Although conceptualized as a multidimensional construct, the majority of measures of calling are unidimensional. In order to further expand the operationalization of calling, this study developed and validated a measure of the three dimensions of calling, namely, craftsmanship, kinship, and serving using three separate samples. Using a sample of 85 undergraduate students, the pilot study established content validity for the three dimensions of calling. Study 1 aimed to refine the developed measure while assessing its dimensionality across 379 participants from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Furthermore, Study 2 provided evidence of construct and criterion-related validity, as well as test-retest reliability over a period of 3 months across 301 MTurk participants. Recommendations for future research utilizing the more focused dimensions of calling are discussed.
AllanB. A.DouglassR. P.DuffyR. D.McCartyR. J. (2016). Meaningful work as a moderator of the relation between work stress and meaning in life. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599357
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2014). The winding road from the late teens through the twenties: Emerging adulthood. Oxford Scholarship Online.
3.
AryeeS.ChenZ. X.SunL. Y.DebrahY. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
4.
AutinK. L.AllanB. A.PalaniappanM.DuffyR. D. (2017). Career calling in India and the United States: A cross-cultural measurement study. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(4), 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716665860
5.
AveyJ. B.LuthansF.YoussefC. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308329961
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
7.
BellahR. N.MadsenR. W.SullivanM.SwidlerA.TiptonS. M. (Eds.). (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
BellahR. N.SullivanW. M.TiptonS. M.SwidlerA.MadsenR. P. (1985). Habits of the heart. University of California Press.
BentlerP. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
11.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/e527772014-223
12.
BundersonJ. S.ThompsonJ. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32
13.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
CheungJ. H.BurnsD. K.SinclairR. R.SliterM. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5
16.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
17.
ChoiY. E.ChoE.JungH. J.SohnY. W. (2018). Calling as a predictor of life satisfaction: The roles of psychological capital, work–family enrichment, and boundary management strategy. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717723092
18.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). NJ: Erlbaum: Hillsdale.
19.
DikB. J.DuffyR. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(3), 424–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008316430
20.
DikB. J.EldridgeB. M.StegerM. F.DuffyR. D. (2012). Development and validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale (BCS). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711434410.
21.
DikB.J.ShimizuA.B. (2019). Multiple meanings of calling: Next steps for studying an evolving construct. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748676
22.
DuffyR. J.DikB. J.DouglassR. P.EnglandJ. W.VelezB. L. (2018). Work as a calling: A theoretical model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(4), 423-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000276.
23.
EbyL. T.DurleyJ. R.EvansS. C.RaginsB. R. (2008). Mentors' perceptions of negative mentoring experiences: Scale development and nomological validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.358
24.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272
25.
FanX.ThompsonB.WangL. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119
26.
FossenR. S.VredenburghD. J. (2014). Exploring differences in work’s meaning: An investigation of individual attributes associated with work orientations. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15(2), 101–120.
27.
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417.
28.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
29.
HagmaierT.AbeleA. E. (2012). The multidimensionality of calling: Conceptualization, measurement and a bicultural perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.04.001.
30.
HagmaierT.AbeleA. E. (2015). When reality meets ideal: Investigating the relation between calling and life satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714547164
31.
Haski-LeventhalD.McLeighJ.D. (2009). Firefighters volunteering beyond their duty: An essential asset in rural communities. Journal of Rural Community Development, 4(12), 80–92.
32.
HinkinT. R.TraceyJ. B. (1999). An analysis of variance approach to content validation. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819922004
33.
HirschiA. (2011). Callings in career: A typological approach to essential and optional components. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 60–73. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.002
34.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
35.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
36.
HunterI.DikB. J.BanningJ. H. (2010). College students’ perceptions of calling in work and life: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.008
37.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
38.
LambertC. E.ArbuckleS. A.HoldenR. R. (2016). The Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale outperforms the BIDR impression management scale for identifying fakers. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.004.
39.
LeeK.AllenN. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131
40.
Littman-OvadiaH.LavyS. (2016). Going the extra mile: Perseverance as a key character strength at work. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715580322
41.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyL. J.ParfyonovaN. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.002
42.
MorgesonF. P.HumphreyS. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
43.
Omilion-HodgesL. M.BakerC. R. (2013). Contextualizing LMX within the workgroup: The effects of LMX and justice on relationship quality and resource sharing among peers. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 935–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.004
44.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
45.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
46.
ParkJ.SohnY. W.HaY. J. (2016). South Korean salespersons’ calling, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599354
47.
PittmanM.SheehanK. (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a digital sweatshop? Transparency and accountability in crowdsourced online research. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(4), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2016.1228811
48.
PrattM. G.PradiesC.LepistoD. A. (2013). Doing well, doing good, and doing with: Organizational practices for effectively cultivating meaningful work. In DikB.ByrneZ.StegerM. (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 173–196). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14183-009
RossoB. D.DekasK. H.WrzesniewskiA. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001.
SawhneyG.MichelJ. S. (2022). Challenge and hindrance stressors and work outcomes: The moderating role of day-level affect. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09752-5
54.
SawhneyG.BrittT. W.WilsonC. (2020). Perceiving a calling as a predictor of future work attitudes: The moderating role of meaningful work. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719848981.
55.
SawhneyG.SinclairR. R.CoxA. R.MuncA. H.SliterM. T. (2018). One climate or many: Examining the structural distinctiveness of safety, health, and stress prevention climate measures. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(11), 1015-1025. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001413.
56.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
57.
SheehanK.PittmanM. (2016). Amazon’s mechanical Turk for academics: The HIT handbook for social science research. Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh.
58.
SpectorP. E. (2021). Mastering the use of control variables: The hierarchical iterative control (HIC) approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(5), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09709-0
59.
StegerM. F.DikB. J.DuffyR. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
60.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180.
61.
TangT. L. P.KimJ. K.TangT. L. N. (2002). Endorsement of the money ethic, income, and life satisfaction: A comparison of full‐time employees, part time employees, and non employed university students. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
62.
TerkelS. (1995). Working. Ballantine Books.
63.
ThompsonJ. ABundersonJ. S. (2019). Research on work as a calling…and how to make it matter. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015140.
64.
ThorsteinsonT. J. (2003). Job attitudes of part time vs. full time workers: A meta analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(2), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903765913687
65.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
66.
WebsterB. D.EdwardsB. D. (2019). Does holding a second job viewed as a calling impact one’s work at the primary job?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 114, 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.010.
67.
WrzesniewskiA.McCauleyC.RozinP.SchwartzB. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2162
68.
WrzesniewskiA. E. (1999). Jobs, careers, and callings: Work orientation and job transitions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
69.
XanthopoulouD.BakerA. B.HeuvenE.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.345
70.
XieB.ZhouW.HuangJ. L.XiaM. (2017). Using goal facilitation theory to explain the relationships between calling and organization-directed citizenship behavior and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.001.
71.
ZhaoN.ZhouG. (2020). Social media use and mental health during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 12(4), 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12226
