The Mediating Role of Self-Enhancement Value on the Relationship of Power Distance and Individualism with Pro-Environmental Attitudes: Evidence from Multilevel Mediation Analysis with 52 Societies

Abstract

National culture shapes people’s pro-environmental tendencies, yet its underlying psychological mechanisms are less clear. This study examined the mediating role of self-enhancement value on the relationship between culture and pro-environmental attitude. Using data from the World Values Survey (Wave 6; 78,542 participants from 52 countries/regions), we conducted multilevel mediation analyses. At the country level, we found that self-enhancement value fully mediated the relationships of power distance and individualism-collectivism with pro-environmental attitude, measured by evaluating the importance of looking after the environment. However, when this attitude was measured by weighting the priority of environmental protection versus economic development, the mediation effect became non-significant, while both power distance and individualism predicted the prioritization of economic development. These findings were robust despite whether two cultural dimensions were separately or simultaneously analyzed and whether societal macroeconomic conditions were controlled. In the mediation models, power distance positively predicted self-enhancement value; unexpectedly, individualism negatively predicted self-enhancement value and self-enhancement value positively predicted the importance of looking after the environment. Overall, this study highlights that both self-enhancement value and pro-environmental attitude are culturally embedded and call for further studies on clarifying mechanisms underlying the link for cultural effects on individuals’ pro-environmental attitude.

Keywords

power distance individualism-collectivism self-enhancement value pro-environmental attitude multilevel mediation analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Basabe

Ros

(2005). Cultural dimensions and social behavior correlates: Individualism-Collectivism and Power Distance. International Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 189–225.

Bauer

D. J.

Preacher

K. J.

Gil

K. M.

(2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142.

Boer

Fischer

(2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1113–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347.

Bond

M. H.

Lun

V. M.-C.

(2014). Citizen-making: The role of national goals for socializing children. Social Science Research, 44, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.11.002.

Carmi

Arnon

(2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society & Natural Resources, 27(12), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.928393.

Chan

H.-W.

(2020). When do values promote pro-environmental behaviors? Multilevel evidence on the self-expression hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101361.

de Groot

J. I. M.

Steg

(2008). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior. Environment and behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831.

Deng

Walker

G. J.

Swinnerton

(2006). A comparison of environmental values and attitudes between Chinese in Canada and Anglo-Canadians. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505278458.

Easterling

D. R.

Kunkel

K. E.

Wehner

M. F.

Sun

(2016). Detection and attribution of climate extremes in the observed record. Weather and Climate Extremes, 11, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2016.01.001.

10.

Filimonau

Matute

Mika

Faracik

(2018). National culture as a driver of pro-environmental attitudes and behavioural intentions in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(10), 1804–1825. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1511722.

11.

Gahan

Abeysekera

(2009). What shapes an individual’s work values? An integrated model of the relationship between work values, national culture and self-construal. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802528524.

12.

Hespanhol

Vallio

C. S.

Costa

L. M.

Saragiotto

B. T.

(2019). Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 23(4), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.006

13.

Hofstede

(1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/258280.

14.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. https://10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5.

15.

Holtschlag

Morales

C. E.

Masuda

A. D.

Maydeu-Olivares

(2013). Complementary person-culture values fit and hierarchical career status. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.004.

16.

Hornsey

M. J.

Greenaway

K. H.

Harris

E. A.

Bain

P. G.

(2019). Exploring cultural differences in the extent to which people perceive and desire control. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218780692.

17.

Inglehart

Haerpfer

Moreno

Welzel

Kizilova

Diez-Medrano

Lagos

Norris

Ponarin

Puranen

, et al. (2014). World Values Survey: Round six - country-pooled data file. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp.

18.

Joireman

J. A.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

Van Vugt

(2004). Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars?. Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251476.

19.

Karp

D. G.

(1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596281006.

20.

Komatsu

Rappleye

Silova

(2019). Culture and the independent self: Obstacles to environmental sustainability?. Anthropocene, 26, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100198.

21.

Leung

Rice

(2002). Comparison of Chinese-Australian and Anglo-Australian environmental attitudes and behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.3.251.

22.

L. M. W.

W.-Q

Mei

Ito

(2021). Dialectical versus linear thinking shapes people’s anticipation of climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 4073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.623591.

23.

L. M. W.

Masuda

Jiang

(2016). Influence of cultural meaning system and socioeconomic change on indecisiveness in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116631824.

24.

L. M. W.

Mei

W.-Q.

Lee

(2020). The Relationship Between Dialectical Beliefs and Proenvironmental Behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 52(3), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518799821.

25.

Lou

L. M. W.

(2021). The relationship between identity and environmental concern: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101653.

26.

Mace

G. M.

Barrett

Burgess

N. D.

Cornell

S. E.

Freeman

Grooten

Purvis

(2018). Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nature Sustainability, 1(9), 448–451. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0130-0.

27.

Makowski

Ben-Shachar

M. S.

Chen

S. H. A.

Lüdecke

(2019). Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767.

28.

Qiao

Gan

Yang

Zhao

Qiao

Hou

(2020). Promoting sustainable development: The impact of differences in cultural values on residents’ pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1539–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2103.

29.

Milfont

T. L.

Gouveia

V. V.

(2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001.

30.

Miller

R.L.

(2013). Individualist/collectivist-success motivation. In Keith

K.D.

(Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp291.

31.

Minkov

Dutt

Schachner

Morales

Sanchez

Jandosova

Khassenbekov

Mudd

(2017). A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0197.

32.

Minkov

Kaasa

(2021). A test of the Revised Minkov-Hofstede Model of Culture: Mirror images of subjective and objective culture across nations and the 50 US states (pp. 1–52). Cross-Cultural Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211014468.

33.

Muthén

(2010). Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/IntroBayesVersion%203.pdf.

34.

Muthén

L.K.

Muthén

B.O.

(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th edtion). Muthén & Muthén.

35.

Nagy

Konyha Molnárné

(2018). The effects of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on pro-environmental behaviour: How culture influences environmentally conscious behaviour. Theory, Methodology, Practice, 14(1), 27–36.

36.

Oishi

Schimmack

Diener

Suh

E. M.

(1998). The measurement of values and individualism-collectivism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1177–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982411005.

37.

Preacher

K. J.

Zyphur

M. J.

Zhang

(2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141.

38.

Rauwald

K. S.

Moore

C. F.

(2002). Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three countries. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 709–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237243.

39.

Sagie

Elizur

Yamauchi

(1996). The structure and strength of achievement motivation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(5), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199609)17:5<431::AID-JOB771>3.0.CO;2-X.

40.

Sagiv

Sverdlik

Schwarz

(2011). To compete or to cooperate? Values’ impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.729.

41.

Schultz

P. W.

Gouveia

V. V.

Cameron

L. D.

Tankha

Schmuck

Franěk

(2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962.

42.

Schultz

P. W.

Zelezny

(2003). Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American values. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 126–136.

43.

Schwartz

(2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357.

44.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.

45.

Stern

P. C.

Dietz

(1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.

46.

Tam

K.-P.

Chan

H.-W.

(2017). Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001.

47.

Tam

K.-P.

Chan

H.-W.

(2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001.

48.

Tam

K.-P.

Milfont

T. L.

(2020). Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101474.

49.

Taras

Steel

Kirkman

B. L.

(2012). Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstede's dimensions. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.001.

50.

Triandis

H. C.

(1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27(3–4), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719302700301

51.

Welzel

(2013). Freedom rising. Cambridge University Press.

52.

Wesley Schultz

(2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.

53.

Yuan

MacKinnon

D. P.

(2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016972.

54.

Zheng

Guo

Luo

Pan

Hertwich

Jin

Wang

(2021). Individualism and nationally determined contributions to climate change. The Science of the Total Environment, 777, 146076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146076.