Abstract
In this paper I reconsider the evidence for saying that polygyny has historically been a response to imbalanced sex ratios often brought about by warfare. I suggest refinements and revisions to categories and variables for cross-cultural comparisons involving both demo graphic and social organizational concerns. And I identify problems with coding of census data, and explore the problems associated with the use of dichotomous marriage form variables. An accurate characterization of a society's marriage arrangements must account for both the incidence and intensity of polygyny, as well as its pres ence or absence. Characterizing the involvement of females in poly gynous marriages provides important insight into both historical and contemporary social demographic processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
