Abstract
A review of current, apparently conflicting, general models of social organization in the sociological literature reveals that such models differ along two basic dimensions: 1) primary causal emphasis (cultural or morphological); and 2) major structural focus (on societies, organizations, aggregates, or groups). Eight fundamental kinds of models thus emerge that appear on the whole more com plementary than conflicting and also offer possibilities of combination both in ex tant and novel ways. Our results suggest considerably more general conceptual unity than is often currently attributed to either sociology or cultural anthropology, and thus have particular implications for the pursuit of holocultural comparative research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
