Over the past half-century, Holland’s RIASEC model has dominated vocational interest research. Although the RIASEC categories effectively capture general occupational themes, their breadth obscures meaningful variability across underlying basic interests, which are more refined interest scales. In this research, we adapted the Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests (CABIN; Su et ., 2019) to be used alongside O*NET for assessing interest fit, resulting in the 60-item CABIN-NET that measures 20 basic interest scales organized under RIASEC domains. In Study 1, we refined items for the CABIN-NET using a nationally representative adult sample (N = 768). In Studies 2 and 3, we collected extensive reliability and validity evidence using longitudinal samples of graduates from four-year universities (N = 816) and community colleges (N = 560). Across samples, results consistently showed that basic interest fit had stronger predictive power for career outcomes compared to RIASEC fit. Overall, the CABIN-NET provides a short, reliable measure of both basic interests and RIASEC interests, offering two ways of assessing person-occupation fit and balancing bandwidth and fidelity. The CABIN-NET also offers a new content-based connection between basic interests and occupational knowledge, providing theoretical and practical implications for incorporating basic interests into person-environment fit research and applications.
AckermanP. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22(2), 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(96)90016-1
2.
AllenJ.RobbinsS. (2010). Effects of interest–major congruence, motivation, and academic performance on timely degree attainment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017267
3.
ArmstrongP. I.DayS. X.McVayJ. P.RoundsJ. (2008). Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1
4.
ArmstrongP. I.SmithT. J.DonnayD. A. C.RoundsJ. (2004). The strong ring: A basic interest model of occupational structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.299
5.
BaiL.LiaoH. Y. (2019). The relation between interest congruence and college major satisfaction: Evidence from the basic interest measures. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(4), 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718793966
6.
BrayfieldA. H.RotheH. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617
7.
CableD. M.DeRueD. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
8.
CampbellD. P.BorgenF. H.EastesS. H.JohanssonC. B.PetersonR. A. (1968). A set of basic interest scales for the Strong Vocational Interest Blank for men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(6, Pt.2), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026495
9.
ChuC.RussellM. T.HoffK. A.Jonathan PhanW. M.RoundsJ. (2022). What do interest inventories measure? The convergence and content validity of four RIASEC inventories. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(4), 776–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727221081554
10.
ClarkK. E. (1961). Vocational interests of nonprofessional men. University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CostanzaD. P.FleishmanE. A.Marshall-MiesJ. (1999). Knowledges. In PetersonN. G.MumfordM. D.BormanW. C.JeanneretP. R.FleishmanE. A. (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 71–90). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10313-005
12.
DonnayD. A.MorrisM. L.SchaubhutN. A.ThompsonR. C. (2004). Strong Interest Inventory manual: Research, development, and strategies for interpretation. Consulting Psychologists Press Incorporated.
13.
FarooqR. (2022). Heywood cases: Possible causes and solutions. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 14(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDATS.2022.121506
14.
GregorM. A.PinoH. V. G. D.GonzalezA.SotoS.DunnM. G. (2020). Understanding the career aspirations of diverse community college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719849872
15.
HannaA.RoundsJ. (2020). How accurate are interest inventories? A quantitative review of career choice hit rates. Psychological Bulletin, 146(9), 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000269
16.
HoffK. A.SongQ. C.WeeC. J.PhanW. M. J.RoundsJ. (2020). Interest fit and job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 123(4), 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103503
17.
HollandJ. L. (1973). Making vocational choices. Prentice Hall.
18.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
19.
HylandW. E.HoffK. A.RoundsJ. (2022). Interest–ability profiles: An integrative Approach to knowledge Acquisition. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030043
20.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E.LockeE. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.237
21.
LeH.RobbinsS. B.WestrickP. (2014). Predicting student enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 915–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035998
22.
LiuZ.HoffK. A.ChuC.OswaldF. L.RoundsJ. (2024). Toward whole-person fit assessment: Integrating interests, values, skills, knowledge, and personality using the Occupational Information Network (O*NET). Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001232
23.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227
24.
MarshH. W.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
25.
National Center for O*NETDevelopment (2025). O*NET OnLine. Retrieved February 24, 2025, fromhttps://www.onetonline.org/
26.
NautaM. M. (2007). Assessing college students' satisfaction with their academic majors. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(4), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707305762
27.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
28.
NyeC. D.PrasadJ.RoundsJ. (2021). The effects of vocational interests on motivation, satisfaction, and academic performance: Test of a mediated model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127(4), 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103583
29.
NyeC. D.SuR.RoundsJ.DrasgowF. (2012). Vocational interests and performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612449021
30.
NyeC. D.SuR.RoundsJ.DrasgowF. (2017). Interest congruence and performance: Revisiting recent meta-analytic findings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.11.002
31.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
32.
RalstonC. A.BorgenF. H.RottinghausP. J.DonnayD. A. C. (2004). Specificity in interest measurement: Basic interest scales and major field of study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00096-4
33.
ReeveC. L.HakelM. D. (2000). Toward an understanding of adult intellectual development: Investigating within-individual convergence of interest and knowledge profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.897
34.
RenningerK. A.HidiS. E. (2022). Interest: A unique affective and cognitive motivational variable that develops. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (9, pp. 179–239). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2021.12.004
35.
RoundsJ. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses. In LubinskiD. J.DawisR. V. (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 177–232). Davies-Black Publishing.
RoundsJ.PutkaD. J.LewisP. (2022). Updating vocational interests information for the O*NET content model. U.S. Department of Labor National O*NET Resource Center. https://www.onetcenter.org/reports/Voc_Interests.html
RoundsJ.TraceyT. J.HubertL. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(92)90073-9
40.
SuR. (2020). The three faces of interests: An integrative review of interest research in vocational, organizational, and educational psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116(2), 103240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.016
41.
SuR.TayL.LiaoH.ZhangQ.RoundsJ. (2019). Toward a dimensional model of vocational interests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), 690–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000373
42.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
TraceyT. J.RobbinsS. B. (2006). The interest–major congruence and college success relation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.11.003
45.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2018) Employment and Training Administration O*NET® Data Collection Program, 2018. Office of Management and Budget clearance package supporting statement Part A: Justification. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from:https://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/omb2018/Supporting_StatementA.pdf
46.
Van IddekingeC. H.PutkaD. J.CampbellJ. P. (2011). Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: The validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021193
47.
WarlickC. A.IngramP. B.TernesM. S.KrieshokT. S. (2018). An investigation into the structural form of the O*NET–Interest Profiler–short form. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(3), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717714544
48.
XuH.LiH. (2020). Operationalize interest congruence: A comparative examination of four approaches. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(4), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720909825
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
