Abstract
I examine here how Sumner's concept of the mores applies to modern urban society—in particular to law as an epiphenomenon of the mores rather than an influence on them. Strongly-held mores are rare in contem porary societies. Rather, submores pervade, causing conflict among antag onistic interests. Law can sometimes bridge these submores, as in labor- management conflict. Law can also provide a framework within which pervasive mores may evolve. For these reasons, law can and does contribute much more to the mores of complex urban societies than Sumner perceived.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
