This study examined the beneficial role of social self-efficacy (SSE) in relation to the important workplace outcomes of job satisfaction and task performance. We proposed and tested a model in which social status functioned as a mediator of the above relationships. Participants were 172 employees from diverse industries in China, who self-reported their SSE and job satisfaction. Each participant had three coworkers who provided peer ratings of his or her social status and task performance. Results based on structural equation modeling indicated that SSE positively related to social status, which in turn positively related to both job satisfaction and task performance. Consistent with our prediction, social status was found to mediate the above relationships. Implications for career development practices were discussed.
AdlerA. (1930). The education of children. New York, NY: Greenberg.
2.
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD.KringA. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.116
3.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. doi:10.1037/a0014201
4.
AndersonC.SrivastavaS.BeerJ. S.SpataroS. E.ChatmanJ. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094–1110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1 094
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
6.
BanduraA.PastorelliC.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 258–269. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.258
7.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
8.
BergerJ.CohenB. P.ZelditchM.Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. doi:10.2307/2093465
9.
BergerJ.RosenholtzS. J.ZelditchM. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.002403
10.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK.KozlowskiS. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BowlingN. A.HammondG. D. (2008). A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire job satisfaction subscale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 63–77. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004
13.
BrislinR. (1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behaviour. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace College.
14.
BundersonJ. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557–591. doi:10.2307/3556637
15.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33, 261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
16.
CammannC.FichmanM.JenkinsG. D.KleshJ. (1983). Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. In SeashoreS. E.LawlerE. E.MirvisP. H.CammannC. (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71–138). New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
CaspiA.BernD. J. (1990). Personality continuity and change across the life course. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 549–575). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
ChatmanJ. A.BoisnierA. D.SpataroS. E.AndersonC.BerdahlJ. L. (2008). Being distinctive versus being conspicuous: The effects of numeric status and sex-stereotyped tasks on individual performance in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 141–160. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.006
19.
ChiaburuD. S.HarrisonD. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1082–1103. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
20.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
21.
CullenK. L.FanJ.LiuC. (2014). Employee popularity mediates the relationship between political skill and workplace interpersonal mistreatment. Journal of Management, 40, 1760–1778. doi:10.1177/0149206311435104
22.
DawisR. V.LofquistL. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
DemingD. J. (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132, 1593–1640. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx022
24.
FanJ.LitchfieldR. C.IslamS.WeinerB.AlexanderM.LiuC.KulviwatS. (2013). Workplace social self-efficacy: Concept, measure, and initial validity evidence. Journal of Career Assessment, 21, 91–110. doi:10.1177/1069072712454702
25.
FanJ.MengH.GaoX.LopezF. J.LiuC. (2010). Validation of a U.S. adult social self-efficacy inventory in Chinese populations. The Counseling Psychology, 38, 473–496. doi:10.1177/0011000009352514
26.
FanJ.MengH.ZhaoB.PatelT. (2012). Further validation of a U.S. adult social self-efficacy inventory in Chinese populations. Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 463–478. doi:10.1177/1069072712450006
27.
FarisR.FelmleeD. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73. doi:10.1177/0003122410396196
28.
FengD.SuS.YangY.XiaJ.SuY. (2017). Job satisfaction mediates subjective social status and turnover intention among Chinese nurses. Nursing & Health Sciences, 19, 388–392. doi:10.1111/nhs.12357
29.
FerrisG. R.Perrewe′P. L.DouglasC. (2002). Social effectiveness in organizations: Construct validity and research questions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9, 49–63. doi:10.1177/107179190200900104
30.
FlynnF. J.ReagansR. E.AmanatullahE. T.AmesD. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123–1137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123
31.
GuJ.MengH.FanJ. (2014). Social self-efficacy: Dimension, measurement and its mechanisms. Advances in Psychological Science, 22, 1791–1800. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01791
32.
HardyC. L.Van VugtM. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413. doi:10.1177/0146167206291006
33.
HausserJ. A.MojzischA.NieselM.Schulz-HardtS. (2010). Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work & Stress, 24, 1–35. doi:10.1080/02678371003683747
34.
HermannK. S. (2005). The influence of social self-efficacy, self-esteem, and personality differences on loneliness and depression (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
35.
HerzbergF.MausnerB.SnydermanB. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
36.
HoganR. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In PageM. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1982: Personality—Current theory and research (pp. 55–89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
37.
IlgenD. R.PulakosE. D. (1999). Introduction: Employee performance in today’s organization. In IlgenD. R.PulakosE. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 1–18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within group inter-rater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
39.
KarasekR. A. (1998). Demand/control model: A social, emotional, and physiological approach to stress risk and active behaviour development. In StellmanJ. M. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety (pp. 34.6–34.14). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
KeltnerD.Van KleefG. A.ChenS.KrausM. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 151–192. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00003-2
42.
KemperT. D. (1993). Sociological models in the explanation of emotions. In LewisM.HavilandJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 41–51). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
KennedyJ. A.AndersonC.MooreD. A. (2013). When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 122, 266–279. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.005
44.
LevyD. A.CollinsB. E.NailP. R. (1998). A new model of interpersonal influence characteristics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 715–733.
45.
LiC.ShiX.DangJ. (2014). Online communication and subjective well-being in Chinese college students: The mediating role of shyness and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.032
46.
LucasJ. W. (1999). Behavioral and emotional outcomes of leadership in task groups. Social Forces, 78, 747–779. doi:10.2307/3005574
47.
LucasJ. W.LovagliaM. J. (1998). Leadership status, gender, group size, and emotion in face-to-face groups. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 617–637. doi:10.2307/1389566
48.
LukaszewskiA. W.SimmonsZ. L.AndersonC.RoneyJ. R. (2015). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 385–406. doi:10.1037/pspi0000042
49.
MengH.HuangP.HouN.FanJ. (2015). Social self-efficacy predicts Chinese college students’ first-year transition: A four-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Career Assessment, 23, 410–426. doi:10.1177/1069072714547482
50.
OstbergV. (2003). Children in classrooms: Peer status, status distribution and mental well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 17–29. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00006-0
51.
ParkJ.SohnY. W.HaY. J. (2016). South Korean salespersons’ calling, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 24, 415–428. doi:10.1177/1069072715599354
52.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
53.
ScottB. A. (2013). A conceptual framework for the study of popularity in the workplace. Organizational Psychology Review, 3, 161–186. doi:10.1177/2041386612464092
54.
ScottB. A.JudgeT. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 20–33. doi:10.1037/a0012951
55.
SegrinCTaylorM. (2007). Positive interpersonal relationships mediate the association between social skills and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 637–646. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.017
56.
SeibertS. E.KraimerM. L.LidenR. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219–237. doi:10.2307/3069452
57.
SmithH. M.BetzN. E. (2000). Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 8, 283–301. doi:10.1177/106907270000800306
58.
ThibaultJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
59.
TsuiA. S.PearceJ. L.PorterL. W.TripoliA. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to employee-organization relationships: Does investment in employees pay off?Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121. doi:10.2307/256928
60.
Van DyneL.LePineJ. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. doi:10.2307/256902
61.
WangH.LawK.S.HackettR. D.WangD.ChenZ. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420–432. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407908
62.
WillerR. (2009). A status theory of collective action. Advances in Group Processes, 26, 189–190. doi:10.1108/S0882-6145(2009)0000026009
63.
WolfM. G. (1970). Need gratification theory: A theoretical reformulation of job satisfaction/dissatisfaction and job motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 87–94. doi:10.1037/h0028664
