Using a sample of 883 Latiné engineering students, the present study explored the measurement characteristics of the Negative Outcome Expectations Scale for Engineers (NOES-E), applying advanced psychometric techniques, including bifactor and the exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) framework, to ascertain the scale’s most suitable factor structure. Additionally, measurement invariance across Latino and Latina participants was tested to investigate if the scale operates equally across gender groups and whether the latent mean scores are invariant. The results suggested that the bi-factor ESEM provided the best model fit when contrasted with other possible factor structures. The findings generally highlighted the general factor as reflecting the negative outcome expectations, suggesting that the use of total score is advised over the use of individual subscale scores. Findings from the measurement invariance testing across men and women indicated the NOES-E score can be compared between both groups.
BanduraA. (1996) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11). Freeman.
3.
Barbosa‐LeikerC.KostickM.LeiM.McPhersonS.RoperV.HoekstraT.WrightB. (2013). Measurement invariance of the perceived stress scale and latent mean differences across gender and time. Stress and Health, 29(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2463
4.
BlusteinD. (2013). The psychology of working: A new perspective for career development, counseling, and public policy. Routledge.
5.
BlusteinD. L.AliS. R.FloresL. Y. (2019). Vocational psychology: Expanding the vision and enhancing the impact. The Counseling Psychologist, 47(2), 166–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019861213
6.
BonifacioL.GushueG. V.Mejia-SmithB. X. (2018). Microaggressions and ethnic identity in the career development of Latina college students. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(4), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018776909
7.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
8.
ChiorriC.MarshH. W.UbbialiA.DonatiD. (2016). Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance across gender of the big five inventory through exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381
FiskeS. T. T.TaylorS. E. (2020). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.
12.
FloresL. Y.MartinezL. D.McGillenG. G.MilordJ. (2019). Something old and something new: Future directions in vocational research with people of color in the United States. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718822461
13.
FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.LeeB. H.HuX.DiazD.MartinezL. (2021a). Social cognitive predictors of latinx and white engineering students’ academic satisfaction and persistence intentions: Exploring interactions among social identities and institutional context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103580
14.
FloresL. Y.SettlesI.McGillenG. G.DavisT. M. (2021b). Critical contributions to scholarship on women and work: Celebrating 50 years of progress and looking ahead to a new decade. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103490
15.
FouadN. A.Byars-WinstonA. (2005). Cultural context of career choice: Meta-analyses of race/ethnicity differences. The Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2005.tb00992.x
16.
FouadN. A.GuillénA. (2006). Outcome expectations: Looking to the past and potential future. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281370
GarriottP. O.NavarroR. L.FloresL. Y.LeeH. S.Carrero PinedoA.SlivenskyD.AtilanoR.LinC. L.GonzalezR.LunaL.LeeB. H. (2019). Surviving and thriving: Voices of Latina/o engineering students at a Hispanic serving institution. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000351
19.
GustafssonJ. E.Aberg-BengtssonL. (2010). Unidimensionality and interpretability of psychological instruments. In EmbretsonS. E. (Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-based approaches (pp. 97–121). American Psychological Association.
20.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.MorinA. J.ForestJ. (2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2638–2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653
21.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
22.
KorkmazO.YamF. C. (2023). What role do visions about future and vocational outcome expectations have on proactive career behaviors? Examining a mediation model on university students. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(2), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.548.5
23.
LeeB.KimY. E. (2024). A comparison of factor structure models for the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) among preschool teachers in South Korea. Current Psychology, 43(5), 4678–4687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04683-1
24.
LeeH. S.FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.SuhH. N. (2018). Development and validation of the negative outcome expectations scale in engineering (NOES-E). Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679923
25.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
26.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36
LentR. W.IrelandG. W.PennL. T.MorrisT. R.SappingtonR. (2017). Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: A test of the social cognitive model of career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.01.002
29.
LentR. W.MorrisT. R.PennL. T.IrelandG. W. (2019). Social–cognitive predictors of career exploration and decision-making: Longitudinal test of the career self-management model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000307
30.
LentR. W.SheuH.-B.MillerM. J.CusickM. E.PennL. T.TruongN. N. (2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243
31.
LittleT. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3
32.
MarshH. W.GuoJ.DickeT.ParkerP. D.CravenR. G. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
33.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227
34.
MarshH. W.MorinA. J. S.ParkerP. D.KaurG. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
35.
MarshH. W.NagengastB.MorinA. J. (2012). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913
36.
MorinA. J.ArensA. K.TranA.CaciH. (2016). Exploring sources of construct‐relevant multidimensionality in psychiatric measurement: A tutorial and illustration using the composite scale of morningness. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25(4), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1485
37.
MorrowS. L.GoreP. A.CampbellB. W. (1996). The application of a sociocognitive framework to the career development of lesbian women and gay men. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0014
ProkofievaM.ZarateD.ParkerA.PalikaraO.StavropoulosV. (2023). Exploratory structural equation modeling: A streamlined step by step approach using the R project software. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 546. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05028-9
40.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
ReiseS. P.BonifayW. E.HavilandM. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
43.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
44.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082
SuR.TayL.LiaoH. Y.ZhangQ.RoundsJ. (2019). Toward a dimensional model of vocational interests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), 690–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000373
47.
SuhH. N.FloresL. Y.Johanson-MurrayR.ParkS.LeeF. Y. (2024). Invisibility and negative career outcome expectations among racially and ethnically diverse college students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Career Assessment, 32(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231173729
48.
TurnerS. L.JoengJ. R.SimsM. D.DadeS. N.ReidM. F. (2019). SES, gender, and STEM career interests, goals, and actions: A test of SCCT. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748665
VriezeS. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
51.
Wilkins-YelK. G.HymanJ.ZounlomeN. O. O. (2019). Linking intersectional invisibility and hypervisibility to experiences of microaggressions among graduate women of color in STEM. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 113, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.018
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
