This article reports correlations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; Myers & McCaulley, 1985) scales and scales from two aptitude measures: (a) the Differential Aptitude Tests-Adaptive (DAT-A; McBride, 1986; Moe, 1988), using a sample of 122 university and community career assessment clients, and (b) the Ball Aptitude Battery (BAB; Ball Foundation, 1993), using a sample of 99 high school students. The results are similar to those reported by Stricker and Ross (1962). Factors such as sex, age group (adolescent and adult), and the degree to which an aptitude test reflected general cognitive ability appeared to moderate the degree to which the results were in accord with Jungian theory. Implications for career assessment and Jungian personality theory are discussed.
Bennett, G.K., Seashore, H.G., & Wesman, A.G. (1982). Differential Aptitude Tests (Forms V and W): Administrator's handbook. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Bizot, E.B. (1993). BAB-GATB reanalysis . Unpublished manuscript.
3.
Briggs, K.C., & Myers, I.B. (1993). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Form G Self-ScorablePalo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
4.
Carson, A.D. (1992). Moderators of the prediction of job satisfaction from congruence and other constructs: A test of Holland's theory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, A.
5.
Cohen, L.M., & Ambrose, D.C. (1993). Theories and practices for differential education for the gifted and talented. In K. A. Heller , F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development ofgiftedness and talent (pp. 339-364). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
6.
Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.; for Committee on techniques for the enhancement of human performance, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council). (1991). In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance (pp. 80-104). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Goldman, S.H. (1987, February). BAB tests and their relations to GATB, and prediction of success on 66 occupational aptitude patterns (OAPs). (Technical Report No. 25). Glen Ellyn, IL: Ball Foundation.
8.
Goldman, S.H., Bizot, E.B., & Rischall, R.Y. (1994, June). Three year test-retest shows stability of aptitudes in adolescence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
9.
Gottfredson, G.D., & Holland, J.L. (1990). A longitudinal test of the influence of congruence: Job satisfaction, competency utilization, and counterproductive behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 389-398.
10.
Hakstian, A.R., & Cattell, R.B. (1982). Manual for the Comprehensive Ability Battery. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
11.
Healy, C.C. (1989). Negative: The MBTI: Not ready for routine use in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 487-489.
12.
Henly, S.J., Klebe, K.J., McBride, J.R., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.
13.
Holland, J.L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
14.
Hollwitz, J. (1992). Individuation at work: Considerations for prediction and evaluation. In M. Stein & J. Hollwitz (Eds.), Psyche at work (pp. 19-37). Wilmette, IL: Chiron.
15.
Jung, C.G. (1968). The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 12. Psychology and alchemy (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1952)
16.
Jung, C.G. (1971). The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 6. Psychological types (H. G. Baynes, Trans. & R. F. C. Hull, Rev. Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921 )
17.
Lowman, R.L. (1991). The clinical practice of career assessment: Interests, abilities, and personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Mattoon, M.A. (1981). Jungian psychology in perspective. New York: Free Press.
19.
McBride, J.R. (1986, August). A computerized adaptive edition of the Differential Aptitude Tests. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
20.
McCaulley, M.H., & Martin, C.R. (1995). Career assessment and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator . Journal of Career Assessment, 3, 219-239.
21.
Moe, K.C. (1988). User manual for the Differential Aptitude Tests: Computerized adaptive edition, IBM PC(r) version. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
22.
Moore, T. (1987, March 30). Personality tests are back. Fortune, 74-82.
Myers, I.B., & McCaulley, M.H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
25.
Pittenger, D.J. (1993a). Measuring the MBTI...and coming up short. Journal of Career Planning and Employment, 54(3), 48-52.
26.
Pittenger, D.J. (1993b). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator . Review of Educational Research, 63, 467-488.
27.
Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49-57.
28.
Rischall, R.Y., & Bizot, E.B. (1994, July). Construct validity and scoring of the BAB Auditory and Associative Memory tests. (Technical Report No. 30). Glen Ellyn, IL: Ball Foundation.
29.
Rischall, R.Y., Bizot, E.B., & Lobsenz, R. (1995, May). Differential abilities, personality, and interests across job content categories. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
30.
Spokane, A.R. (1991). Career intervention. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Stricker, L.J., & Ross, J. (1962). A description and evaluation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Research Bulletin RB-62-6. Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service.
32.
Strong, E.K., Jr. (1943). Vocational interests of men and women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Suplee, C. (1991, September 25). Performance-enhancement techniques found flawed or ineffective in study. The Washington Post , p. A3.
34.
Tannenbaum, A.J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions ofgiftedness (pp. 21-52). Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Thorne, A., & Gough, H. (1991). Portraits of type: An MBTI research compendium . Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
36.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1970). Manual for the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
