Women’s departure or nonentrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professions, particularly engineering, has been a lively source of scholarly inquiry for the past three decades. Much of the literature in this area has been with solely female samples of participants, begging the question as to whether or not men and women either choose to leave the profession or not enter for the same or similar reasons. This present study collected a large sample of men (n = 1,273) who had either left or never entered the engineering profession and compared their responses to a large sample of women (n = 1,235) on a set of categorical response variables. Using the perspective of the Theory of Work Adjustment, our results suggest that there are gender differences in reasons for departure, raising the possibility that engineering climates differentially reinforce needs for men and women. Implications of this research are discussed.
BlickenstaffJ. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?Gender and Education, 17, 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
2.
BorgenF. H.WeissD. J.TinsleyH. E. A.DawisR. V.LofquistL. H. (1968). The measurement of occupational reinforcer patterns. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 25.
3.
BuseK.BilimoriaD.PerelliS. (2013). Why they stay: Women persisting in US engineering careers. Career Development International, 18, 139–154. doi:10.1108/CDI-11-2012-0108
4.
CardadorM. T.HillP. L. (2018). Career paths in engineering firms. Journal of Career Assessment, 26, 95–110. doi:10.1177/1069072716679987
5.
DawisR. V.LofquistL. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual differences model and its application. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
6.
DawisR. V. (2005). The Minnesota theory of work adjustment. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 3–23). New York: Wiley.
7.
EggerthD. E.FlynnM. A. (2012). Applying the theory of work adjustment to Latino immigrant workers: An exploratory study. Journal of Career Development, 39, 76–68. doi:10.1177/0894845311417129
8.
FeldmanD. C.NgT. W. H. (2007). Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success. Journal of Management, 33, 350–377. doi: 10.1177/0149206307300815
9.
FouadN. A.ChangW.WanM.SinghR. (2017). Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 875. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875
10.
FouadN. A.FitzpatrickM. E.LiuJ. P. (2011). Persistence of women in engineering: A qualitative study. Journal of Women in Math, Science and Engineering, 17, 69–96. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v17.i1.60
11.
FouadN. A.SinghR.CappaertK.ChangW.WanM. (2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002
12.
GayE. G.WeissD. J.HendelD. D.DawisR. V.LofquistL. H. (1971). Manual for the Minnesota importance questionnaire. Minneapolis: Work Adjustment Project, Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation.
13.
HeskethB.McLachlanK.GardnerD. (1992). Work adjustment theory: An empirical test using a fuzzy rating scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 318–337.
14.
JuntunenC. L.EvenC. E. (2012). Theories of vocational psychology. In FouadN. A.CarterJ. A.SubichL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of counseling psychology: Vol. 1. Theories, Research, and Methods (pp. 237–267). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13754-009
15.
KimJ. Y.FitzsimonsG. M.KayA. C. (2018). Lean in messages increase attributions of women’s responsibility for gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 974–1001. doi:10.1037/pspa0000129
16.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
17.
LichtensteinG.LoshbaughH. G.ClaarB.ChenH. L.JacksonK.SheppardS. D. (2009). An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 227–234. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01021.x
18.
LyonsH. Z.VelezB. L.MehtaM.NeillN. (2014). Tests of the theory of work adjustment with economically distressed African Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 473. doi:10.1037/cou0000017
19.
McCloyR.WaughG.MedskerG.WallJ.RivkinD.LewisP. (1999). Development of the O*Net computerized work importance profiler. Retrieved fromhttp://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/DevCWIP.p
20.
National Academies of Engineering. (2019). Understanding the educational and career pathways of engineers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
21.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017(Special Report No. NSF 17-310). Arlington, VA: Author.
22.
OstroffC. (2012). Person-environment fit in organizational settings. In KozlowskiS. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 373–408). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0012
23.
RogersM. E.CreedP. A.SearleJ.HartungP. J. (2011). The Physician Values in Practice Scale-short form: Development and initial validation. Journal of Career Development, 38, 111–127. doi:10.1177/0894845310363593
24.
RoundsJ. B.HenleyG. A.DawisR. V.LofquistL. H.WeissD. J. (1981). Manual for the Minnesota importance questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
25.
SandbergS. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead (1st ed.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
26.
SinghR.FouadN. A.FitzpatrickM. E.LiuJ. P.CappaertK. J.FiguereidoC. (2013). Stemming the tide: Predicting women engineers’ intention to leave. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 281–294. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.05.007
27.
SinghR.ZhangY.WanM.FouadN. A. (2018). Why do women engineers leave the engineering profession? The roles of work–family conflict, occupational commitment, and perceived organizational support. Human Resource Management, 57, 901–914. doi:10.1002/hrm.21900
SwansonJ. L.SchneiderM. (2013). Minnesota theory of work adjustment. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 29–53). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
30.
ToosiN. R.MorS.Semnani-AzadZ.PhillipsK. W.AmanatullahE. T. (2019). Who can lean in? The intersecting role of race and gender in negotiations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 7–21. doi:10.1177/0361684318800492
