This exploratory sequential mixed-methods paper explores the relationship between gig and taxi drivers’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and their continuance intentions. Drawing from the Career Construction Model of Adaptation, we examined the relationship between drivers’ expectations about AV-related job changes and their intentions to stay or leave their driving role upon the integration of AVs. In Study 1, we collected qualitative data from gig and taxi drivers (N = 69) in 24 focus groups. In Study 2, we administered a survey to gig and taxi drivers (N = 496). The thematic analysis in Study 1 revealed how drivers expected the onset of AVs to positively and negatively impact their job (changes to work stress, safety, job enjoyment, etc.). These expectations influenced their decisions to remain in or leave their jobs. Multivariate regression in Study 2 showed that multiple factors identified in Study 1 were related to continuance intentions, with some being “retention factors” (related to intentions to stay) and others being “turnover factors” (related to intentions to leave). Our findings contribute to the evolving discourse on the impact of new technologies on continuance intentions by offering theoretical and practical implications in careers and vocational behavior.
AgrawalS.SchusterA. M.BrittN.MackE. A.TidwellM. L.CottenS. R. (2023). Building on the past to help prepare the workforce for the future with automated vehicles: A systematic review of automated passenger vehicle deployment timelines. Technology in Society, 72(3), Article 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102186
2.
Al MansooriS.Al-EmranM.ShaalanK. (2024). Factors affecting autonomous vehicles adoption: A systematic review, proposed framework, and future roadmap. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(24), 8397–8418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2286089
3.
AsatianiA.PenttinenE.RuissaloJ.SalovaaraA. (2020). Knowledge workers’ reactions to a planned introduction of robotic process automation—empirical evidence from an accounting firm. In RudyH.ArminH.JensD. (Eds.), Information Systems Outsourcing: The Era of Digital Transformation (pp. 413–452). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
4.
AtkinsonR. D. (2012). US manufacturing decline and economic development prospects. Economic Development Journal, 11(3), 5–11.
5.
BankinsS.JoossS.RestubogS. L. D.MarroneM.OcampoA. C.ShossM. (2024). Navigating career stages in the age of artificial intelligence: A systematic interdisciplinary review and agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 153(1), Article 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104011
6.
BankinsS.OcampoA. C.MarroneM.RestubogS. L. D.WooS. E. (2024). A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2735
7.
BhoopalamA. K.Van den BergR.AgatzN.ChorusC. G. (2023). The long road to automated trucking: Insights from driver focus groups. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 156(1), Article 104351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104351
8.
BlakerK.WhiteL.PoyserW. (2013). Dispensary assistants’ attitudes and perceptions regarding automated dispensing machines in community pharmacies. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 14(1-2), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhtm.2013.055088
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
10.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
11.
BroughamD.HaarJ. (2020). Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161(1), Article 120276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120276
CascioW. F.MontealegreR. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
14.
ChaoG. T.KozlowskiS. W. (1986). Employee perceptions on the implementation of robotic manufacturing technology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.71.1.70
15.
CresswellJ. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
De VosA.Van der HeijdenB. I.AkkermansJ. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117(1), Article 103196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.011
18.
DodelM.MeschG. S. (2020). Perceptions about the impact of automation in the workplace. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1716043
19.
DonaldW. E.Van der HeijdenB. I. J. M.BaruchY. (2024). Introducing a sustainable career ecosystem: Theoretical perspectives, conceptualization, and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 151(1), Article 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103989
20.
DubljevićV.DouglasS.MilojevichJ.AjmeriN.BauerW. A.ListG.SinghM. P. (2023). Moral and social ramifications of autonomous vehicles: A qualitative study of the perceptions of professional drivers. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2022.2070078
21.
FierroL. E.CaianiA.RussoA. (2022). Automation, job polarisation, and structural change. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200(1), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.05.025
22.
FreyC. B.OsborneM. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(1), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
25.
GnambsT.AppelM. (2019). Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.045
26.
GödölleiA. F.BeckJ. W. (2023). Insecure or optimistic? Employees’ diverging appraisals of automation, and consequences for job attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12(1), Article 100342.
27.
GoosM.ManningA.SalomonsA. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. The American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2509
JiangL.LavaysseL. M. (2018). Cognitive and affective job insecurity: A meta-analysis and a primary study. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2307–2342.
30.
LatikkaR.SavelaN.KoivulaA.OksanenA. (2021). Attitudes toward robots as equipment and coworkers and the impact of robot autonomy level. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(7), 1747–1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00743-9
31.
LeeC.HuangG. H.AshfordS. J. (2018). Job insecurity and the changing workplace: Recent developments and the future trends in job insecurity research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 335–359.
32.
LeeH. J.ProbstT. M.BazzoliA.LeeS. (2022). Technology advancements and employees’ qualitative job insecurity in the Republic of Korea: Does training help? Employer-Provided vs. self-paid training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), Article 14368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114368
33.
LefcoeA. D.ConnellyC. E.GellatlyI. R. (2024). Ride-hail drivers, taxi drivers and multiple jobholders: Who takes the most risks and why?Work, Employment & Society, 38(5), 1307–1332. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231185212
34.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.WangR. J.CygrymusE. R.MoturuB. P. (2024). Looking ahead, looking around, and looking to others: Identifying core proactive behaviors in the quest for career sustainability. Journal of Career Assessment, 32(3), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231209777
35.
LohausL.WoideM.DammN.DemiralZ.FriedrichH.PetákováA.WalkerF. (2024). Automated or human: Which driver wins the race for the passengers’ trust? Examining passenger trust in human-driven and automated vehicles following a dangerous situation. Computers in Human Behavior, 161(1), Article 108387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108387
36.
ManyikaJ.LundS.ChuiM.BughinJ.WoetzelJ.BatraP.KoR.SanghviS. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation: 150 (pp. 1–148). McKinsey Global Institute. https://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/444873.
37.
MeissnerA.TrübswetterA.Conti-KufnerA. S.SchmidtlerJ. (2020). Friend or foe? Understanding assembly workers’ acceptance of human-robot collaboration. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3399433
38.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithC. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551.
39.
MilakisD.AremB. v.WeeB. v. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
NamT. (2019b). Technology usage, expected job sustainability, and perceived job insecurity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.017
43.
NazarenoL.SchiffD. S. (2021). The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being. Technology in Society, 67(1), Article 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101679
44.
PettigrewS.FritschiL.NormanR. (2018). The potential implications of autonomous vehicles in and around the workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), Article 1876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091876
45.
PollakA.PaligaM.PulopulosM. M.KozusznikB.KozusznikM. W. (2020). Stress in manual and autonomous modes of collaboration with a cobot. Computers in Human Behavior, 112(1), Article 106469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106469
46.
RaniU.GobelN.DhirR. K. (2022). Is flexibility and autonomy a myth or reality on taxi platforms? Comparison between traditional and app-based taxi drivers in developing countries. In Valerio DeS.IldaD.CharalamposS.MathiasW. (Eds.), A research agenda for the gig economy and society (pp. 167–192). Edward Elgar Publishing.
47.
RudolphC. W.LavigneK. N.ZacherH. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.002
48.
RudolphC. W.ZacherH.HirschiA. (2019). Empirical developments in career construction theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.12.003
49.
SavickasM. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In LentR.W.BrownS.D. (Eds.), Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work (pp. 42–70). John Wiley & Sons.
50.
SavickasM. L.PorfeliE. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
51.
SeifferA.GnewuchU.MaedcheA. (2021, December). Understanding employee responses to software robots: A systematic literature. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (Vol. 2021), Austin, Texas.
52.
SouzaL. M.CastañonJ. A. B. (2021). Public perception of autonomous vehicles: A brief review. Research, Society and Development, 10(16), Article e571101624236. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.24236
53.
SpectorP. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
54.
TaiebatM.BrownA. L.SaffordH. R.QuS.XuM. (2018). A review on energy, environmental, and sustainability implications of connected and automated vehicles. Environmental Science and Technology, 52(20), 11449–11465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00127
55.
TanH.ZhaoX.YangJ. (2022). Exploring the influence of anxiety, pleasure and subjective knowledge on public acceptance of fully autonomous vehicles. Computers in Human Behavior, 131(3), Article 107187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107187
56.
Van FossenJ. A.SchusterA. M.SperryD.CottenS. R.ChangC. H. (2023). Concerns, career decisions, and role changes: A qualitative study of perceptions of autonomous vehicles in the trucking industry. Work, Aging and Retirement, 9(4), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac037
57.
VieitezJ. C.CarcíaA. D. L. T.RodríguezM. T. V. (2001). Perception of job security in a process of technological change: Its influence on psychological well-being. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290120718
58.
WhiteJ. C.RavidD. M.SideritsI. O.BehrendT. S. (2022). An urgent call for IO psychologists to produce timelier technology research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.26
59.
YamK. C.TangP. M.JacksonJ. C.SuR.GrayK. (2023). The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(5), 850–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001045
60.
YankelevichA.RikardR. V.KadylakT.HallM. J.MackE. A.VerboncoeurJ. P.CottenS. R. (2018). Preparing the workforce for automated vehicles (p. 150). American Center for Mobility.
61.
ZhangW.GuanX.ZhouX.LuJ. (2019). The effect of career adaptability on career planning in reaction to automation technology. Career Development International, 24(6), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-05-2018-0135
62.
ZhangX.JinH. (2023). How does smart technology, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, and algorithms (STAARA) awareness affect hotel employees’ career perceptions? A disruptive innovation theory perspective. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2166186
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
