Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This research develops and provides initial evidence of internal validity for a measure of scientist and practitioner orientations in industrial/organizational psychology (the SPI-IO). The application of this measure has various potential benefits, including the ability to measure students' needs, guide their development, and understand the influence of training on their career interests over time. We used the O*Net database to draw information regarding what critical work tasks are performed by industrial/organizational (I/O) psychologists --these work tasks were used to build items for the practitioner scale of the SPI-IO. Leong and Zachar developed a scientist scale for an earlier version of the SPI used to assess career orientations in counseling and clinical psychology. The scientist scale is composed of items that are also relevant for I/O psychology. Together, Leong and Zachar's scientist scale and our newly developed practitioner scale comprise the SPI-IO. In Study 1, we used the SPI-IO to measure career orientations in undergraduates and found support for the measure's construct validity. In Study 2, we assessed career orientations in I/O psychology graduate students. With the graduate sample, we sought to again support the SPI-IO's validity and also to determine whether the SPI-IO could account for more variance in career specialty choice (i.e., science vs. practice) than more general measures of career interests (i.e., RIASEC). In all cases, the validity and unique predictive utility of the SPI-IO was confirmed. In addition to reviewing these results in detail, we provide a copy of the SPI-IO and discuss its implications for use.

Keywords

career choice career interests specialty choice organizational psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

P. I.

Allison

Rounds

(2008). Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 287–299.

Baruch

Bell

M. P.

Gray

(2005). Generalist and specialist graduate business degrees: Tangible and intangible value. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 51–68.

Borges

N. J.

Gibson

D. D.

(2005). Personality patterns of physicians in person-oriented and technique-oriented specialties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 4–20.

Brice

T. S.

Waung

(2001). Is the science-practice gap shrinking? Some encouraging news from an analysis of SIOP programs. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 38, 29–37.

Campbell

J. P.

(1992, May). The latent structure of science and practice: A confirmatory test. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal, Canada.

Coan

R. W.

(1979). Psychologists: Personal and theoretical pathways. New York, NY: Irvington.

Ford

J. K.

MacCallum

R. C.

Tait

(1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291–314.

Gottfredson

G. D.

(1987). Employment setting, specialization, and patterns of accomplishment among psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 452–460.

Gottfredson

G. D.

Holland

J. L.

(1996). Dictionary of Holland occupational codes. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

10.

Hall

J. A.

Davis

M. H.

Connelly

(2000). Dispositional empathy in scientists and practitioner psychologists: Group differences and relationship to self-reported professional effectiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 37, 45–56.

11.

Hartung

P. J.

Borges

N. J.

Jones

B. J.

(2005). Using person matching to predict career specialty choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 102–117.

12.

Hergenhahn

B. R.

(1997). An introduction to the history of psychology. New York, NY: Brooks.

13.

Holland

J. L.

(1985). Vocational preference inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

14.

Holland

J. L.

(1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

15.

Horn

R. A.

McGowan

M. R.

Mitchell

D. R.

Mellott

R. N.

Lilly

Martinez

(2007). A pilot study examining the longer term stability of the scientist-practitioner model of training. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 830–841.

16.

Kahn

J. H.

Miller

S. A.

(2000). Measuring global perceptions of the research training environment using a short form of the RTES-R. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 103–119.

17.

Kimble

G. A.

(1984). Psychology’s two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833–839.

18.

Koppes

L. L.

(2006). Science and practice. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43, 15–17.

19.

Lance

C. E.

Butts

M. M.

Michels

L. C.

(2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria—What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220.

20.

Leong

F. T. L.

Hardin

E. E.

Gaylor

(2005). Career specialty choice: A combined research-intervention project. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 69–86.

21.

Leong

F. T. L.

Zachar

(1991). Development and validation of the scientist-practitioner inventory for psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 331–341.

22.

Leong

F. T. L.

Zachar

Conant

Tolliver

(2007). Career specialty preferences among psychology majors: Cognitive processing styles associated with scientist and practitioner interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 55, 328–338.

23.

Martin

W. E.

Jr Gavin

Baker

Bridgmon

(2007). Analysis of the effects of gender and doctoral program emphasis on scientist and practitioner interests. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 820–829.

24.

Meir

E. I.

Melamed

(2005). Occupational specialty congruence: New data and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 21–34.

25.

O*Net Online. (n.d.). Retrieved December 27, 2011, from http://online.onetcenter.org/link/summary/19-3032.00

26.

Savickas

M. L.

Taber

B. J.

Spokane

A. R.

(2002). Convergent and discriminant validity of five interest inventories. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 139–184.

27.

Super

D. E.

(1953). A theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8, 185–190.

28.

Swaney

K. B.

(1995). Technical manual: Revised unisex edition of the ACT interest inventory (UNIACT). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.

29.

Taber

B. J.

Hartung

P. J.

Borges

N. J.

(2011). Personality and values as predictors of medical specialty choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 202–209.

30.

Zachar

Leong

F. T. L.

(1992). A problem of personality: Scientist and practitioner differences in psychology. Journal of Personality, 60, 665–677.

31.

Zachar

Leong

F. T. L.

(1997). General versus specific predictors of specialty choice in psychology: Holland codes and theoretical orientations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 333–341.

32.

Zachar

Leong

F. T. L.

(2000). A 10-year longitudinal study of scientist and practitioner interests in psychology: Assessing the Boulder model. Professional Psychology, 31, 575–580.

33.

Zickar

M. J.

Gibby

R. E.

(2006). Four persistent themes throughout the history of I-O psychology in the United States. In Koppes

L. L.

(Ed.), Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology (pp.61–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Assessing Scientist and Practitioner Orientations in Industrial/Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References