Crossover refers to the interpersonal process that occurs when stress or strain experienced by one person affects the level of strain of another person in the same social environment. This study examined the moderating role of empathy (empathic concern and perspective taking) in the relationship between one partner’s work–family interface (work–family conflict [WFC] and work–family enrichment [WFE]) and the other partner’s outcome variables (psychological strain and marital satisfaction) in a sample of 361 Chinese dual-earner couples. Moderated actor-partner interdependence model analyses showed that wives’ perspective taking buffered the impact of husbands’ WFC on wives’ psychological strain, as well as strengthened the relationship between husbands’ WFE and wives’ marital satisfaction. Wives’ empathic concern reinforced the relationship between husbands’ WFE and wives’ marital satisfaction. The findings add to the literature by providing insight into the mechanisms responsible for the direct crossover of work–family experiences.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AllenT. D.HerstD. E. L.BruckC. S.SuttonM. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for further research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308. doi:10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.278
3.
BakkerA. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26–44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
4.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples: A closer look at the role of empathy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 220–236. doi:10.1108/02683940910939313
5.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2013). The spillover-crossover model. In GrzywaczJ. G.DemeroutiE. (Eds.), New frontiers in work and family research (pp.54–69). Hove Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
6.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.BurkeR. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 23–33. doi:10.1037/a0013290
7.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.DollardM. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 901–911. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.901
8.
BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B. (2000). Burnout contagion processes among teachers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2289–2308. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02437.x
9.
BakkerA. B.ShimazuA.DemeroutiE.ShimadaK.KawakamiN. (2011). Crossover of work engagement among Japanese couples: Perspective taking by both partners. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 112–125. doi:10.1037/a0021297
10.
BakkerA. B.XanthopoulouD. (2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1562–1571. doi:10.1037/a0017525
11.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
12.
BarnettR. C.HydeJ. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781–796. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.781
13.
BolgerN.DeLongisA.KesslerR.WethingtonE. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 175–183. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808
14.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2 Methodology (pp. 349–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
CampbellL.KashyD. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROCMIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327–342. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00023
16.
CarlsonD. S.FergusonM.KacmarK. M.GrzywaczJ. G.WhittenD. (2011). Pay it forward: The positive crossover effects of supervisor work–family enrichment. Journal of Management, 37, 770–789. doi:10.1177/0149206310363613
17.
CasperW.EbyL.BordeauxC.LockwoodA.LambertD. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.28
18.
ChangA.McDonaldP.BurtonP. (2010). Methodological choices in work-life balance research 1987 to 2006: A critical review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2381–2413. doi:10.1080/09585192.2010.516592
19.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109. doi:10.1080/01650250444000405
20.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
21.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
22.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 266–289. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.07.001
23.
FowersB. J.OlsonD. H. (1993). Enrich marital satisfaction scale: A brief research and clinical tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 176–185. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176
24.
FroneM. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In QuickJ. C.TetrickL. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
GoldbergD. P.WilliamsP. (1988). A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
26.
GreenhausJ. H.BeutellN. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88. doi:10.2307/258214
27.
GreenhausJ. H.PowellG. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625
28.
GrzywaczJ. G.MarksN. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126. doi:10.1037111076-8998.5.1.111
29.
HammerL. B.BauerT. N.GrandeyA. (2003). Work-family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 419–436. doi:10.1023/A:1022820609967
30.
HammerL. B.CullenJ. C.NealM. B.SinclairR. R.ShafiroM. V. (2005). The longitudinal effects of work-family conflict and positive spillover on depressive symptoms among dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 138–154. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.138
31.
HeinesV. Y.MarchhandA.HarveyS. (2006). Crossover of workplace aggression experiences in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 305–314. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.305
32.
HoM. Y.ChenX. F.CheungF. M.LiuH. M.WorthingtonE. L. (2013). A dyadic model of the work–family interface: A study of dual-earner couples in China. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 53–63. doi:10.1037/a0030885
33.
HoweG. W.LevyM. L.CaplanR. D. (2004). Job loss and depressive symptoms in couples: Common stressors, stress transmission, or relationship disruption?Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 639–650. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.639
34.
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (1999). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
KossekE. E.BaltesB. B.MatthewsR. A. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 352–369. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x
37.
LingY.PowellG. N. (2001). Work-family conflict in cotemporary China: Beyond an American-based model. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1, 357–373. doi:10.1177/147059580113006
38.
MatthewsR. A.Del PrioreR. E.AcitelliL. K.Barnes-FarrellJ. L. (2006). Work-to-relationship conflict: Crossover effects in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 228–240. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.228
39.
McNallL. A.NicklinJ. M.MasudaA. D. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work-family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 381–396. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9141-1
40.
ParasuramanS.GreenhausJ. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work-family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299–312. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00062-1
41.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
42.
PowellG. N.FrancescoA. M.LingY. (2009). Toward culture-sensitive theories of the work-family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 597–616. doi:10.1002/job.568
43.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
44.
RayensM. K.SvavardottirE. K. (2003). A new methodological approach in nursing research: An actor, partner, and interaction effect model for family outcomes. Research in Nursing and Health, 26, 409–419. doi:10.1002/nur.10100
45.
ShimazuA.BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2009). How job demands affect an intimate partner: A test of the spillover-crossover model in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health, 51, 239–248. doi:10.1539/joh.L8160
46.
TangS. W.SiuO. L.CheungF. (2014). A study of work-family enrichment among Chinese employees: The mediating role between work support and job satisfaction. Applies Psychology: An International Review, 63, 130–150. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00519.x
47.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48.
WestmanM. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54, 557–591. doi:10.1177/0018726701546002
49.
WestmanM.EtzionD.DanonE. (2001). Job insecurity and crossover of burnout in married couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 467–481. doi:10.1002/job.91
50.
WestmanM.EtzionD.HorovitzS. (2004). The toll of unemployment does not stop with the unemployed. Human Relations, 75, 823–844. doi:10.1177/0018726704045767
51.
WestmanM.VinokurA. (1998). Unraveling the relationship of distress levels within couples: Common stressors, emphatic reactions, or crossover via social interactions?Human Relations, 51, 137–156. doi:10.1177/001872679805100202
52.
WestmanM.VinokurA.HamiltonL.RozinerI. (2004). Crossover of marital dissatisfaction during downsizing: A study of Russian Army officers and their spouses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 759–779. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.769
