To what extent are cultural syndromes invariant within nations or can we identify within-cultural variability in structure and endorsement of cultural syndromes? These questions are central to a) recent discussions around the relevance of nation-states in cultural vs. geographical psychology and b) explorations of how cultural syndromes described in anthropological research are endorsed by individuals within and across regions within the country. We report data on Brazilian jeitinho, an informal problem-solving strategy that is central to Brazilian culture but may show within-cultural variability as suggested in previous anthropological and sociological research. Using a large online sample (N = 1259) we found evidence of full score equivalence for two multi-dimensional jeitinho measures across the most populous Brazilian regions, suggesting that respondents interpret the instruments similarly. Second, we found no practically meaningful mean differences: jeitinho was endorsed equally across all regions of the country. Finally, we found some small but consistent associations with demographic variables, notably gender, age, and education differences. We need to pay greater attention to behavioral functionality at individual level—the social position of individuals within the system rather than geographical boundaries.
AcevedoA. M.HerreraC.ShenhavS.YimI. S.CamposB. (2020). Measurement of a Latino cultural value: The simpatía scale. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 26(4), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000324.
2.
AkaliyskiP.WelzelC.BondM. H.MinkovM. (2021). On “Nationology”: The gravitational field of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(8–9), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211044780.
3.
AlmeidaA. C. de. (2007). A cabeça do brasileiro [The head of Brazilian]. Record.
4.
BaltarF.BrunetI. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960.
5.
BarbosaL. (2006). O Jeitinho Brasileiro: A arte de ser mais igual do que os outros. Campus.
6.
BarrosoL. R. (2020). Sem data venia: Um Olhar Sobre o Brasil e o Mundo. História Real.
7.
BiernackiP.WaldorfD. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205.
BrowneK. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non‐heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663.
10.
ChiuC.-Y.GelfandM. J.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective Perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375562.
11.
DaMattaR. (1979). Carnavais, malandros e heróis: Para uma sociologia do dilema brasileiro [Carnivals, malandros and heroes: For a sociology of the Brazilian dilemma. Rocco.
12.
DiasP. R. P. D. S. M. (2020). O sertão e o sertanejo: um Brasil de vários sertões. Revista Científica Novas Configurações – Diálogos Plurais, 1(1), 4–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/2675-4177.2020.002.
13.
EysenbachG. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.
14.
FerreiraM. C.FischerR.PortoJ. B.PilatiR.MilfontT. L. (2012). Unraveling the mystery of Brazilian Jeitinho: A cultural exploration of social norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427148.
15.
FischerR.FerreiraM. C.MilfontT. L.PilatiR. (2014). Culture of corruption? The effects of Priming corruption images in a high corruption context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1594–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114548874.
16.
FischerR.FerreiraM. C.van MeursN.GokK.JiangD.Y.FontaineJ.HarbC.CieciuchJ.AchouiM.MendozaS.HassanA.AchmadiD.MogajiA.AbubakarA. (2019). Does organizational formalization facilitate voice and helping organizational citizenship behavior? It depends on (national) uncertainty norms. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0132-6.
17.
FischerR.SchwartzS. (2011). Whence differences in value priorities?: Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1127–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381429.
18.
HofstedeG.Garibaldi de HilalA. V.MalvezziS.TanureB.VinkenH. (2010). Comparing regional cultures within a country: Lessons from Brazil. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109359696.
LenartowiczT.RothK. (2001). Does subculture within a country matter? A cross-cultural study of motivational domains and business Performance in Brazil. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490954.
21.
MilfontT. L.ThomsonR.YukiM. (2020). Does relational mobility vary across national regions? A within-country examination. Plos One, 15(7), e0235172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235172.
22.
MinkovM.HofstedeG. (2011). Is national culture a meaningful concept?Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions. Cross-Cultural Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111427262.
23.
MiuraM. A.PilatiR.MilfontT. L.FerreiraM. C.FischerR. (2019). Between simpatia and malandragem: Brazilian jeitinho as an individual difference variable. Plos One, 14(4), e0214929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214929.
24.
MorrisM. W.HongY.-y.ChiuC.-y.LiuZ. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001.
25.
NishiokaS. A.AkolD. (2019). Jeitinho as a coping strategy used by Brazilian international students for acculturative stress. Journal of International Students, 9(3), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v0i0.675.
PetersonM. F.SøndergaardM.KaraA. (2018). Traversing cultural boundaries in IB: The complex relationships between explicit country and implicit cultural group boundaries at multiple levels. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0082-z.
28.
PilatiR.MilfontT. L.FerreiraM. C.PortoJ. B.FischerR. (2011). Brazilian jeitinho: Understanding and explaining an indigenous psychological construct. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 29–38.
ResendeM. M.PortoJ. B. (2020). Brazilian jeitinho and moral identity: Impact on ethical behaviour at work. Trends in Psychology, 28(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.9788/s43076-019-00006-1.
31.
RibeiroD. (1995). O povo brasileiro: A formação e o sentido do brasil. Global.
32.
SmithP. B.HuangH. J.HarbC.TorresC. (2012a). How distinctive are indigenous ways of achieving influence? A comparative study of guanxi, wasta, jeitinho, and “Pulling strings.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381430.
33.
SmithP. B.TorresC.LeongC.-H.BudhwarP.AchouiM.LebedevaN. (2012b). Are indigenous approaches to achieving influence in business organizations distinctive? A comparative study of guanxi, wasta, jeitinho, svyazi and pulling strings. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561232.
34.
TorresC. V.PortoJ. B.VargasL. M.FischerR. (2015). A meta-Analysis of basic human values in Brazil: Observed differences within the country. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 15(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2015.1.356.
35.
TriandisH. C.MarínG.LisanskyJ.BetancourtH. (1984). Simpatía as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1363–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1363.
36.
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences Versus strategies as explanations for culture-Specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
