The existing literature calls for greater clarity on how different job search strategies influence outcomes and wellbeing. In Study 1 (N = 1052; Mage = 25.48; 41.9% females), we developed and validated the Maximizing and Satisficing Job Search Scale (MSJSS). Results demonstrated its associations with existing measures of general maximizing and satisficing tendencies and job search outcomes (e.g., choice regret, number of offers, and outcome satisfaction). Using the MSJSS, based on another sample that was split randomly into a test group (N = 1010; Mage = 25.64; 34.5% females) and a validation group (N = 1010; Mage = 25.63; 35.0% females), Study 2 revealed a 4-profile solution: maximizers, satisficers, neutrals, and adaptive satisficers. Individuals in the maximizers group obtained significantly more job offers than the other groups, whereas the satisficers received the least. Job seekers in the neutrals were the least satisfied and most regretful of the four profiles. The adaptive satisficers reported more job offers and similar levels of outcome satisfaction when compared to the satisficers. Implications for theory, job search practice, and future research are discussed.
AllenM. S.IliescuD.GreiffS. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
3.
BakerA. R. (2019). Implications of financial concerns for college goal commitment among undergraduate stu- dents in the United States. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9467-5
4.
BhattacharyaC. (2015). Should I look for more or not? Construction and assessment of a New Information Search Scale. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1438980847
5.
CheekN. N.SchwartzB. (2016). On the meaning and measurement of maximization. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007257
6.
CheekN. N.WardA. (2019). When choice is a double-edged sword: Understanding maximizers’ paradoxical experiences with choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.004
7.
DahlingJ. J.ThompsonM. N. (2013). Detrimental relations of maximization with academic and career attitudes. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712471
8.
GatiI.LandmanS.DavidovitchS.Asulin-PeretzL.GadassiR. (2010). From career decision-making styles to career decision-making profiles: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.11.001
9.
HughesJ. (2018). Adaptive and maladaptive maximizing: Identifying the correlates, processes, and outcomes of maximizing in decision-making. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo]. UWSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10012/12809
10.
IyengarS. S.LepperM. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
11.
IyengarS. S.WellsR. E.SchwartzB. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x
12.
JonesE.LeeJ. W.PhillipsL. R.ZhangX. E.JaceldoK. B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 50(5), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008
13.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
14.
LaidraK.PullmannH.AllikJ. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.001
15.
LanzaS. T.TanX.BrayB. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.742377
16.
LeachJ. K.PatallE. A. (2013). Maximizing and counterfactual thinking in academic major decision making. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727124751
17.
LuanM.LiH. (2017). Maximization paradox: Result of believing in an objective best. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217695
MisuracaR.FaraciP.GangemiA.CarmeciF. A.MiceliS. (2015). The decision making tendency inventory: A new measure to assess maximizing, satisficing, and minimizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.043
20.
MisuracaR.FasoloB. (2018). Maximizing versus satisficing in the digital age: Disjoint scales and the case for “construct consensus”. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.031
21.
MokK. H.WuA. M. (2016). Higher education, changing labour market and social mobility in the era of massification in China. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1049028
22.
MorinA. J.MeyerJ. P.CreusierJ.BiétryF. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811562
NagyM. S. (2002). Using a single‐item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902167658
25.
NenkovG. Y.MorrinM.WardA.SchwartzB.HullandJ. (2008). A short form of the maximization scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(5), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000395
26.
PayneJ. W.BettmanJ. R.CoupeyE.JohnsonE. J. (1992). A constructive process view of decision making: Multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychologica, 80(1-3), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(92)90043-D
27.
PayneJ. W.BettmanJ. R.JohnsonE. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534
28.
PereraH. N.McIlveenP. (2018). Vocational interest profiles: Profile replicability and relations with the STEM major choice and the big-five. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.11.012
29.
SakaN.GatiI. (2007). Emotional and personality-related aspects of persistent career decision-making difficulties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.003
30.
SchwartzB.WardA.MonterossoJ.LyubomirskyS.WhiteK.LehmanD. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
31.
SpurkD.HirschiA.WangM.ValeroD.KauffeldS. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
32.
StraussK.ParkerS. K. (2018). Intervening to enhance proactivity in organizations: Improving the present or changing the future. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1250–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063156025
VossN. M.LakeC. J.Chlevin‐ThieleC. (2019). Construction and initial validation of the career maximizing scale. The Career Development Quarterly, 67(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12178
35.
WittmerJ. L.MartinJ. E. (2011). Effects of scheduling perceptions on attitudes and mobility in different part-time employee types. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.07.004
