Previous research investigating the influence of cultural variables on the psychological constructs of self-concept and causal attributions has employed responses of individuals within cultures. In the present research, ethnographies of 16 cultures were examined using the CD-ROM version of the Human Relations Area Files (HRAF). As predicted, self-concept was related to both cultural tightness and collectivism. Specifically, interdependent self-concepts were more likely to occur in tight and collective cultures, whereas independent self-concepts occurred in individualistic and loose cultures. Causal attributions for failure were found to be more external for more collective cultures, but no relation between failure attributions and cultural tightness was obtained. Causal attributions for success were not systematically related to either cultural tightness or collectivism. Additional variables that are speculated to influence attributions, in conjunction with culture, are proposed for future research. The usefulness of the CD-ROM version of the HRAF for addressing psychological questions is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-Zahrani, S. S., & Kaplowitz, S. A. (1993). Attributional biases in individualistic and collectivistic cultures: A comparison of Americans with Saudis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 223-233.
2.
Anderson, C. A. (1999). Attributional style, depression, and loneliness: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Chinese students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 482-499.
3.
Anderson, M. (1978). Saami ethnoecology: Resource management in Norwegian Lapland. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
4.
Arkin, R., Cooper, H., & Kolditz, T. (1980). A statistical review of the literature concerning the self-serving attribution bias in interpersonal influence situations. Journal of Personality, 48, 435-448.
5.
Bond, M. H., & Cheung, T. (1983). College students’ spontaneous selfconcept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
6.
Brewer, M. B.,& Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
7.
Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124-131.
8.
Dhawan, N., Roseman, I. J., Naidu, R. K., Thapa, K.,& Rettek, S. I. (1995). Self-concepts across two cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 606-621.
9.
Gluckman, M. (1967). The judicial process among the Baroste of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
10.
Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
11.
Greenwald, A. G.,& Pratkanis, A. R. (1984). The self. In R. S. Wyer& T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition(Vol. 3, pp. 129-178). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Hewstone, M., Bond, M.,& Wan, K.-C. (1983). Social facts and social attributions: The explanations of intergroup differences in Hong Kong. Social Cognition, 2, 142-157.
13.
Hickman, J. M. (1964). The Aymara of Chinchera, Peru: Persistence and change in a bicultural context. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
14.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Hui, C. H.,& Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296-309.
16.
Ip, G.W.M., & Bond, M. H. (1995). Culture, values, and the spontaneous self-concept. Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 30-36.
17.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Lalljee, M., & Angelova, R. (1995). Person description in India, Britain, and Bulgaria. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 645-657.
19.
Lee, F., Hallahan, M., & Herzog, T. (1996). Explaining real-life events: How culture and domain shape attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 732-741.
20.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
21.
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
22.
Miller, J. G. (1987). Cultural influences on the development of conceptual differentiation in person description. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 309-319.
23.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
24.
Newman, L. S. (1991). Why are traits inferred spontaneously? A developmental approach. Social Cognition, 9, 221-253.
25.
Oyserman, D. (1993). The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993-1009.
26.
Pelto, P. J. (1968, April). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 37-40.
27.
Penniman, T. K. (1929). The Arunta religion. The Sociological Review, 21, 10-37.
28.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737-756.
29.
Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 142-152.
30.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Shweder, R., & Levine, R. A. (1984). Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Spencer, B., & Gillen, F. J. (1928). The Arunta: A study of a stone age people. London: Macmillan and Co.
33.
Taylor, D. M.,& Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a south Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171.
34.
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. D., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
35.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
36.
Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
37.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
38.
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C.,& Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
