This paper evaluates two alteniative theories of the conditions favoring
matrilocality-one proposed by M. Ember and C. R. Ember and the other
by Dicale. New cross-cultural evidence relating type of warfare to societal
size suggests that warfare is more likely to play a role in determining
residence than vice versa, contrary to Dicale's theory. A new model, taking
Divale's findings into account, is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Divale, William T.1974 "Migration, external warfare and matrilocal residence," Behavior Science Research9: 75-133.
2.
Ember, Melvin, and Carol R. Ember1971 "The conditions favoring matrilocal versus patrilocal residence ," American Anthropologist73: 571-94.
3.
Murdock, George P.1967Ethnographic atlas: a summary, Pittsburgh , University of Pittsburgh Press.
4.
Otterbein, Keith F.1968 "Internal war: a cross-cultural study," American Anthropologist70: 277-89.