Mainstream attachment literature has chiefly employed WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) samples, yet cross-cultural studies investigating attachment dynamics outside of Western world corroborated universality of the basic tenets of attachment theory and normativity of attachment security. Importantly, these studies revealed country-level differences in the prevalence of insecure attachment tendencies. Of note, this line of work bears the limitation of reducing culture to country and relying on the individualism versus collectivism dichotomy. The present study offers a novel examination of individual-level links between distinct cultural mindsets and distinct attachment orientations. We investigated two community samples (NTurkey = 368, NUSA = 350) from two diverse cultural contexts by employing an assorted battery of cultural value measures, including both overt and covert measures of cultural indicators. Results revealed distinct relationships between attachment anxiety and the interdependent mindset and attachment avoidance and the independent mindset in both cultural contexts. Findings are discussed in light of cultural implications.
AgishteinP.BrumbaughC. (2013). Cultural variation in adult attachment: The impact of ethnicity, collectivism, and country of origin. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099181
2.
AinsworthM. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
AinsworthM. D. S.MarvinR. S. (1995). On the shaping of attachment theory and research: An interview with Mary D. S. Ainsworth (Fall 1994). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(2/3), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166167
4.
AlperS. (2016). Mastering the chaos by asserting agency: Randomness salience and its effects for different models of agency. Middle East Technical University.
5.
Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IJzendoornM. H. (2009). The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment & Human Development, 11(3), 223–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730902814762
6.
BartholomewK.HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
7.
BelskyJ.SteinbergL.DraperP. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: And evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62(4), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.x
8.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. II. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. III. Loss: Sadness and depression. Basic Books.
10.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment. Basic Books.
11.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press.
12.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. A. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
ChengS.-T.KwanK. W. K. (2008). Attachment dimensions and contingencies of self-worth: The moderating role of culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.003
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
17.
CrossS. E.GoreJ. S. (2012). Cultural models of the self. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 587–616). Guilford.
18.
EğrigözlüE. (2002). Hemşirelerde iş kontrolü, kontrol isteği ile tükenmişlik ve fiziksel sağlık arasındaki ilişkiler [The effects of job control, desirability of control on burnout and physical health. Hacettepe University.
19.
Ein-DorT.ReizerA.ShaverP. R.DotanE. (2012). Standoffish perhaps, but successful as well: Evidence that avoidant attachment can be beneficial in professional tennis and computer science. Journal of Personality, 80(3), 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00747.x
20.
EmmenR. A. G.MaldaM.MesmanJ.EkmekciH.van IJzendoornM. H. (2012). Sensitive parenting as a cross-cultural ideal: Sensitivity beliefs of Dutch, Moroccan, and Turkish mothers in The Netherlands. Attachment & Human Development, 14(6), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.727258
21.
FeeneyJ. A.KarantzasG. C. (2017). Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.017
22.
FriedmanM.RholesW. S.SimpsonJ.BondM.Diaz-LovingR.ChanC. (2010). Attachment avoidance and the cultural fit hypothesis: A cross-cultural investigation. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01256.x
23.
GrossmannK. E.GrossmannK.KepplerA. (2005). Universal and culture-specific aspects of human behavior: The case of attachment. In FriedlmeierW.ChakkarathP.SchwarzB. (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social sciences (pp. 75–97). Psychology Press.
24.
HarmaM.SümerN. (2016). Are avoidant wives and anxious husbands unhappy in a collectivist context? Dyadic associations in established marriages. Journal of Family Studies, 22(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1024711
25.
HesseE. (2016). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 553–597). The Guilford Press.
26.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage publications.
27.
KağıtçıbaşıÇ. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
28.
KamC.ZhouX.ZhangX.HoM. Y. (2012). Examining the dimensionality of self-construals and individualistic–collectivistic values with random intercept item factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.023
29.
KunceL. J.ShaverP. R. (1994). An attachment-theoretical approach to caregiving in romantic relationships. In BartholomewB.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 205–237). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
30.
LeeS.SawangS. (2016). Unpacking the impact of attachment to project teams on boundary-spanning behaviors. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.003
31.
LeyendeckerB.LambM. E.SchölmerichA.FrickeD. M. (1997). Contexts as moderators of observed interactions: A study of Costa Rican mothers and infants from differing socioeconomic backgrounds. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502597384965
32.
LockeK. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6
33.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224
34.
MesmanJ.van IJzendoornM. H.Sagi-SchwartzA. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852–877). Guilford Press.
35.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.PeregD. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024515519160
36.
MorlingB.FiskeS. T. (1999). Defining and measuring harmony control. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(4), 379–414. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2254
37.
OysermanD. (2011). Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 164–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.627187
38.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
39.
ÖzenA.SümerN.DemirM. (2011). Predicting friendship quality with rejection sensitivity and attachment security. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510380607
40.
PosadaG.CarbonellO. A.AlzateG.PlataS. J. (2004). Through Colombian lenses: Ethnographic and conventional analyses of maternal care and their associations with secure base behavior. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.508
41.
PosadaG.GaoY.WuF.PosadaR.TasconM.SchöelmerichA.SagiA.Kondo-IkemuraK.HaalandW.SynnevaagB.SchoelmerichA. (1995). The secure-base phenomenon across cultures: Children’s behavior, mothers’ preferences, and experts’ concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(2/3), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166169
42.
PosadaG.JacobsA.RichmondM. K.CarbonellO. A.AlzateG.BustamanteM. R.QuicenoJ. (2002). Maternal caregiving and infant security in two cultures. Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.1.67
43.
PosadaG.LuT.TrumbellJ.KaloustianG.TrudelM.PlataS. J.PeñaP. P.PerezJ.TerenoS.DugravierR.CoppolaG.ConstantiniA.CassibbaR.Kondo-IkemuraK.NóblegaM.HayaI. M.PedraglioC.VerissimoM.SantosA. J.LayK.-L. (2013). Is the secure base phenomenon evident here, there, and anywhere? A cross-cultural study of child behavior and experts’ definitions. Child Development, 84(6), 1896–1905. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12084
44.
RothbaumF.WeiszJ.PottM.MiyakeK.MorelliG. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.10.1093
45.
SagiA.Van IJzendoornM. H.Koren-KarieN. (1991). Primary appraisal of the strange situation: A cross-cultural analysis of preseparation episodes. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.587
46.
SchmittD. P.AlcalayL.AllensworthM.AllikJ.AultL.AustersI.BennettK. L.BianchiG.BoholstF.CunenM. A. B.BraeckmanJ.BrainerdE. G.CaralL. G. A.CaronG.CasulloM. M.CunninghamM.DaiboI.De BackerC.De SouzaE.ZupanÈiÈA. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(4), 367–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104266105
47.
SchwartzS. H.BoehnkeK. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00069-2
48.
SelcukE.GünaydinG.SumerN.HarmaM.SalmanS.HazanC.DogruyolB.OzturkA. (2010). Self-reported romantic attachment style predicts everyday maternal caregiving behavior at home. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.007
49.
SingelisT. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014
50.
SingelisT. M.TriandisH. C.BhawukD. P. S.GelfandM. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
51.
SorensenN.OysermanD. (2010). Collectivism, effects on relationships. In ReisH. T.SprecherS. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Relationships (pp. 233–236). Sage.
52.
SümerN. (2006). Yetişkin bağlanma ölçeklerinin kategoriler ve boyutlar düzeyinde karşılaştırılması [Categorical and dimensional comparison of the adult attachment measures]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi [Turkish Journal of Psychology], 21(57), 1–22.
53.
SümerN. (2014). Attachment and parenting in developmental and cultural context. 14th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence, Çeşme, İzmir, Turkey.
54.
SümerN.KağıtçıbaşıÇ. (2010). Culturally relevant parenting predictors of attachment security: Perspectives from Turkey. In ErdmanP.NgK.-M. (Eds.), Attachment: Expanding the cultural connections (pp. 157–180). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
55.
Ting-ToomeyS.ChungL. C. (2005). Understanding intercultural communication. Oxford University Press.
van IJzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J. (2010). Invariance of adult attachment across gender, age, culture, and socioeconomic status?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360908
58.
van IJzendoornM. H.KroonenbergP. M. (1988). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: A meta-analysis of the strange situation. Child Development, 59(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130396
59.
WastiS. A.Eser ErdilS. (2007). Bireycilik ve toplulukçuluk değerlerinin ölçülmesi: Benlik kurgusu ve INDCOL ölçeklerinin Türkçe geçerlemesi [Measurement of individualism and collectivism: Validation of Self Construal Scale and INDCOL in Turkish]. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Management Research], 7(1–2), 39–66.
60.
YouH. S.Malley-MorrisonK. (2000). Young adult attachment styles and intimate relationships with close friends: A cross-cultural study of Koreans and Caucasian Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031004006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
