Historical cultural practices that no longer exist can have modern day effects. Because communism has been linked with distrust of government, it was hypothesized that (a) historical communism would be negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccination rates, and (b) trust in government would mediate the association. Two studies assessed these hypotheses. Study 1 tested the hypotheses among European, Asian, and African countries, while Study 2 focused on East and West Germany within Europe. All samples except Africa found support for an association between historical communism and lower COVID-19 vaccination rates. However, trust in government did not mediate the association in Study 1, though a significant indirect effect did emerge within Germany in Study 2. Associations held controlling for GDP and age of population. Together, the studies suggest that historical communism in Europe and Asia is associated with real-world behavior today, and that trust in government might be partly responsible for the effect within Germany but less likely within Europe as a whole.
AzarovaA.IrdamD.GugushviliA.FazekasM.ScheiringG.HorvatP.SteflerD.KolesnikovaI.PopovV.SzelenyiI.StucklerD.MarmotM.MurphyM.McKeeM.BobakM.KingL. (2017). The effect of rapid privatisation on mortality in mono-industrial towns in post-Soviet Russia: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 2(5), e231–e238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30072-5
2.
BasakP.AbirT.Al MamunA.ZainolN. R.KhanamM.HaqueM. R.MiltonA. H.AghoK. E. (2022). A global study on the correlates of Gross domestic Product (GDP) and COVID-19 vaccine distribution. Vaccines, 10(2), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020266
3.
BerniellI.FawazY.LaferrèreA.MiraP.PronkinaE. (2021). SHARE working paper series 75-2021: The COVID-19 curtain: Can past communist regimes explain the vaccination divide in Europe?MPG.PuRe. https://doi.org/10.17617/2.3351839
BishA.YardleyL.NicollA.MichieS. (2011). Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: A systematic review. Vaccine, 29(38), 6472–6484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107
6.
BlairR. A.MorseB. S.TsaiL. L. (2017). Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia. Social Science & Medicine, 172, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.016
7.
BollykyT. J.HullandE. N.BarberR. M.CollinsJ. K.KiernanS.MosesM.PigottD. M.ReinerR. C.JrSorensenR. J. D.AbbafatiC.AdolphC.AllorantA.AmlagJ. O.AravkinA. Y.Bang-JensenB.CarterA.CastellanoR.CastroE.ChakrabartiS.CombsJ. L. (2022). Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: An exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021. Lancet, 399(10334), 1489–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6
8.
CastroM. C.SingerB. (2021). Prioritizing COVID-19 vaccination by age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103700118
Costa-FontJ.Garcia-HonbradosJ.NicinskaA. (2021). The institutional origins of vaccine distrust: Evidence from former-communist countries.Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-400867/v1
11.
de MeloM. (2001). Circumstance and choice: The role of initial conditions and policies in transition economies. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.1.1
DjankovS.NikolovaE.ZilinskyJ. (2016). The happiness gap in Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.10.006
15.
EpperlyB. (2019). The myth of the post-communist citizen: Communist legacies and political trust. Social Science History, 43(02), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.5
16.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 47(6), 1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
17.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
KerrJ. R.SchneiderC. R.RecchiaG.DryhurstS.SahlinU.DufouilC.ArwidsonP.FreemanA. L.van der LindenS. (2021). Correlates of intended COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across time and countries: Results from a series of cross-sectional surveys. BMJ Open, 11(8), e048025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048025
20.
KievitR. A.FrankenhuisW. E.WaldorpL. J.BorsboomD. (2013). Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: A practical guide. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513
21.
LazarusJ. V.RatzanS. C.PalayewA.GostinL. O.LarsonH. J.RabinK.KimballS.El-MohandesA. (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature Medicine, 27(2), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9
22.
Le VineV. T. (2004). Politics in francophone Africa. Lynne Rienner.
Massinga LoembéM.NkengasongJ. N. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine access in Africa: Global distribution, vaccine platforms, and challenges ahead. Immunity, 54(7), 1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.017
25.
MathieuE.RitchieH.Ortiz-OspinaE.RoserM.HasellJ.AppelC.GiattinoC.Rodés-GuiraoL. (2021). A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 947–953. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8
26.
NunnN.WantchekonL. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3221–3252. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3221
27.
ObschonkaM.StuetzerM.RentfrowP. J.Shaw-TaylorL.SatchellM.SilbereisenR. K.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2018). In the shadow of coal: How large-scale industries contributed to present-day regional differences in personality and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 903–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000175
Poethko-MüllerC.SchmitzR. (2013). Impfstatus von Erwachsenen in deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 56(5–6), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1693-6
33.
Pop-ElechesG.TuckerJ. A. (2013). Associated with the past?East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 27(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325412465087
RutjensB. T.SenguptaN.der LeeR.van KoningsbruggenG. M.MartensJ. P.RabeloA.SuttonR. M. (2022). Science skepticism across 24 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001329
38.
SchmelzK. (2021). Enforcement may crowd out voluntary support for COVID-19 policies, especially where trust in government is weak and in a liberal society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1), Article e2016385118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016385118
SprengholzP.BetschC.BöhmR. (2021). Reactance revisited: Consequences of mandatory and scarce vaccination in the case of COVID‐19. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(4), 986–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12285
41.
SturgisP.Brunton-SmithI.JacksonJ. (2021). Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1528–1534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7
42.
TalhelmT.EnglishA. S. (2020). Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(33), 19816–19824. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909909117
43.
van der WeerdW.TimmermansD. R.BeaujeanD. J.OudhoffJ.van SteenbergenJ. E. (2011). Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 575. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-575
