This study compared two interventions to increase math self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Ninety-nine first-year undergraduate students participated in an intervention involving performance accomplishment or an intervention combining performance accomplishment and belief-perseverance techniques in which participants constructed a rationale for their future success in math/science university courses. As hypothesized, participants in the combined intervention immediately demonstrated higher math self-efficacy than did the Performance-Accomplishment only group; data convey that this effect was sustained at a 6-week follow-up. No differences were found between the groups in interest in technical careers, confidence in successfully completing math/ science courses, and willingness to enroll in math/science courses. Data analyses by gender indicated that male participants but not female participants in the combined intervention immediately demonstrated higher math self-efficacy than their counterparts. Findings suggest that self-persuasion activities may make an important contribution to enhancing math self-efficacy at least for men. Implications for women and future research are discussed.
Anderson, C.A., Lepper, M.R., & Ross, L. ( 1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role ofexplanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
2.
Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman/ Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
4.
Betz, N.E., & Hackett, G. ( 1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410.
5.
Betz, N.E., & Hackett, G. ( 1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 329-345.
6.
Betz, N.E., & Hackett, G. ( 1993). Mathematics self-efficacy scale test booklet. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
7.
Byars-Winston, A.M., & Fouad, N.A. ( 2008). Math and science social cognitive variables in college students: Contributions of contextual factors in predicting goals. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 425-440.
8.
Campbell, N.K., & Hackett, G. ( 1986). The effects of mathematics task performance on math self-efficacy and task interest. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 28, 149-162.
9.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. ( 2007) Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future (free executive summary). Retrieved May 16, 2009, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html
10.
Cooper, S.E., & Robinson, D.A.G. (1991). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs to mathematics anxiety and performance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24, 4-11.
11.
Ferry, T.R., Fouad, N.A., & Smith, P.L. ( 2000). The role of familial context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 348-364.
12.
Gainor, K.A. ( 2006). Twenty-five years of self-efficacy in career assessment and practice. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 161-178.
13.
Gore, P.A. ( 1996, August). A structural analysis of social cognitive theory . Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
14.
Gore, P.A., & Leuwerke, W.C. (2000). Predicting occupational considerations: A comparison of self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and person-environment congruence. Journal of Career Assessment , 8, 237-250.
15.
Guenther, C.L., & Alicke, M.D. ( 2008). Self-enhancement and belief perseverance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 706-712.
16.
Gwilliam, L.R., & Betz, N.E. ( 2001). Validity of measures of math- and science-related self-efficacy for African Americans andEuropean Americans. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 261-281.
17.
Hackett, G., Betz, N.E., O’Halloran, M.S., & Romac, D.S. ( 1990). Effects of verbal and mathematics task performance on task and career self-efficacy and interest. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 169-177.
18.
Hirt, E.R., & Markman, K.D. ( 1995). Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1069-1086.
19.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S.B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakaran, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 474-483.
20.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., Gover, M.R., & Nijer, S.K. ( 1996). Cognitive assessment of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy: A thought-listing analysis. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 33-46.
21.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. ( 1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
22.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. ( 1996). Career development from a social cognitive perspective . In D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 373-421). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Larkin, K.C. ( 1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356-362.
24.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Larkin, K.C. ( 1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 33, 165-169.
25.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. ( 2002). Testing social cognitive interest and choice hypotheses across Holland types in Italian high school students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 101-118.
26.
Lindley, L.D. ( 2006). The paradox of self-efficacy: Research with diverse populations . Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 143-160.
27.
Luzzo, D.A., Hasper, P., Albert, K.A., Bibby, M.A., & Martinelli, E.A. Jr. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the math/science self-efficacy and careerinterests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of CounselingPsychology, 46, 233-243.
28.
McFarland, C., Cheam, A., & Buehler, R. ( 2007). The perseverance effect in the debriefing paradigm: Replication and extension. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 233-240.
29.
National Science Foundation. (2008). Science and engineering indicators: 2008 (NSB 08-01). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/c2/c2h.htm
30.
Ross, L., Lepper, M.R., & Hubbard, M. ( 1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880-892.
31.
Rottinghaus, P.J., Larson, L.M., & Borgen, F.H. ( 2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 221-236.
32.
Thorndike, R.L., Hagen, E.P., & Sattler, J.M. ( 1986a). Guide for administering and scoring the fourth edition: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., Abrahams, D., & Aronson, V. ( 1967). Effectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 371-380.
35.
Zeldin, A.L., Britner, S.L., & Pajares, F. ( 2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1036-1058.
