Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-2
Development and Validation of the “Career Confidence for Activities in the Future” to Assess Italian Adolescents’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Handling Global Challenges
This paper reports the development and psychometric requisites of the Career Confidence for Activities in the Future (CCAF). This scale of 25 items assesses adolescents’ self-efficacy beliefs about the capacity to learn and execute professional activities necessary to handle six global challenges. These are the safeguard of the environment and life on the planet, health and well-being of all the people, fair and sustainable economic development, the use of technology for the benefit of all, the construction of right-conscious and inclusive societies, and the valorization of culture and education to cosmopolitanism. Two studies were carried out. Study 1 included 706 adolescents (Mage = 17.39; SD = 0.81; 31.9% male and 67.8% female) and examined the factor structure through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Additionally, this study examined the convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire with measures of career adaptability and the propensity to sustainability in making decisions about one’s future. Study 2 included 706 adolescents (Mage = 17.31; SD = 0.89; 50% male and 50% female) and provided measurement invariance across genders. Results supported the use of the CCAF in career guidance activities to encourage adolescents to positively contribute to handling the six global challenges considered.
AroraG.AggarwalD. J. (2020). Cosmopolitanism and clothing interest determinants amongst college students of Delhi. Fashion Practice, 12(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1769352
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
3.
BlusteinD. L.ThompsonM. N.KozanS.AllanB. A. (2021). Intersecting losses and integrative practices: Work and mental health during the COVID-19 era and beyond. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 52(5), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000425
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structutal Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
5.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. B. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.309
6.
CoffeyY.BhullarN.DurkinJ.IslamM. S.UsherK. (2021). Understanding eco-anxiety: A systematic scoping review of current literature and identified knowledge gaps. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 3(14), 100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100047
7.
DemirciS.TeksözG. (2017). Self-efficacy beliefs on integrating sustainability into profession and daily life: In the words of university students. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 116–133. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2893401
8.
DoğruM. (2017). Development of a self-efficacy scale of technology usage in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1785–1798. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1204a
9.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272
10.
FreyC. B.OsborneM. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(1), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
11.
García-FeijooM.EizaguirreA.Rica-AspiunzaA. (2020). Systematic review of sustainable-development-goal deployment in business schools. Sustainability, 12(1), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010440
12.
GershenfeldN.GershenfeldA.Cutcher-GershenfeldJ. (2017). Designing reality: How to survive and thrive in the third digital revolution. Basic Books.
13.
GlennJ. C.FlorescuE.The Millenium Project Team. (2017). State of the future 19.1. The Millennium Project.
14.
GuichardJ. (2022). From career guidance to designing lives acting for fair and sustainable development. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 22(3), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-022-09530-6
15.
HamannK. R. S.WullenkordM. C.van ZomerenM. (2023). Believing that we can change our world for the better: A triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) framework of self-efficacy beliefs in the contect of collective social and ecological aims. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(1), 11–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231178056
16.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
JeffersonL.GolderS.EssexH.DaleV.BloorK. (2023). Exploring gender differences in uptake of GP partnership roles: A qualitative mixed-methods study. British Journal of General Practice, 73(732), e545–e555. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0544
18.
JuvonenJ.LessardL. M.RastogiR.SchacterH. L.SmithD. S. (2019). Promoting social inclusion in educational settings: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645
19.
KwonK.Ottenbreit-LeftwichA. T.SariA. R.KhlaifZ.ZhuM.NadirH.GokF. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: Exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. TechTrends, 63(6), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5
20.
LawranceE. L.ThompsonR.Newberry Le VayJ.PageL.JenningsN. (2022). The impact of climate change on mental health and emotional wellbeing: A narrative review of current evidence, and its implications. International Review of Psychiatry, 34(5), 443–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2022.2128725
21.
LentR. W. (2016). Self-efficacy in a relational world: Social cognitive mechanisms of adaptation and development. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(4), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016638742
22.
LittleT. D. (1997). Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3
23.
McWhirterE. H.McWha-HermannI. (2021). Social justice and career development: Progress, problems, and possibilities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126(10), 103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103492
24.
MeđugoracV.ŠverkoI.BabarovićT. (2020). Careers in sustainability: An application of social cognitive career theory. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 20(3), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-019-09413-3
Mohd MahudinN. D.CoxT.GriffithsA. (2012). Measuring rail passenger crowding: Scale development and psychometric properties. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.006
27.
MorgadoF. F. R.MeirelesJ. F. F.NevesC. M.AmaralA. C. S.FerreireM. E. C. (2017). Scale development: Ten main limintations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
28.
NotaL.SoresiS.Di MaggioI.SantilliS.GinevraM. C. (2020). Sustainable development, career counselling and career education. Springer.
29.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
PlantP. (2014). Green guidance. In ArulmaniG.BakshiA. J.LeongF. T. L.WattsA. G. (Éds.), Handbook of career development (pp. 309–316). Springer.
32.
PolackoM. (2021). Causes and consequences of income inequality–an overview.Statistics, Politics and Policy, 12(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2021-0017
33.
RaniP. S.ChavaN. (2021). Secondary school teacher’s stress towards online teaching. In JacobD.NirmalaC.LathaK. V. (Eds.), Pedagogy and praxis (pp. 72–79). St. Ann’s College of Education.
34.
RichardsonK.SteffenW.LuchtW.BendtsenJ.CornellS. E.DongesJ. F.DrükeM.FetzerI.BalaG.von BlohW.FeulnerG.FiedlerS.GertenD.GleesonT.HofmannM.HuiskampW.KummuM.MohanC.Nogués-BravoD.RockströmJ. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37), Article eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
35.
RieflerP.DiamantopoulosA. (2009). Consumer cosmopolitanism: Review and replication of the CYMYC scale. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.041
36.
RochatS.RossierJ. (2023). Toward a squared sustainable work: Placing ecological and human sustainability at the heart of the future of work. In BlusteinD. L.FloresL. Y. (Eds.), Rethinking work: Essays on building a better workplace (pp. 192–196). Routledge.
37.
RockströmJ.SteffenW.NooneK.PerssonÅ.ChapinS.LambinE. F.LentonT. M.SchefferM.FolkeC.SchellnhuberH. J.NykvistB.de WitC. A.HughesT.van der LeeuwS.RodheH.SörlinS.SnyderP. K.CostanzaR.SvedinU.FoleyJ. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32–65. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-03180-140232, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268316
38.
RussellE.DanielsK. (2018). Measuring affective well-being at work using short-form scales: Implications for affective structures and participant instructions. Human Relations, 71(11), 1478–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717751034
39.
SantilliS.GinevraM. C.Di MaggioI.SoresiS.NotaL. (2023). Construction and initial validation of the scale “goals for future design of the 2030 Agenda”. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-023-09626-7
40.
SavickasM. L.NotaL.RossierJ.DauwalderJ. P.DuarteM. E.GuichardJ.SoresiS.Van EsbroeckR.van VianenA. E. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004
41.
SavickasM. L.PorfeliE. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
SchwabK. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution.World Economic Forum.
44.
SoresiS.NotaL.FerrariL. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale-Italian form: Psychometric properties and relationships to breadth of interests, quality of life, and perceived barriers. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 80(3), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.020
45.
TaylorK. M.BetzN. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(83)90006-4
46.
ThomaesS.GrapsasS.van de WeteringJ.SpitzerJ.PoorthuisA. (2023). Green teens: Understanding and promoting adolescents’ sustainable engagement. One Earth, 6(4), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.006
VeraldiR.OddoG. (2024). Partecipazione, democrazia e politica sostenibile: una prima lettura [Participation, democracy and sustainable politics: A first reading]. Science & Philosophy, 12(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v12i1.1570
50.
WaiJ.HalpernD. F. (2018). The impact of changing norms on creativity in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618773326
51.
Wai YoongS.BojeiJ.OsmanS.HashimN. H. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy and its role in fostering pro-environmental attitude and behaviours. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(2), 151–186. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol11no2.5
52.
Wan HussainW. N. H.HalimL.ChanM. Y.Abd RahmanN. (2021). Predicting energy-saving behaviour based on environmental values: An analysis of school children’s perspectives. Sustainability, 13(14), 7644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147644
WrightB.OgbuehiA. O. (2014). Surveying adolescents: The impact of data collection methodology on response quality. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 12(1), 41–53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
