1977). The treatment of missing data in multivariate analyses. Sociological Methods and Research, 6, 215-240.
17.
Kraemer, H.C., & Thiemann, S. (1987). How many subjects?: Statistical power analysis in research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Maraschuilo, L.A., & Levin, J. (1983). Multivariate statistics in the social sciences . Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
Murdock, G.P., & Provost, C. (1973a). Factors in the division of labor by sex. Ethnology, 12, 203-225.
21.
Murdock, G.P., & Provost, C. (1973b). Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology, 12, 379-392.
22.
Romney, A.K. (1989). Quantitative models, science and cumulative knowledge . Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 1, 153-223.
23.
White, D.R., & Burton, M.L. (1988). Causes of polygyny: Ecology, economy, kinship and warfare. American Anthropologist, 90, 871-887.
24.
Whiting, J.W.M. (1981). Environmental constraints on infant care practices . In R. Munroe, L. Munroe, & B. Whiting (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 155-179). New York: Cohen-Garland.
25.
Whyte, M.K. (1978). The status of women in preindustrial societies . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
