Most cross-cultural studies unintentionally give the impression that there is intracultural homogeneity. This research is among a few that suggests otherwise, that there is intracultural and transcultural individual heterogeneity in thinking and logic, or “Mindscape.” It is a replication and an expansion of the earlier study. It intends to verify the existence of intracultural heterogeneity in support of mindscape theory. In doing so, it employs a unique way of data collection and analysis. The analysis of data that were collected from six countries not only supports the earlier findings but also points to the existence of intracultural and transcultural heterogeneity of individuals.
AuK. Y. (2000). Intra-cultural variation as another construct of international management: A study based on secondary data of 42 countries. Journal of International Management, 6, 217-238.
2.
AuK. Y.CheungM. W. L. (2004). Intra-cultural variation and job autonomy in 42 countries. Organization Studies, 25, 1339-1362.
3.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162-166.
4.
BlashfieldR. (1976). Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 377-388.
5.
BockP. K. (1988). Rethinking psychological anthropology: Continuity and change in the study of human action. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
6.
BouldingK. E. (1956). General systems theory-the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197-208.
7.
BrewerP.VenaikS. (2012). On the misuse of national culture dimensions. International Marketing Review, 29, 673-683.
8.
BrocknerJ. (2005). Unpacking country effects: On the need to operationalize the psychological determinants of cross-national differences. In StawB. M.SuttonR. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 335-369). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
CaleyM.SawadaD. (2000). Mindscape, creativity and ecosophy. The Trumpeter, 16(1), 1-9.
10.
CaprarD. V.DevinneyT. M.KirkmanB. L.CaligiuriP. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring culture in international business and management: From challenges to potential solutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 1011-1027.
11.
DouglasM. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London, England: Berrie and Rockliff.
12.
DouglasM. (1982). Essays in the sociology of perception. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
ErvinS.BowerR. T. (1952). Translation problems in international surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 16, 595-604.
14.
FatehiK.KediaB. L.PriestleyJ. L. (2015). Mindscapes and individual heterogeneity within and between cultures. Journal of Business Research, 68, 291-298
15.
FatehiK.TateU. (2014). A psychological perspective on cultural difference: Epistemological heterogeneity and individual heterogeneity across cultures. European Scientific Journal, 10(8), 267-286.
16.
FeingoldA. (1994). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Sex Roles, 30, 81-92.
17.
FiskeS. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299-322.
18.
GammackJ. (2002). Mindscape and internet-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 7(3), 1-19.
19.
GeflandM. J.ErezM.AycanZ. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. In PosnerM. J.RothbartM. K. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 58, pp. 479-514).
20.
GerhartB.FangM. (2005). National culture and human resource management: Assumptions and evidence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 971-986.
21.
GilovichT.KeltnerD.NisbettR. E. (2010). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
22.
HallE. T. (1959). The silent language. New York, NY: Doubleday.
23.
HarveyO. J. (1966). System structure, flexibility and creativity. In HarveyO. J. (Ed.), Experience structure & adaptability (pp. 39-65). New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
24.
HarzingA. W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research a 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243-266.
25.
HentschelU.SumbadzeN. (2002). Individual differences in mindscapes and attitudes: An exploratory cross-cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 213-222.
26.
HofstedeG. (1980). Cultures consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
HofstedeG. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
HofstedeG. (2002). Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations, 55, 1355-1361.
29.
HofstedeG.BondM. H.LukC. L. (1993). Individual perceptions of organizational cultures: A methodological treatise on levels of analysis. Organization Studies, 14, 483-503.
30.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J. (2004). Research design. In HouseR.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations (pp. 95-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
InkelesA.LevinsonD. J. (1969). National character: The study of modal personality and sociocultural systems. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 418-506). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954).
33.
KatzD.BralyK. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280-290.
34.
KatzH. C. (2005). The causes and consequences of increased within-country variance in employment practices. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43, 577-583.
35.
KirkmanB. L.ChenG.FarhJ.-L.ChenZ. X.LoweK. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744-764.
36.
KirkmanB. L.LoweK. B.GibsonC. B. (2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285-320.
37.
KluckhohnF. R.StrodtbeckF. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Oxford, UK: Row, Peterson.
38.
KuhnM. H.McPartlandT. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68-76.
39.
LippmannW. (1922, October25). The mental age of Americans. New Republic, 32, 213-215.
40.
MaddenC. S.EasleyR. W.DunnM. G. (1995). How journal editors view replication research. Journal of Advertising, 24(4), 77-87.
41.
MaruyamaM. (1961). Multilateral mutual causal relationships among the modes of communication, socio-metric pattern and intellectual orientation in the Danish culture. Phylon, 22, 41-58.
42.
MaruyamaM. (1980). Mindscape and science theories. Current Anthropology, 21, 589-608.
43.
MaruyamaM. (1981, October). Denkmuster: Metaprinzipien der umweltgestaltung. Garten Und Landschaft [Landscape architecture + planning], 806-815.
44.
MaruyamaM. (1982). Mindscapes, management, business policy and public policy. Academy of Management Review, 7, 612-619.
45.
MaruyamaM. (1992a). Anti-monopoly law to prevent dominance by one theory in academic departments. Human Systems Management, 11, 219-220.
46.
MaruyamaM. (1992b). Changing dimensions in international business. Academy of Management Executive, 6(3), 88-96.
47.
MaruyamaM. (1992c). Entropy, beauty and eumorphy. Cybernetica, 35, 195-206.
48.
MaruyamaM. (1993). Mindscapes: Individuals and cultures in management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 140-155.
49.
MaruyamaM. (1994a). Mindscapes in management: Use of individual differences in multicultural management. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
50.
MaruyamaM. (1994b). Psychological tests for epistemological heterogeneity across cultures. Communication and Cognition, 27, 277-396.
51.
MaruyamaM. (1995). Individual epistemological heterogeneity across cultures and its use in organizations. Cybernetica, 37, 215-249.
52.
MaruyamaM. (1999). Heterogram analysis: Where the assumption of normal distribution is illogical. Human Systems Management, 18, 53-60.
53.
MaruyamaM. (2007). Extension of Sartre’s philosophy for today’s world situation. International Review of Sociology, 17, 429-441.
54.
MaruyamaM.ZankovskyA.FatehiK. (1998). Criteria of beauty regarding spatial patterns in four cultures. Paper presented at The XIV International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology International Congress. Billingham, WA: USA.
55.
McCauleyC.StittC. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929-940.
56.
McCauleyC.StittC. L.SegalM. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195-208.
57.
McSweeneyB. (2002a). The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, 55, 1363-1372.
58.
McSweeneyB. (2002b). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89-118.
59.
McSweeneyB. (2013). Fashion founded on a flaw: The ecological mono-deterministic fallacy of Hofstede, GLOBE, and followers. International Marketing Review, 30, 483-504.
60.
MeyerK. E.van WitteloostuijnA.BeugelsdijkS. (2017). What is in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 535-551.
61.
MinkovM.HofstedeG. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede’s doctrine. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 10-20.
62.
MoreyL.BlashfieldR.SkinnerH. (1983). Comparison of cluster analysis techniques within a sequential validation framework. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 309-329.
63.
NoeE.AlroeH. F.LangvadA. M. S. (2005). A semiotic poly-ocular framework for multidisciplinary research in relation to multifunctional farming and rural development (Working paper 3), Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Agro-ecology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.
64.
NoeE.AlroeH. F.LangvadA. M. S. (2008). A poly-ocular framework for research on multifunctional farming and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 1-15.
65.
OslandJ. S.BirdA. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sense-making in context. The Academy of Management Executive, 14, 65-79.
66.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
67.
PadgettL. (1970). Mimsy were the Borogoves. In SilverberegR. (Ed.), Science fiction hall of fame (Vol. 1). Garden City, NY: Doubleday. (Inc. P. 196. Lewis Padgett was a pseudonym employed by Henry Kuttner and his wife, C. L. Moore. Original work published 1943.)
68.
PalichL. E.HomP. W.GriffethR. W. (1995). Managing in the international contest: Testing the cultural generality of sources of commitment to multinational enterprises. Journal of Management, 21, 671-690.
69.
ParsonsT.ShillsE. (1951). Toward a theory of social action: Theoretical foundation for the social sciences. New York, NY: Haroer Torchbook.
70.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
71.
PetersonM. F.BarretoT. S. (2014). The like it or not proposition: Implications of societal characteristics for the cultural expertise and personal values of organization members. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 1134-1152.
72.
PodsakoffP.MacKenzieS.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
73.
PopperK. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
74.
PunjG.StewartD. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 134-148.
75.
SchmidtS. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90-100.
76.
SchneiderD. J. (2005). The psychology of stereotyping. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
77.
SivakumarK.NakataC. (2001). The stampede toward Hofstede’s framework: Avoiding the sample design pit in cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 555-574.
78.
SperberA. D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126, S124-S128.
79.
SteelP.TarasV. (2010). Culture as a consequence: A multi-level multivariate meta-analysis of the effects of individual and country characteristics on work-related cultural values. Journal of International Management, 16, 211-233.
80.
ThompsonE. R.PhuaF. T. (2005). Are national cultural traits applicable to senior firm managers?British Journal of Management, 16, 59-68.
81.
ThompsonM.WildavskyA. (1986). A cultural theory of information bias in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 23, 273-286.
82.
TrompenaarsF.Hampden-TurnerC. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
83.
TsangE. W.KwanK. M. (1999). Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 759-780.
84.
TungR. (2008). The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 41-46.
85.
TungR. L.VerbekeA. (2010). Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1259-1274.
86.
TusiA. S.NifadkarS. S.OuA. Y. (2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33, 426-478.
87.
VenaikS.BrewerP. (2010). Avoiding uncertainty in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1294-1315.
88.
VenaikS.MidgleyD. F. (2015). Mindscapes across landscapes: Archetypes of transnational and subnational culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 1051-1079.
89.
WallaceA. F. C. (1970). Culture and personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
90.
WilliamsK. Y.O’ReillyC. A. I. (1988). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In StawB. A.CummingsI. I. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
91.
YollesM.FinkG. (2009). Migrating personality theories, Part 2: Toward a theory of the balanced personality. Kebernetes, 38, 1461-1490.
