Measures of the importance of and self-satisfaction with the independent and interdependent self were used to test age, gender, and culture differences in the nature of self-conception. The participants were 903 first or second-year college undergraduates and 936 middle-class adults from four countries differing markedly in religious, political, and cultural dimensions: Hong Kong, Iran, Russia, and the United States. In both college and adult samples from all four countries, the Interdependent self was rated more important and a greater source of satisfaction than the Independent self. Analyses of variance indicated substantial main effects for age Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 34 No. 2, May 2000 113-134 and country but a very modest gender effect. However, the interaction effects were also substantial. The data were interpreted as casting doubt on explanations of the nature of self-conception in terms of a single cultural dimension, such as Individualism-Collectivism or gender. The danger of generalizing about a country from a single group, such as college students, was also evident, as within-country differences were consistently found for the adult and student samples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, S. M., Reznik, I., & Chen, S. (1997). The self in relation to others: Cognitive and motivational underpinnings. In J. G. Snodgrass& R. L. Thompson (Eds.), The self across psychology (pp. 233-275). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
2.
Bochner, S. (1994). Cross-cultural differences in the self-concept: A test of Hofstede’s individualism/collectivism distinction. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 273-283.
3.
Bond, M. H. (1994). Into the heart of collectivism: Apersonal and scientific journey. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi,& G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bond, M. H. (1996). Social psychology across cultures: Two ways forward. Keynote address at the 26th International Congress of Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
5.
Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T.-S. (1983). College students’ spontaneous selfconcept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
6.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in crosscultural research (pp.137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Byrne, B., Shavelson, R. J., & Marsh, H. W. (1992). Multigroup comparisons in self-concept research. In T. M. Brinthaupt & R. P. Lipka (Eds.), The self: Definitional and methodological issues. New York: State University of New York Press.
8.
Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124-131.
9.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 722, 5-37.
10.
Davis-Zinner, N. (1990). Source differences in male and female self-esteem. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.
11.
Dhawan, N., Roseman, I. J., Naidu, R. K., Thapa, K.,& Rettek, S. I. (1995). Self-concepts across two cultures; India and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 606-621.
12.
Elovson, A. C., & Fleming, J. S. (1988). Rationale for multidimensional self-esteem scale scoring and weighting. Unpublished manuscript, California State University.
13.
Enriquez, V. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
15.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Hayes, N. (1993). Principles of social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec,& R. C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
19.
Hsu, F.L.K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. de Vos,& F.L.K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self. London: Tavistock.
20.
Inelmen, K. (1996). Relationship of sex-role orientation to two measures of self-esteem. Unpublished MA thesis, Bogazici University.
21.
Ip, G.W.M., & Bond, M. H. (1995). Culture, values, and the spontaneous self-concept. Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 29-35.
22.
Josephs, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Tafarodi, R. W. (1992). Gender and selfesteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 391-402.
23.
Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S. C., Gelfand, M. J., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
24.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H.,& Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Selfenhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267.
25.
Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68-76.
26.
Luk, C. L.,& Bond, M. H. (1992). Explaining Chinese self-esteem in terms of the self-concept. Psychologia, 35, 147-154.
27.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
28.
Mpofu, E. (1994). Exploring the self-concept in an African culture. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 341-354.
29.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Schwartz, S. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi,& G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Schweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1982). Does the concept of self vary cross-culturally? In A. J. Marsella & G. M. White (Eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy. Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
32.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J.,& Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
33.
Tam, A.S.F., & Watkins, D. (1995). Towards a hierarchical model of selfconcept for Hong Kong Chinese adults with physical disabilities. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 1-17.
34.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
35.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
36.
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C.,& Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
37.
Walsh, W. A.,& Banaji, M. R. (1997). The collective self. In J. Snodgrass& R. L. Thompson (Eds.), The self across psychology (pp. 193-214). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 818,
38.
Watkins, D., Adair, J., Akande, A., Cheng, C., Fleming, J., Gerong, A., Ismail, M., McInerney, D., Lefner, K., Mpofu, E., Regmi, M., Singh-Sengupta, S., Watson, S., Wondimu, H., & Yu, J. (1998). Cultural dimensions, gender, and the nature of self-concept: A fourteen-country study. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 17-31.
39.
Watkins, D., Adair, J., Akande, A., Gerong, A., McInerney, D., Sunar, D., Watson, S., Wen, Q., & Wondimu, H. (1998). Individualismcollectivism, gender, and the self-concept: Anine-culture investigation. Psychologia, 41, 259-271.
40.
Watkins, D., Yau, J., Dahlin, B., & Wondimu, H. (1997). The Twenty Statements Test: Some measurement issues. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 626-633.
41.
Watkins, D., Yau, J., Fleming, J., Davis-Zinner, N., Tam, A., Juhasz, A.,& Walker, A. (1997). Gender differences in the basis and level of adult self-esteem: A cross-cultural perspective. Psychologia, 40, 265-276.
42.
Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi,& G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
