Does culture have clearly identifiable, distributionally stable parts sufficient to justify the particulate mode of understanding? Is culture composed of elemental units, or is it merely convenient to think this way? And, if culture does not consist of discrete parts, then what? This article suggests that the quest for natural “units of culture” is pretty much a doomed undertaking. There will be no periodic chart for culture grounded in stable, essential properties whether at the level of culture traits and complexes or at the cognitive level of ideas and schemas. On the other hand, various methods of data elicitation can produce replicable and superficially discrete results, which gives some hope for the possibility of a methodological particulatism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnes, J. A. (1971). Three styles in the study of kinship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Benedict, R. (1923). The concept of the guardian spirit in North America. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association (No. 29). Lancaster, PA: New Era Printing Co.
3.
Boas, F. (1938). Introduction. In F. Boas (Ed.), General anthropology (pp. 1-6). New York: D. C. Heath.
4.
Boas, F. (1965). The mind of primitiveman(Rev. ed.). NewYork: Free Press. (Original work published 1911)
5.
Boas, F. (1966a). The aims of anthropological research. In Race, language, and culture (pp. 243-259). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
6.
Boas, F. (1966b). The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. In Race, language, and culture (pp. 270-280). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1896)
7.
Boas, F. (1966c). The methods of ethnology. In Race, language, and culture (pp. 281-289). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1920)
8.
Boas, F. (1966d). Review of Graebner, Methode der Ethnologie. In Race, language, and culture (pp. 295-304). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1911)
9.
Boster, J. S. (1985). “Requiem for the omniscient informant”: There’s life in the old girl yet. In J. Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in cognitive anthropology (pp. 177-197). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10.
Boster, J. S. (1987). Introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 150-162.
11.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other measures of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
12.
D’Andrade, R. (1981). The cultural part of cognition. Cognitive Science, 5, 179-195.
13.
D’Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labor in society (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1897)
15.
Ehrenreich, P. (1903). Zur Frage der Beurteilung und Bewertung ethnographischer Analogien [To the question of judging and evaluating ethnographic analogies]. Korrespondenz-Blatt der deutschen Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, 34, 176-180.
16.
Gatewood, J. B. (1978). Fishing, memory, and the stability of culture complexes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
17.
Gatewood, J. B. (1983). Loose talk: Linguistic competence and recognition ability. American Anthropologist, 85, 378-387.
18.
Gatewood, J. B. (1986). Case studies and culture complexes: Double burial revisited. Journal of Anthropology, 5, 98-141.
19.
Gatewood, J. B. (1994, December). Personal knowledge and collective representations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Atlanta, GA.
20.
Gatewood, J. B. (1996, November). Ignorance, knowledge, anddummycategories: Social and cognitive aspects of expertise. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.
21.
Goldenweiser, A. (1913). The principle of limited possibilities in the development of culture. Journal of American Folklore, 26, 259-290.
22.
Goldenweiser, A. (1937). Anthropology: An introduction to primitive culture. New York: F. S. Crofts.
23.
Graebner, F. (1911). Die Methode der Ethnologie [The methods of ethnology]. Heidelberg, Germany: Winter.
24.
Hallowell, A. I. (1926). Bear ceremonialism in the Northern hemisphere. American Anthropologist, 28, 1-175.
25.
Herskovits, M. J. (1926). The cattle complex in East Africa. American Anthropologist, 28, 230-272, 361-380, 494-528, 633-664.
26.
Kaiser, R. E. (1980). The Medieval English longbow. Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries [Online], 23. Available: http://snt.student.utwente.nl/sagi/artikel/longbow/longbow.html
27.
Kluckhohn, C. (1936). Some reflections on the method and theory of the Kulturkreislehre. American Anthropologist, 38, 157-196.
28.
Kluckhohn, C. (1953). Universal categories of culture. In A. L. Kroeber (Ed.), Anthropology today (pp. 507-523). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Kroeber, A. L. (1948). Anthropology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
30.
Kronenfeld, D. (1996). Plastic glasses and church fathers: Semantic extension from the ethnoscience tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Linton, R. (1936). The study of man. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32.
Lowie, R. H. (1912). On the principle of convergence in ethnology. Journal of American Folklore, 25, 24-42.
33.
Lowie, R. H. (1936). Cultural anthropology: Ascience. American Journal of Sociology, 42, 301-320.
34.
Lowie, R. H. (1937). The history of ethnological theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35.
Needham, R. (1975). Polythetic classification: Convergence and consequences. Man, 10, 349-369.
36.
Radin, P. (1933). The method and theory of ethnology: An essay in criticism. New York: Basic Books.
37.
Roberts, J. M. (1964). The self-management of cultures. In W. Goodenough (Ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock (pp. 433-454). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C.,& Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313-338.
39.
Schwartz, T. (1978). Where is the culture? Personality as the distributive locus of culture. In G. Spindler (Ed.), The making of psychological anthropology (pp. 419-441). Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
Spiro, M. E. (1951). Culture and personality: The natural history of a false dichotomy. Psychiatry, 14, 19-46.
41.
Wallace, A.F.C. (1961). Introduction. In Culture and personality (pp. 1-44). New York: Random House.
42.
Wilkins, J. S. (1998). What’s in a meme? Reflections from the perspective of the history and philosophy of evolutionary biology. Journal of Memetics—Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission [Online], 2. Available: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/vol2/wilkins_js.html
43.
Wissler, C. (1916). Aboriginal maize culture as a typical culture-complex. American Journal of Sociology, 21, 656-661.
44.
Wissler, C. (1923). Man and culture. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
