This study examined the relationship between independent and interdependent self-construals, as measured by the Self-Construal Scale (SCS), to evaluate the independence of these constructs, and their associations with analytic-holistic thinking (Analysis-Holism Scale; AHS), Big Five personality traits, and subjective well-being across five cultural groups. Participants included 440 individuals from Korea (n = 109), Canada (n = 256; 90 European, 53 East Asian, 113 South Asian), and the United States (n = 75 European Americans). Independent and interdependent self-construals were uncorrelated among Koreans, European Canadians, and European Americans, consistent with theoretical expectations, whereas East Asian and South Asian Canadians showed positive correlations between the two self-construals. Self-construals also exhibited distinct patterns of associations with personality traits and subjective well-being indicators across cultural groups. These findings provide partial support for the theoretical independence of the two dimensions: independence was observed in monocultural groups, whereas a closer association emerged in bicultural groups. Overall, these results underscore the importance of evaluating the cross-cultural applicability of the SCS and AHS and highlight the need for culturally sensitive measurement approaches, particularly for bicultural populations, when assessing individuals’ self-construals.
AllikJ.McCraeR. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260382
2.
AokiS. K.MearnsJ.KurpiusS. (2017). Social anxiety and assertiveness: The role of self-beliefs in Asian Americans and european Americans. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 39(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.39.3.06
3.
BakhchinaA.ApanovichV.ArutyunovaK.AlexandrovY. (2021). Analytic and holistic thinkers: Differences in the dynamics of heart rate complexity when solving a cognitive task in field-dependent and field-independent conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 762225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762225
4.
Benet-MartínezV.HaritatosJ. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x
5.
Benet-MartínezV.LeeF.LeuJ. (2006). Biculturalism and cognitive complexity: Expertise in cultural representations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(4), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106288476
BresnahanM.LevineT.ShearmanS. M.LeeS. Y.ParkC. Y.KiyomiyaT. (2005). A multimethod multitrait validity assessment of self‐construal in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Human Communication Research, 31(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/31.1.33
8.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
9.
ChenC.LeeS.-Y.StevensonH. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
10.
ChoiI.KooM.ChoiJ. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720629856
11.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791
12.
CrossS. E.HardinE. E.Gercek-SwingB. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752
13.
D'AmicoA.ScrimaF. (2016). The Italian validation of Singelis’s self-construal scale (SCS): A short 10-item version shows improved psychometric properties. Current Psychology, 35(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9378-y
14.
DeatonA. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the gallup world poll. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.53
15.
DienerE.DienerM.DienerC. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.851
16.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
17.
DienerE.ScollonC. K.OishiS.DzokotoV.SuhE. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010031813405
18.
DienerE.SuhE. M.SmithH.ShaoL. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur?Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01078966
19.
DuncanE.Grazzani GavazziI. (2004). Positive emotional experiences in Scottish and Italian young adults: A diary study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-0666-8
20.
FernándezI.PaezD.GonzálezJ. L. (2005). Independent and interdependent self-construals and socio-cultural factors in 29 nations. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18(1), 35–63.
21.
GardnerW. L.GabrielS.LeeA. Y. (1999). I value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00162
22.
GermaniA.DelvecchioE.LiJ. B.LisA.Nartova-BochaverS. K.VazsonyiA. T.MazzeschiC. (2021). The link between individualism-collectivism and life satisfaction among emerging adults from four countries. Applied Psychology: Health and WellBeing, 13(2), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12259
23.
GibasD.GiraudT.ConteJ.RubensL.MartinJ. C.IsableuB. (2016). Attempt to validate the self-construal scale in French: Systematic approach and model limitation. European Review of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2016.02.001
24.
GrossmannI.JowhariN. (2018). Cognition and the self: Attempt of an independent close replication of the effects of self-construal priming on spatial memory recall. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 126–130.
25.
GudykunstW. B. (2004). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
26.
GudykunstW. B.MatsumotoY.Ting-ToomeyS.NishidaT.KimK.HeymanS. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
27.
HackmanM. Z.EllisK.JohnsonC. E.StaleyC. (1999). Self‐construal orientation: Validation of an instrument and a study of the relationship to leadership communication style. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370133
28.
HardinE. E.LeongF. T.BhagwatA. A. (2004). Factor structure of the self-construal scale revisited: Implications for the multidimensionality of self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104264125
29.
HashimotoH.YamagishiT. (2013). Two faces of interdependence: Harmony seeking and rejection avoidance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12022
30.
HatanoK.KawamotoT.HiharaS.SugimuraK.IkedaM.TanakaS.NakaharaJ. (2024). Relationship between personality traits and subjective well-being in emerging adulthood: Moderating role of independent and interdependent self-construal. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(7), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01918-z
31.
HeineS. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 881–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696168
32.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.): Sage.
33.
HongY.-y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.-y.Benet-MartínezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709
34.
JiL. J.ZhangZ.NisbettR. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.57
35.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–139): Guilford Press.
36.
KağitçibaşiC. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
37.
KimH.SasakiJ. Y. (2017). Intercultural similarities and differences in personality development. In SpechtJ. (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan. Elsevier.
38.
KimH.SchimmackU.ChengC.WebsterG. D.SpectreA. (2016). The role of positive self-evaluation on cross-cultural differences in well-being. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397115617902
39.
KimH.SchimmackU.OishiS. (2012). Cultural differences in self-and other-evaluations and well-being: A study of European and Asian Canadians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 856–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026803
40.
KimU.TriandisH. C.KâğitçibaşiÇ.ChoiS. C.YoonG. (Eds.), (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Sage Publications.
41.
KitayamaS. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes--Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89
42.
KitayamaS.ParkH.SevincerA. T.KarasawaM.UskulA. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit Independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015999
43.
KitayamaS.SalvadorC. E.NanakdewaK.RossmaierA.San MartinA.SavaniK. (2022). Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the modern west: Toward the globalizing of psychology. American Psychologist, 77(9), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001073
44.
KiuchiA. K. I. (2006). Independent and interdependent self‐construals: Ramifications for a multicultural society. Japanese Psychological Research, 48(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2006.00300.x
45.
KonrathS.BushmanB. J.GroveT. (2009). Seeing my world in a million little pieces: Narcissism, self-construal, and cognitive–perceptual style. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1285–1311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00579.x
46.
KriegA.XuY. (2018). From self-construal to threat appraisal: Understanding cultural differences in social anxiety between Asian Americans and European Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000194
47.
KühnenU.HannoverB.SchubertT. (2001). The self and social identity: The influence of self-construal on information processing and cognitive style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 392–408.
48.
LackoD.ČeněkJ.ArıkanA.DreslerT.GalangA. J.StachoňZ.ŠašinkaČ.TsaiJ. L.ProšekT.UgwitzP.ŠašinkaČ. (2024). Investigating the geography of thought across 11 countries: Cross-cultural differences in analytic and holistic cognitive styles using simple perceptual tasks and reaction time modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001685
49.
LackoD.ČeněkJ.TočíkJ.AvsecA.ĐorđevićV.GencA.SubotićS.Šakotić-KurbalijaJ.MohorićT.NeziriI.SubotićS. (2022). The necessity of testing measurement invariance in cross-cultural research: Potential bias in cross-cultural comparisons with individualism–collectivism self-report scales. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(2-3), 228–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211068971
50.
LackoD.ČeněkJ.UrbánekT. (2021). Psychometric properties of the independent and interdependent self-construal questionnaire: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 564011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.564011
51.
LevineT.BresnahanM.ParkH.LapinskiM.WittenbaumG. M.ShearmanS. M.LeeS. Y.OhashiR. (2003). Self‐construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research, 29(2), 210–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00837.x
52.
LiL. M. W.LiuM.ItoK. (2021). The relationship between the need to belong and nature relatedness: The moderating role of independent self-construal. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 638320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638320
53.
LoR. F.SasakiJ. Y. (2024) (In this issue). Lay Misperceptions of Culture as “Biological” and Suggestions for Reducing Them. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231181139
54.
LucasR. E.DienerE. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. In DienerE. (Ed.), Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 75–100). Springer.
55.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991a). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.2.224
56.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991b). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In StraussJ.GoethalsG. R. (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18–48). Springer.
57.
Martín-FernándezM.ReyL.ExtremeraN. (2022). Shortening the analysis-Holism Scale: Evidence of validity and reliability of the Spanish version. Current Psychology, 41(2), 985–993.
58.
MasudaT.NisbettR. E. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11163–11170. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934527100
59.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Del PilarG. H.RollandJ.-P.ParkerW. D. (1998). Cross-Cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291009
60.
NaJ.GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.GonzalezR.NisbettR. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(14), 6192–6197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001911107
61.
NguyenA.-M. D.Benet-MartínezV. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111435097
62.
NisbettR. E.NorenzayanA. (2002). Culture and cognition. In MedinD. L. (Eds.), Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 561–597). Wiley.
63.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291
64.
NorenzayanA.SmithE. E.KimB. J.NisbettR. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653–684. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_4
65.
OishiS. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.002
66.
OrehekE.SasotaJ.KruglanskiA. W.DechesneM.RidgewayL. (2014). Interdependent self-construals mitigate the fear of death and augment the willingness to become a martyr. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036675
67.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
68.
OysermanD.LeeS. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311
69.
ParkH.AhnJ. (2008). Cultural differences in estimation of other people's self‐construals: Comparison of Korea and USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(3), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2008.00255.x
70.
ParkJ.NorasakkunkitV.KashimaY. (2017). Cross-cultural comparison of self-construal and well-being between Japan and South Korea: The role of self-focused and other-focused relational selves. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01516
71.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
72.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
73.
RyderA. G.AldenL. E.PaulhusD. L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.49
74.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.VignolesV. L.BondM. H.AdamovicM.AkotiaC. S.AlbertI.… ZelenskiJ. M. (2023). Self-construals predict personal life satisfaction with different strengths across societal contexts differing in national wealth and religious heritage. Self and. Identity, 22(5), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2202413
75.
SatoT.McCannD. (1998). Individual differences in relatedness and individuality: An exploration of two constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(6), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00020-8
76.
SchimmackU.OishiS.DienerE. (2005). Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_2
77.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ.McCraeR. R.Benet-MartínezV. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297299
78.
SingelisT. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014
79.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
80.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
81.
Spencer-RodgersJ.WilliamsM. J.PengK. (2010). Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: A decade of empirical research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310362982
82.
SuhE. M. (2000). Self, the hyphen between culture and subjective well-being. In: Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 63–86). MIT Press.
83.
SuhE. M. (2002). Culture, identity, and subjective well-being: Cultural psychological mechanisms of subjective well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 137–152.
84.
TarasV.SaralaR.MuchinskyP.KemmelmeierM.SingelisT. M.AvsecA.SinclairH. C.DinnelD. L.GardnerW.GraceS.HardinE. E.HsuS.JohnsonJ.Karakitapoğlu AygünZ.KashimaE. S.KolstadA.MilfontT. L.OetzelJ.OkazakiS. (2014). Opposite ends of the same stick? Multi-method test of the dimensionality of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 213–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113509132
85.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01
86.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.
87.
UskulA. K.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(25), 8552–8556. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803874105
88.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage Publications.
89.
VarnumM. E.GrossmannI.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301
90.
VignolesV. L.OweE.BeckerM.SmithP. B.EasterbrookM. J.BrownR.GonzálezR.DidierN.CarrascoD.CadenaM. P.LayS.SchwartzS. J.Des RosiersS. E.VillamarJ. A.GavreliucA.ZinkengM.KreuzbauerR.BagumaP.MartinM.BrambillaM. (2016). Beyond the “East-West” dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000175
91.
YamaguchiA.KimM.-S. (2015). Effects of self-construal and its relationship with subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313496448
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
