Innovation constitutes a key factor for the economy and the competitiveness of societies. Using the Hofstede model of national culture, previous studies investigated the influence of different cultural dimensions on national-level innovation. These studies provided for mixed evidence regarding the influence and weight of each cultural dimension in innovation. By considering possible explanations for these inconsistent results, the present study (N = 106 countries) showed that only two cultural dimensions seem to be consistently associated with innovation. Cultures that view change as necessary (long-term oriented) and are more accepting of norm violations (displaying low uncertainty avoidance) tend to promote innovation. These results shed new light on the way cultural tightness and social regulation processes can affect innovative behaviors.
AmabileT. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
2.
AndersonN.PotočnikK.ZhouJ. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
3.
AndersonS. F.KelleyK.MaxwellS. E. (2017). Sample-size planning for more accurate statistical power: A method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1547–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617723724.
4.
AndrijauskienėM.DumčiuvienėD. (2017). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and national innovation level. DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic MeetingSveučilište U Dubrovniku, 3(1), 189–205.
5.
BianchiE. C. (2016). American individualism rises and falls with the economy: Cross-temporal evidence that individualism declines when the economy falters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000114
BonettoE.PichotN.PavaniJ.-B.Adam-TroïanJ. (2020). Creative individuals are social risk-takers: Relationships between creativity, social risk-taking and fear of negative evaluations. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 7(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0016
BucklesK.HungermanD.LugauerS. (2021). Is fertility a leading economic indicator?The Economic Journal, 131(634), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa068
10.
ChaubeyA.SahooC. K.KhatriN. (2019). Relationship of transformational leadership with employee creativity and organizational innovation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(4), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0075
11.
ChenY.PodolskiE. J.VeeraraghavanM. (2017). National culture and corporate innovation. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 43(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.04.006
12.
ChirumboloA.LiviS.MannettiL.PierroA.KruglanskiA. W. (2004). Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.518
DamenF. W.LuningP. A.PellegriniN.VitaglioneP.HofstedeG. J.FoglianoV.SteenbekkersB. L. (2020). Mothers’ considerations in snack choice for their children: Differences between the North and the South of Italy. Food Quality and Preference, 103965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103965.
15.
DamenF. W. M.HofstedeG. J.SteenbekkersB. L. P. A.VitaglioneP.PellegriniN.FoglianoV.LuningP. A. (2019). Values and value conflicts in snack providing of Dutch, Polish, Indonesian and Italian mothers. Food Research International, 115, 554-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.047.
16.
de MooijM.BeniflahJ. (2017). Measuring cross-cultural differences of ethnic groups within nations: Convergence or divergence of cultural values? The case of the United States. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1227758
17.
DuttaS.LanvinB.Wunsch-VincentS. (2014). The global innovation index 2014. WIPO.
18.
DuttaS.ReynosoR.E.LitnerJ.LanvinB.Wunsch-VincentS.SaxenaK. (2016). The global innovation index 2016: Winning with global innovation. In DuttaS.LanvinB.Wunsch-VincentS. (Eds), The Global Innovation Index: Winning with Global Innovation (pp. 3–48). INSEAD and WIPO. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2016-report
FloridaR. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.
21.
Gallego-ÁlvarezI.Pucheta-MartínezM. C. (2021). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: A view from different institutional contexts. Eurasian Business Review, 11(2), 191–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00168-4
22.
GelfandM. J.NishiiL. H.RaverJ. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225
23.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.AycanZ.BoehnkeK.BoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D’AmatoA.FerrerM.FischlmayrI. C.YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
24.
HarringtonJ. R.GelfandM. J. (2014). Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
27.
HofstedeG. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733682
28.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
29.
HofstedeG. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
30.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed., Vol. 3). Citeseer.
31.
HusslerC. (2004). Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe: new perspectives for innovation and convergence policies?Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000234302
32.
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657288
JacksonJ. C.GelfandM.EmberC. R. (2020). A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1930), 20201036. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1036
35.
KaasaA. (2017). Culture and innovation: Evidence from the European union and neighbouring countries. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12194
36.
KaasaA.VadiM. (2010). How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590902987222
37.
KashimaY. (2010). Culture. In LevineJ. M.HoggM. A. (Eds), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 176–181). Sage.
MadjarN.OldhamG. R.PrattM. G. (2002). There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069309
41.
MinkovM. (2018). A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: Old evidence and new data from 56 countries. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2017-0033
42.
MinkovM.KaasaA. (2020). A test of Hofstede's model of culture following his own approach. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. ahead-of-printhttps://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-05-2020-0120
43.
MuY.KitayamaS.HanS.GelfandM. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50), 15348–15353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112
44.
MuthukrishnaM.BellA. V.HenrichJ.CurtinC. M.GedranovichA.McInerneyJ.ThueB. (2020). Beyond western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological ScienceAdvance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
45.
PrimA. L.FilhoL. S.ZamurG. A. C.Di SerioL. C. (2017). The relationship between national culture dimensions and degree of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), 1730001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961730001X
SabriO.HakimT.ZailaB. (2020). The role of hofstede dimensions on the readiness of IOT implementation case study: Saudi universities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(16), 1–12.
SyedH.MalikA.N. (2014). Comparative study of effect of culture on technology adoption in Pakistan and USA. The Business and Management Review, 5(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12160
53.
WaartsE.Van EverdingenY. (2005). The influence of national culture on the adoption status of innovations:. European Management Journal, 23(6), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.007
54.
WeinbergerV. P.QuiñinaoC.MarquetP. A. (2017). Innovation and the growth of human population. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1735), 20160415. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0415
55.
WellsG. L.WindschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512005
