If cross-cultural researchers hope to contribute to cultural evolutionary theory, methods must be developed to describe and explain cultural processes. The distinction made by Boas between historical and comparative methods limited scholarly interest in the analysis of patterned historical change. Numerous techniques have been developed to draw diachronic inferences from synchronic ethnographic data, with varying degrees of success. The use of archaeological and historical data to draw diachronic inferences similarly has had mixed results but requires fewer assumptions and allows a more direct comparison of cultural change. Shifting the unit of analysis from the culture to the event allows events to be compared with one another. A case study from the evolution of numerical notation systems shows the potential of rigorous diachronic methodologies to complement synchronic ones. Although synchronic analysis is highly useful for studying correlations between traits, diachronic analysis is far better for analyzing processes of change.
Aberle, D. F. (1974). Historical reconstruction and its explanatory role in comparative ethnology. In J. Jorgensen (Ed.), Comparative studies by Harold E. Driver and essays in his honor (pp. 63-80). New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
2.
Aberle, D. F. (1984). The language family as a field for historical reconstruction. Journal of Anthropological Research, 40, 129-136.
3.
Aberle, D. F. (1987). Distinguished lecture: What kind of science is anthropology?American Anthropologist, 89(3), 551-566.
4.
Algaze, G. (1993). Expansionary dynamics of some early pristine states. American Anthropologist, 95(2), 304-333.
5.
Blanton, R. E., Kowalewski, S. A., Feinman, G. M., & Finsten, L. M. (1993). Ancient Mesoamerica: A comparison of change in three regions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Boas, F. (1894). Indianische Sagen von der nord-pacifischen Küste Amerikas [Indian myths and legends from the North Pacific coast of America]. Berlin: Asher.
7.
Boas, F. (1896). The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. Science, 4, 901-908.
8.
Bradley, C., Moore, C. C., Burton, M. L., & White, D. R. (1990). A cross-cultural historical analysis of subsistence change. American Anthropologist, 92, 447-457.
9.
Carneiro, R. L. (1962). Scale analysis as an instrument for the study of cultural evolution. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 18, 149-169.
10.
Carneiro, R. L. (1968). Ascertaining, testing and interpreting sequences of cultural development. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24, 354-374.
11.
Carneiro, R. L. (1969). The measurement of cultural development in the ancient Near East and in Anglo-Saxon England. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II, 31, 1013-1023.
12.
Carneiro, R. L. (2000). The muse of history and the science of culture. New York: Kluwer.
13.
Carneiro, R. L. (2003). Evolutionism in cultural anthropology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
14.
Chase-Dunn, C., & Hall, T. D. (1994). The historical evolution of world-systems. Sociological Inquiry, 64(3), 257-280.
15.
Chase-Dunn, C., & Manning, E. S. (2002). City systems and world systems: Four millennia of city growth and decline. Cross-Cultural Research, 36(4), 379-398.
16.
Childe, V. G. (1951). Social evolution. London: Watts & Co.
17.
Chrisomalis, S. (2003). The comparative history of numerical notation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
18.
Chrisomalis, S. (2004). A cognitive typology for numerical notation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(1), 37-52.
19.
Costopoulos, A. (1998). The polygenetic hypothesis: A simulation approach. Kontaktstencil, 41, 7-17.
20.
Coulborn, R. (1959). The origin of civilized societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
Coulborn, R. (1966). Structure and process in the rise and fall of civilized societies. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 8, 404-431.
22.
Curtin, P. D. (1984). Cross-cultural trade in world history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Dixon, R. M. W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Driver, H. E. (1966). Geographical-historical versus psycho-functional explanations of kin avoidance. Current Anthropology, 7(2), 131-182.
25.
Earle, T. K. (1997). How chiefs come to power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
26.
Eggan, F. (1954). Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist, 56, 743-763.
27.
Ember, M., & Ember, C. R. (1995). Worldwide cross-cultural studies and their relevance for archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 3, 87-111.
28.
Erickson, E. E. (1973). The life cycle of life styles: Projecting the course of local evolutionary sequences. Behavior Science Research, 8, 135-167.
29.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1951). Social anthropology. London: Cohen and West.
30.
Flannery, K. V., & Marcus, J. (Eds.). (1983). The cloud people: Divergent evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec civilizations. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Freeman, L. C., & Winch, R. F. (1957). Societal complexity: An empirical test of a typology of societies. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 461-466.
32.
Fried, M. H. (1967). The evolution of political society. New York: Random House.
33.
Fuller, J. E., & Grandjean, B. D. (2001). Economy and religion in the Neolithic Revolution: Material surplus and the proto-religious ethic. Cross-Cultural Research, 35(4), 370-399.
34.
Gray, C. E. (1972). Paradoxes in Western creativity. American Anthropologist, 74, 676-688.
35.
Greenberg, J. H. (1969). Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In J. Puhvel (Ed.), Substance and structure of language (pp. 147-203). Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Greenberg, J. H. (1978). Diachrony, synchrony, and language universals. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 1: Method and theory (pp. 61-92). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
37.
Holmes, R. B., & Smith, B. S. (1977). Beginning Cherokee (2nd ed.). Norman: University of Oklahoma.
38.
HRAF. (2005). eHRAF archaeology survey results—Feb. 2005. Retrieved September 30, 2005, from http://www.yale.edu/hraf/eHRAF_archaeology_survey_results_Feb05.htm
39.
Jorgensen, J. G. (Ed.). (1974). Comparative studies by Harold E. Driver and essays in his honor. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
40.
Jorgensen, J. G. (1979a). Cross-cultural comparisons. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8, 309-331.
41.
Jorgensen, J. G. (1979b). Western Indians: Comparative environments, languages, and cultures of 172 western American Indian societies. San Francisco: Freeman.
42.
Köbben, A. J. (1952). New ways of presenting an old idea: The statistical method in social anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 82, 129-146.
43.
Korotayev, A., Kazankov, A., Dreier, L., & Dmitrieva, N. (2003). Evolutionary implications of cross-cultural correlations. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(3), 247-264.
44.
Kroeber, A. L. (1931). Historical reconstruction of culture growths and organic evolution. American Anthropologist, 33, 149-156.
45.
Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
Kroeber, A. L. (1957). Style and civilizations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
47.
Mace, R., & Pagel, M. (1994). The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 35(5), 549-564.
48.
Maisels, C. K. (1987). Models of social evolution: Trajectories from the Neolithic to the state. Man, 22, 331-359.
49.
Melko, M. (1973). 52 peaceful societies. Oakville: Canadian Peace Research Institute.
50.
Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient society. Chicago: Kerr and Company.
51.
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Macmillan.
52.
Murdock, G. P. (1959). Africa: Its peoples and their culture history. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
Murdock, G. P. (1965). Culture and society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
54.
Murdock, G. P., & Provost, C. (1973). Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology, 12, 203-225.
55.
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329-369.
56.
Nadel, S. F. (1951). The foundations of social anthropology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
57.
Naroll, R. (1968). Some thoughts on comparative method in cultural anthropology. In H. M. Blalock & A. B. Blalock (Eds.), Methodology in social research (pp. 236-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Naroll, R., Benjamin, E. D., Fohl, F. K., Fried, M. J., Hildreth, R. D., & Schaefer, J. M. (1971). Creativity: A cross-historical pilot study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 181-188.
59.
Naroll, R., Bullough, V. L., & Naroll, F. (1974). Military deterrence in history. Albany: SUNY Press.
60.
Naroll, R., O’Leary, T. J., & Sigelman, L. (1974). A hologeistic bibliography (Working Paper No. 23, ISA/CISS). Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies.
61.
Peel, J. D. Y. (1987). History, culture and the comparative method: A West African puzzle. In L. Holy (Ed.), Comparative anthropology (pp. 88-118). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
62.
Peregrine, P. N. (2001). Cross-cultural comparative approaches in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 1-18.
63.
Peregrine, P. N. (2003). Atlas of cultural evolution. World Cultures, 14(1), 2-88.
64.
Peregrine, P. N. (2004). Cross-cultural approaches in archaeology: Comparative ethnology, comparative archaeology, and archaeoethnology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 12(3), 281-309.
65.
Peregrine, P. N., Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2004). Universal patterns in cultural evolution: An empirical analysis using Guttman scaling. American Anthropologist, 106(1), 145-149.
66.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1951). The comparative method in social anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 81, 15-22.
67.
Rouse, I. (1986). Migrations in prehistory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
Sahlins, M. D. (1963). Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 285-303.
69.
Sahlins, M. D., & Service, E. R. (Eds.). (1960). Evolution and culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
70.
Sanderson, S. K. (1990). Social evolutionism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
71.
Sanderson, S. K. (1995). Social transformations. Oxford: Blackwell.
72.
Schapera, I. (1953). Some comments on comparative method in social anthropology. American Anthropologist, 55, 353-366.
73.
Service, E. R. (1962). Primitive social organization: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Random House.
74.
Sorokin, P. A. (1937-1941). Social and cultural dynamics (4 vols.). New York: American Book Co.
75.
Spencer, C. S. (1990). On the tempo and mode of state formation: Neoevolutionism reconsidered. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9, 1-30.
76.
Spencer, H. (1876-1896). Descriptive sociology (3 vols.). London: Williams and Norgate.
77.
Spengler, O. (1926). The decline of the West (2 vols., C. F. Atkinson, Trans.). New York: Knopf.
78.
Steward, J. (1949). Cultural causality and law: A trial formulation of the development of early civilizations. American Anthropologist, 51, 1-27.
79.
Tainter, J. A. (1988). The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
Toynbee, A. (1934-1961). A study of history (12 vols.). New York: Oxford University Press.
81.
Tugby, D. J. (1964). On the use of scale analysis in the study of culture. Man, 64, 144-146.
82.
Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture. London: John Murray.
83.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system. New York: Academic Press.
84.
White, D. R. (1975). Process, statistics, and anthropological theory: An appreciation of Harold Driver. Reviews in Anthropology, 2, 295-314.
85.
White, D. R., Burton, M. L., & Brudner, L. A. (1977). Entailment theory and method: A cross-cultural analysis of the sexual division of labor. Behavior Science Research, 12, 1-24.
86.
White, L. A. (1959). The evolution of culture: The development of civilization to the fall of Rome. New York: McGraw-Hill.
87.
Whiting, J. W. M. (1968). Methods and problems in cross-cultural research. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 693-728). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
88.
Wilkinson, D. (1992). Cities, civilizations, and oikumenes: I. Comparative Civilizations Review, 27, 51-87.
89.
Willey, G. R. (1991). Horizonal integration and regional diversity: An alternating process in the rise of civilizations. American Antiquity, 56, 197-215.
90.
Wobst, H. M. (1978). The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology. American Antiquity, 43(2), 303-309.
91.
Wolf, E. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
