This article addresses the following research questions: Do respondents participating in cross-cultural surveys differ in their response style when responding to attitude statements? If so, are characteristics of the response process associated with their ethnicity and generation of immigration? To answer these questions we conducted a mixed method study. Quantitative analysis of a large representative sample of minorities in the Netherlands shows that cross-cultural differences in responding can partly be explained by a differential response style. These differences in response style turn out to be related to the generation of immigration, both in the representative sample and in a purposively selected qualitative sample of persons of the same four cultural groups. Analysis of cognitive interviews reveals that respondents use three types of response strategies to overcome difficulties of responding to items in a cross-cultural survey. These response strategies are also related to a respondent’s generation of immigration.
BachmanJ. G.O’MalleyP. M. (1984). Yea-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes: Black-White differences in response styles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491-509. doi:10.1086/26884510.1086/268845
2.
BaumgartnerH.SteenkampJ. B. E. M. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 143-156. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.1884010.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840
3.
BelsonW. A. (1986). The validity in survey research. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
4.
BerryJ. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. Understanding individuals moving between cultures. In BrislinR. W. (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 232-253). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
BillietJ. B.McClendonM. J. (2000). Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 608-628. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_510.1207/S15328007SEM0704_5
6.
BlessH.SchwarzN.BodenhausenG. V.ThielL. (2001). Personalized versus generalized benefits of stereotype disconfirmation: Trade-ofs in the evaluation of atypical exemplars and their social groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 386-397. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.145910.1006/jesp.2000.1459
7.
BondM. H.YangK. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation: The variable impact of questionnaire language on Chinese bilinguals from Hong Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 169-185. doi:10.1177/002200218201300200310.1177/0022002182013002003
8.
BradburnN. M.RipsL. J.ShevellS. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science, 236, 157-161. doi:10.1126/science.356349410.1126/science.3563494
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 187-212. doi:10.1177/002202210003100200310.1177/0022022100031002003
11.
DagevosJ.GijsbertsM.Van PraagC. (2003). Rapportage minderheden 2003. Onderwijs, arbeid en sociaal-culturele integratie [Ethnic minorities report 2003. Education, employment and social-cultural integration]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
12.
DavisR. E.ResnicowK.CouperM. P. (2011). Survey response styles, acculturation, and culture among sample of Mexicans American adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1219-1236. doi:10.1177/002202211038331710.1177/0022022110383317
13.
GibbonsJ. L.ZellnerJ. A.RudekD. J. (1999). Effects of language and meaningfulness on the use of extreme response style by Spanish-English bilinguals. Cross-Cultural Research, 33, 369-381. doi:10.1177/10693971990330040410.1177/106939719903300404
HarzingA. W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243-266. doi:10.1177/147059580606633210.1177/1470595806066332
16.
HarzingA. W.MaznevskiM. (2002). The interaction between language and culture: A test of the cultural accomodation hypothesis in seven countries. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 120-139. doi:10.1080/1470847020866808110.1080/14708470208668081
17.
HipplerH. J.SchwarzN. (1987). Response effects in surveys. In HipplerH. J.SchwarzN.SudmanS. (Eds.), Social information processing and survey methodology (pp. 102-122). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag
18.
HuiH. C.&TriandisH. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296-309. doi:10.1177/002202218920300410.1177/0022022189203004
19.
JohnsonT. P.KulesaP.ChoY. I.ShavittS. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 264-277. doi:10.1177/002202210427290510.1177/0022022104272905
20.
JohnsonT. P.ShavittS.HolbrookA. L. (2011). Survey response styles across cultures. In MatsumotoD.Van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 130-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21.
KankarasM.MoorsG. (2009). Measurement equivalence in solidarity attitudes in Europe insights from a multiple-group latent-class factor approach. International Sociology, 24, 557-579. doi:10.1177/026858090933450210.1177/0268580909334502
22.
MagidsonJ.VermuntJ. K. (2001). Latent class factor and cluster models, bi-plots and related graphical displays. Sociological Methodology, 31, 223-264. doi:10.1111/0081-1750.0009610.1111/0081-1750.00096
23.
MarinG.GambaR. J.MarinB. V. (1992). Extreme response style and acquiescence among hispanics: The role of acculturation and education. Journal of Cross-Cultural psychology, 23, 498-509. doi:10.1177/002202219223400610.1177/0022022192234006
24.
MarinG.TriandisH. C.BetancourtH.KashimaY. (1983). Ethnic affirmation versus social desirability. Explaining discrepancies in bilinguals’ responses to a questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 173-186. doi:10.1177/002200218301400200310.1177/0022002183014002003
MoorsG. B. D. (2003). Diagnosing response style behavior by means of a latent-class factor approach. Socio-demographic correlates of gender role attitudes and perceptions of ethnic discrimination reexamined. Quality & Quantity, 37(3), 277-302. doi:10.1023/A:102447211000210.1023/A:1024472110002
27.
MoorsG. B. D.WennekersC. H. W. (2003). Comparing moral values in Western European countries between 1981 and 1999. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 44(2), 155-172. doi:10.1177/00207152030440020310.1177/002071520304400203
28.
MorrenM.GelissenJ. P. T. M.VermuntJ. K. (2011). Dealing with extreme response style in cross-cultural research: A restricted latent class factor approach. Sociological Methodology, 41. 13-47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01238.x10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01238.x
29.
MorrenM.GelissenJ. P. T. M.VermuntJ. K. (in press). The impact of controlling for extreme responding on measurement equivalence in cross-cultural research. Methodology.
30.
MunzR.StraubhaarT.VadeanF.VadeanN. (2006). The costs and benefits of European immigration (Policy Report 3). Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
31.
OysermanD.SakamotoI.LaufferA. (1998). Cultural accommodation: Hybridity and the framing of social obligation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1606-1618. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.160610.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1606
32.
PadillaA. M.PerezW. (2003). Acculturation, social identity and social cognition: A new perspective. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,25(1), 35-55. doi:10.1177/073998630325169410.1177/0739986303251694
33.
PanC.PfeilB. S. (2003). National minorities in Europe. Handbook. Wien, Austria: Braumuller.
34.
PerreiraK.Deeb-SossaM.HarrisN.MullanK.&BollenK. A. (2005). What are we measuring? An evaluation of the CES-D across race/ethnicity and immigrant generation.Social Forces, 83, 1567-1601. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.007710.1353/sof.2005.0077
35.
PhaletK.SchönpflugU. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 186-201. doi:10.1177/002202210103200200610.1177/0022022101032002006
36.
RalstonD. A.CunniffM. K.GustafsonD. J. (1995). Cultural accomodation. The effect of language on responses of bilingual Hong Kong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 714-727. doi:10.1177/00220221950260061210.1177/002202219502600612
37.
SchwarzN.SudmanS. (1996). Answering questions. Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
SmithE. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391-445). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
StevensG. W. J. M.PelsT. V. M.VolleberghW. A. M.CrijnenA. A. M. (2004). Patterns of psychological acculturation in adult and adolescent Moroccan immigrants living in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 689-704. doi:10.1177/002202210427011110.1177/0022022104270111
41.
SudmanS.&BradburnN. M. (1974).Response effects in surveys. A review and synthesis. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
42.
TourangeauR. (1987). Attitude measurement: A cognitive perspective. In HipplerH.J.SchwarzN.SudmanS. (Eds.), Social information processing and survey methodology (pp. 149-162). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
43.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TourangeauR.SmithT. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions. The impact of data collection mode, question format and question content. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275-304. doi:10.1086/29775110.1086/297751
45.
VandeVijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997).Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Van de VijverF. J. R.PhaletK. (2004). Assessment in multicultural groups: The role of acculturation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 215-236. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00169.x10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00169.x
47.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. doi:10.1177/10944281003100210.1177/109442810031002
48.
Van HemertD. A.BaerveldtC.VermandeM. (2001). Assessing cross-cultural item bias in questionnaires. Acculturation and the measurement of social support and family cohesion for adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 381-396. doi:10.1177/002202210103200400110.1177/0022022101032004001
49.
Van HerkH.PoortingaY. H.VerhallenT. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales. Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,35, 346-360. doi:10.1177/002202210426412610.1177/0022022104264126
50.
VermuntJ.MagidsonJ. (2005). Factor analysis with categorical indicators: A comparison between traditional and latent class approaches. In Van der ArkA.CroonM. A.SijtsmaK. (Eds.), New developments in categorical data analysis for the social and behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
YangY.HarknessJ. A.ChinT.Y.VillarA. (2010) Response styles and culture. In HarknessJ. A.. (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (pp. 203-223). New York, Hoboken: John Wiley.
