These studies explore the usefulness of thinking about one's occupational future in gender-linked jobs from the perspective of "possible selves." We developed lists of feminine, masculine, and neutral occupations and asked 31 women and 66 men how possible they thought these jobs were for them, and how much they feared them (i.e., believed they would be unhappy doing them). Women feared masculine jobs more than they rated such jobs as possible. Both women and men feared feminine jobs more than they viewed these jobs as possible. The occupational list was revised and a second sample of 34 women was asked how much they expected, feared, and hoped for these gender-typed jobs. The results were similar. Women feared both the masculine and feminine jobs more than they saw these jobs as possible, and there was some indication they hoped for the masculine jobs more than they expected them. The results are discussed in terms of how a possible selves approach could facilitate career assessment and counseling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2.
Beere, C.A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures . Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
3.
Betz, N.E. (in press). Theory and concepts in the study of women's career development . In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
4.
Betz, N.E., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1987). The career psychology of women. Orlando: Academic Press.
5.
Betz, N.E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410.
6.
Betz, N.E., Heesacker, R.S., & Shuttleworth, C.S. (1990). Moderators of the congruence and realism of major and occupational plans in college students: A replication and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 269-276.
7.
Crane, M., & Markus, H. (1982). Gender identity: The benefits of a self-schema approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1195-1197.
8.
Day, J.D., Borkowski, J.G., Dietmeyer, D.L., Howsepian, B.A., & Saenz, D.S. (1992). Possible selves and academic achievement. In L. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children's development within social contexts (pp. 181-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Day, J.D., Borkowski, J.G., Punzo, D.L., & Howsepian, B.A. (in press). Enhancing possible selves in Mexican-American students. Motivation and Emotion.
10.
Farmer, H.S. (1976). What inhibits career and achievement motivation in women?The Counseling Psychologist, 6, 12-14.
11.
Fitzgerald, L.F., & Betz, N.E. (1983). Issues in the vocational psychology of women. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Volume 1 Foundations (pp. 83-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Fitzgerald, L.F., & Crites, J.O. (1980). Toward a career psychology of women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 44-62.
13.
Fitzgerald, L.F., & Rounds, J. (1994). Women and work: Theory encounters reality. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women (pp. 327-354). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Fitzgerald, L.F., & Weitzman, L.M. (1992). Women's career development: Theory and practice from a feminist perspective. In Z. Leibowitz & D. Lea (Eds.), Adult career development: Concepts issues and practices (2nd ed.) (pp.124-160). Arlington, VA: American Association of Counseling and Development.
15.
Hackett, G., & Lonborg, S. (1994). Career assessment and counseling for women. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women (pp. 43-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Harmon, L.W. (1977). Career counseling for women. In E. Rawlings & D. Carter (Eds.), Psychotherapy for women (pp. 197-206). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
17.
Holland, J.L. (1985). Professional manual for the Self-Directed Search . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18.
Kerr, B.A., & Maresh, S.E. (1994). Career counseling for gifted women. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women (pp. 197-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Kriger, S.F. (1972). Achievement and perceived parental childrearing attitudes of career women and homemakers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2, 419-432.
20.
Leung, A.S., & Harmon, L.W. (1990). Individual and sex differences in the zone of acceptable alternatives. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 37, 153-159.
21.
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38-50.
22.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist , 41, 954-969.
23.
Markus, H., & Ruvolo, A. (1989). Possible selves: Personalized representations of goals. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 211-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Nevill, D.D., & Schlecker, D.I. (1988). The relation of self-efficacy and assertiveness to willingness to engage in traditional/nontraditional career activities. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 91-98.
25.
Ogilvie, D.M. (1987). The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 379-385.
26.
Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
27.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Statistical abstract of the U.S (112th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
28.
White, M.J., Kruczek, T.A., Brown, M.T., & White, G.B. (1989). Occupational sex stereotypes among college students . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 289-298.
29.
Zytowski, D.G., & Borgen, F.H. (1983). Assessment. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Vol. 2. Applications (pp. 5-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
