The argument that gender-specific career development theories neglect important categories of life concerns for both women and men is considered, and the implications for assessment and counseling are discussed. Recommendations for expanding theory, assessment, and counseling are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astin, H.S. (1984). The meaning of work in women's lives: A sociopsychological model of career choice and work behavior. The Counseling Psychologist , 12, 117-126.
2.
Betz, N.E., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1987). The career psychology of women. Orlando, FL: Academic Press .
3.
Betz, N.E., & Hackett, G. (1997). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the career assessment of women. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 383-402.
4.
Bingham, R.P., & Ward, C.M. (1997). Theory into assessment: A model for women of color . Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 403-418.
5.
Diamond, E.E. (1978). Issues of sex bias and sex fairness in career interest measurement. In C. K. Tittle & D. G. Zytowski (Eds.), Sex-fair interest measurement: Research and implications (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
6.
Farmer, H.S. (1976). What inhibits career achievement and career motivation in women? The Counseling Psychologist, 6, 12-14.
7.
Farmer, H.S. (1997). Women's motivation related to mastery, career salience, and career aspiration: A multivariate model focusing on the effects of sex role socialization. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 355-381.
8.
Farmer, H.S. (1985). Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 363-390.
9.
Fassinger, R.E. (1985). A causal model of career choice in college women . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 123-153.
10.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Fassinger, R.E., & Betz, N.E. (1995). Theoretical advances in the study of women's career development. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 67-109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Fitzgerald, L.F., & Weitzman, L.M. (1992). Women's career development: Theory and practice from a feminist perspective. In Z. Lieberweitz & D. Lea (Eds.), Adult career development (2nd ed., pp. 124-160). Alexandria, VA: National Career Development Association .
12.
Gilbert, L.A. (1985). Men in dual-career families: Current realities and future prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Gilbert, L.A. (1994). Reclaiming and returning gender to context: Examples from studies of heterosexual dual-earner families. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 539-558.
14.
Gottfredson, L.S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 69-84.
15.
Gottfredson, L.S., & Lapan, R.T. (1997). Assessing gender-based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 419-441.
16.
Hackett, G., & Betz, N.E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.
17.
Harmon, L. W., Birk, J., Fitzgerald, L. E., & Tanney, M. F. (Eds.) (1977). Counseling women . Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
18.
Lefcourt, L.A. (1995). The Self-Efficacy Expectations for Role Management Measure (SEERM) and its relationship with self-construct concepts and efficacy sources for career women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
19.
Schlossberg, N.K., & Goodman, J. (1972). Imperative for change: Counselor's use of the Strong Vocational Interest Blank. Impact, 2, 25-29.
20.
Swanson, J.L., Woitke, M.B. (1997). Theory into practice in career assessment for women: Assessment and interventions regarding perceived career barriers. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 443-462.
21.
Weitzman, L.M. (1992). The development and validation of scales to assess realism of attitudes toward multiple role planning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign .
