A method to include the unique cultural and contextual backgrounds of Native Americans into the career assessment process is discussed in this article. The cultural and contextual differential assessment method focuses on five cultural differentials that are language usage, cultural orientation, home community, family system, and communication style. Cultural and Contextual Decision Paths are identified that provide practical guides for use by counselors and clients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
Blackwell, T.L., Conrad, A.D., & Weed, R.O. (1992). Job analysis and the ADA: A step by step guide . Athens, GA: Elliott & Fitzpatrick .
4.
Bowman, S.L. (1993). Career intervention strategies for ethnic minorities . The Career Development Quarterly, 42, 14-25.
5.
Carter, D.J., & Wilson, R. (1992). Minorities in higher education. 1991 tenth annual status report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
6.
Chief, E.H. (1940). An assimilation study of Indian girls. Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 19-30.
7.
Dana, R.H., Hornby, R., & Hoffman, T. (1984). Local norms for personality assessment of Rosebud Sioux. White Cloud Journal, 3, 19-25.
8.
Dana, R.H. (1986). Personality assessment and Native Americans. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(3), 480-500.
9.
Epperson, D.L., & Hammond, D.C. (1981). Use of interest inventories with Native Americans: A case for local norms. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 213-220.
10.
Farr, J. M. (Ed.). (1993). The complete guide for occupational exploration. Indianapolis, IN: JIST Works.
11.
Fouad, N.A. (1993). Cross cultural vocational assessment. The Career Development Quarterly, 42, 4-13.
12.
Frank, L.W. (1987, Fall). Cultural factors that can affect rehabilitation of American Indians. UTS"ITISHTAAN'I, p. 4. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, Native American Research and Training Center. (Available from the American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, P.O. Box 5630, Flagstaff, AZ 86011).
13.
Hanson, M.J., Lynch, E.W., & Wayman, K.I. (1990). Honoring the cultural diversity of families when gathering data. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 10, 112-131.
14.
Hodgkinson, G.L. (1990). The demographics ofAmerican Indians: One percent of the people; fifty percent of the diversity. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
Ivey, A. (1983). Intentional Interviewing and Counseling. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17.
Jastak, J., & Jastak, S. (1979). Wide Range Interest-Opinion Test manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
18.
Johnson, M.J., Joe, J., Locust, C., Miller, D., & Frank, L. (1987). Overview of the American Indian population and the influence of culture on individuals with disabilities. In J. C. O'Connell (Ed.), A study of the special problems and needs of American Indians with handicaps both on and off the reservation (Vol. 1, pp. 1-21). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, Native American Research and Training Center; Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Native American Research and Training Center.
19.
Johnson, M., Swartz, J., & Martin, W.E., Jr., (in press). Application of psychological theory for career development with Native Americans. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), Career Development and Vocational Behavior of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Kuder, G.F. (1975). General Interest Survey (Form E)-ManualChicago: Science Research Associates.
21.
LaFromboise, T.D., Trimble, J.E., & Mohatt, G.V. (1990). Counseling intervention and American Indian tradition: An integrative approach. The Counseling Psychologist, 18, 628-654.
22.
Lowrey, L. (1983). Bridging a culture in counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 14, 69-73.
23.
Marshall, C.A., Johnson, M.J., Martin, W.E., Jr., Saravanabhavan, R.C., & Bradford , B. (1992). The rehabilitation needs of American Indians with disabilities in an urban setting. Journal of Rehabilitation, 58, 13-21.
24.
Martin, W.E., Jr. (in press). Career development assessment and intervention strategies with American Indians. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), Career Development and Vocational Behavior of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Martin, W.E., Jr., & Blackwell, T. (in press). Rehabilitation planning with Native Americans. National Association of Rehabilitation Practitioners in the Private Sector.
26.
Martin, W.E., Jr., & Frank, L.W. (1987). An analysis of the labor market participation of American Indians with implications for rehabilitation . In J. C. O'Connell (Ed.), A study of the special problems and needs of American Indians with handicaps both on and off the reservation (Vol. 2, pp. 98-144). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, Institute for Human Development, Native American Research and Training Center. (Available from the American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Institute for Human Development, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 5630, Flagstaff, AZ 86011).
27.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 1988). Dropout rates in the U.S. 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28.
Pedigo, J. (1983). Finding the "meaning" of Native American substance abuse: Implications for prevention. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 61, 273-276.
29.
Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovitz, J.J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149-152.
30.
Ryan, L., & Ryan, R. (1982). Mental health and the urban Indian. Unpublished manuscript.
31.
Spindler, L., & Spindler, G. (1958). Male and female adaptations in culture change . American Anthropologist, 60, 217-233.
32.
Super, D.E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development . In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed.) (pp. 197-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs. (1993). Federally recognized tribes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990a). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1990. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990b). Characteristics of American Indians by tribe and selected areas. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1981). Selected characteristics of occupations defined in the dictionary of occupational titles. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
38.
White, A. (1987). The nature and extent of cooperative efforts by state vocational rehabilitation programs for Indian people who are disabled . In J. C. O'Connell (Ed.), A study of the special problems and needs of American Indians with handicaps both on and off the reservation, Vol. 2 (pp. 146-178). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, Native American Research and training Center and Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Native American Research and Training Center. (Available from the American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, P.O. Box 5630 Flagstaff, AZ 86011).
