This study examined negative stereotypes of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals as predictors of math/science interests and career goals in a sample of high school students. In a scale development study, results of an exploratory factor analysis (N = 341) indicated a single-factor structure best represented items for the Math and Science Stigma (MASS) Scale—a measure of negative stereotypes of STEM professionals. In a follow-up study, structural equation modeling was used to confirm the factor structure of the MASS. Further analyses showed that a model with STEM stereotypes depicted as a proximal contextual barrier to math/science career interests and goals fit the data well. STEM stereotypes were a significant predictor of math/science self-efficacy, math/science self-efficacy was a significant predictor of math/science interests, and interests predicted math/science career goals. The relationship between STEM stereotypes and math/science interests was explained by self-efficacy. Results are discussed in terms of decreasing negative stereotypes of STEM professionals and enhancing high school students’ interests in STEM careers.
AndereggD. (2007). Nerds: Who they are and why we need more of them. London, England: Penguin.
5.
AschbacherP. R.LiE.RothE. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 47, 564–582. doi:10.1002/tea.20353
6.
BandalosD. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78–102. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
7.
BarbercheckM. (2001). Mixed messages: Men and women in advertisements in science. In WyerM.BarbercheckM.GeismanD.OzturkH. O.WayneM. (Eds.), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 117–131). London, England: Routledge.
8.
BetzN. E.WolfeJ. B. (2005). Measuring confidence for basic domains of vocational activity in high school students. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 251–272. doi:10.1177/1069072705274951
9.
ChenX.SoldnerM. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
10.
CheryanS.PlautV. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63, 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x
11.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
12.
CheryanS.SiyJ. O.VichayapaiM.DruryB. J.KimS. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218
13.
DeemerE. D.LinC.GrahamR.SotoC. (2016). Development and validation of a measure of threatening gender stereotypes in science: A factor mixture analysis. Journal of Career Assessment, 24, 145–161. doi:10.1177/1069072714565772
14.
GarriottP. O.FloresL. Y.MartensM. P. (2013). Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first generation college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 200–210. doi:10.1037/a0032074
15.
GarriottP. O.FloresL. Y.PrabhakarB.MazzottaE.LiskovA.ShapiroJ. (2014). Parental support and underrepresented students’ math/science interests: The mediating role of learning experiences. Journal of Career Assessment, 22, 627–641. doi:10.1177/1069072713514933
16.
GottfriedA. E.FlemingJ. S.GottfriedA. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.
17.
GottfriedA. E.MarcoulidesG. A.GottfriedA. W.OliverP. H.GuerinD. W. (2007). Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 317–327.
18.
GrewalR.CoteJ. A.BaumgartnerH. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23, 519–529. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
19.
HagborgW. J. (1991). The revised children’s manifest anxiety scale and social desirability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 423–427. doi:10.1177/0013164491512016
20.
HaytonJ. C.AllenD. G.ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675
21.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
LeeH.-S.FloresL. Y.NavarroR.SuhH. (2015, 8). Initial scale development of negative outcome expectation for engineering students. Toronto, Canada: Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.
23.
LentR. W.BrownS. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 12–35. doi: 10.1177/106907270528136
24.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.BrennerB.ChopraS. B.DavisT.TalleyrandR.SuthakaranV. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cogntive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 474–483. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.48.4.474
25.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
26.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.47.1.36
27.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.SchmidtJ.BrennerB.LyonsH.TreistmanD. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 458–465. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458
28.
LentR. W.LopezA. M.LopezF. G.SheuH.-B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002
29.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
30.
MarshH. W.DowsonM.PietschJ.WalkerR. (2004). Why multicollinearity matters: A reexamination of relations between self-efficacy, self-concept, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 518–522. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.518
31.
MallinckrodtB.AbrahamW. T.WeiM.RussellD. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
34.
Nassar-McMillanS. C.WyerM.Oliver-HoyoM.SchneiderJ. (2011). New tools for examining undergraduate students’ STEM stereotypes: Implications for women and other underrepresented groups. New Directions for Institutional Research, 152, 87–98. doi:10.1002/ir.411
35.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Highlights from the TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context(NCES Publication 2013-009). Retrieved fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013009rev.pdf
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in mathematics, science, and reading literacy in an international context: First look at PISA 2012(NCES Publication No. 2014-024). Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014024rev.pdf
37.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006, 5). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttp://quantpsy.org/
38.
ReynoldsC. R.RichmondB. O. (1979). Factor structure and construct validity of “What I think and feel:’ The revised children’s manifest anxiety scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 281–283.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1–10. doi:10.1037/a0018082
41.
SmithP. L.FouadN. A. (1999). Subject-matter specificity of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, interests, and goals: Implications for the social-cognitive model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 461–471. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.46.4.461
42.
WilliamsG. C.DeciE. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
43.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. doi: 10.1177/0011000006288127
44.
WyerM.SchneiderJ.Nassar-McMillanS.Oliver-HoyoM. (2010). Capturing stereotypes: Developing a scale to explore U.S. college students’ images of science and scientists. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 2, 381–415.
