Between 1980 and 1993, only 19% of medical school graduates chose faculty appointments with research responsibilities. Women and minorities represent only a small fraction of these, despite their growing numbers. The authors' goal is to study the effects of human agency, particularly self-efficacy, on the career development of physician researchers, especially women and people of color; therefore, we developed a reliable and valid inventory for assessing clinical research self-efficacy in a population of physicians training for clinical research careers. Scale items were pooled from expert knowledge, relevant literature, and existing inventories to create a 92-item Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory that was factor analyzed and refined to include 88 items. Although instruments have been developed to successfully assess research self-efficacy, this is the first instrument designed to assess self-efficacy in the clinical research domain using a population of academic physicians.
Association of American Medical Colleges. ( 2002). Information technology enabling clinical research. Findings and recommendations from a conference sponsored by the Association of American Medical Colleges with funding from the National Science Foundation. Retrieved August 30, 2005, from http://www.aamc.org/members/gir/clincalresearchreport.pdf
2.
Association of American Medical Colleges. ( 2005a). Minorities in medical education: Fact & figures 2005. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.aamc.org/publications/
3.
Association of American Medical Colleges. ( 2005b). Women in U.S. academic medicine: Statistics and medical school benchmarking 2004—2005. Retrieved November 17, 2005, from http://www.aamc.org/members/wim/statistics/stats04/start.htm
4.
Bakken, L.L., Lichtenstein, M., & the Association of Clinical Research Training Program Directors Evaluation and Accreditation Committee. ( 2005). A survey of the impact of National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinical research curriculum awards (K30) between 1999 and 2004. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 53, 123—127.
5.
Bakken, L.L., Sheridan, J., & Carnes, M. (2003). Gender differences among physician-scientists in self-assessed abilities to perform clinical research. Academic Medicine, 78, 1281—1286.
6.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307—338). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
9.
Bieschke, K.J. (2006). Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: Implications for developing scientifically-minded psychologists . Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 77—91.
10.
Bieschke, K.J., Bishop, R.M., & Garcia, V.L. (1993, August). A factor analysis of the research self-efficacy scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of theAmerican Psychological Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.
11.
Bishop, R.M., & Bieschke, K.J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 182—188.
12.
Bland, C., Schmitz, C., Stritter, F., Henry, R., & Aluise, J. (1990). Successful faculty in academic medicine: Essential skills and how to acquire them. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
13.
Bonetta, L. (Ed.). (2004). Making the right moves: A practical guide to scientific management for post-docs and new faculty. Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
14.
Brown, S., Lent, R., Ryan, N., & McPartland, E. (1996). Self-efficacy as an intervening mechanism between research training environments and scholarly productivity: A theoretical and methodological extension. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 535—544.
15.
Dunn, C.M., & Chadwick, G.L. (2004). Protecting study volunteers in research: A manual for investigative sites (3rd ed.). Boston: CenterWatch, Inc.
16.
Fang, D. (2004, June). An analysis of the relationship between medical students' educational indebtedness and their careers in research. Analysis in Brief, 4. Retrieved February 3, 2006, from http://www.aamc.org/data/aib/
17.
Forester, M., Kahn, J.H., & Hesson-McInnis, M.S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 3—16.
18.
Frans, D.J. (1993). A scale for measuring social worker empowerment . Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 312—328.
19.
Gelso, C.J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and practice, 24, 468—476.
20.
Gelso, C.J., Mallinckrodt, B., & Judge, A.B. (1996). Research training environment, attitudes toward research, and research self-efficacy: The revised Research Training Environment Scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 304—322.
21.
Greeley, A., Johnson, E., Seem, S., Braver, M., Dias, L., Evans, K., et al. (1989). Research self-efficacy scale. Scale presented at the conference of the Association for Women in Psychology , Bethesda, MD.
22.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Meenaghan, T., & Rosenberg, G. (1999). Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education , 35(3), 463—476.
23.
Kahn, J.H. (2001). Predicting the scholarly activity of counseling psychology students: A refinement and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 344—354.
24.
Kahn, J.H., & Miller, S.A. (2000). Measuring global perceptions of the research training environment using a short form of the RTES-R. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 103—199.
25.
Korenman, S.G., & Shipp, A.C. (1994). Teaching responsible conduct of research through a case study approach: A handbook for instructors. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
26.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79—122.
27.
Nathan, D.G. (1998) Clinical research: Perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 280(16), 1427—31.
28.
National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). Roadmap initiative to provide training for future leaders of clinical research: The multidisciplinary clinical research career development program. Retrieved July 5, 2006, from http://www.nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/clinicaltraining/futureleaders.asp
29.
O'Brien, K.M., Malone, M.E., Schmidt, C.K., & Lucas, M.S. (1998, August). Research self-efficacy: Improvements in instrumentation. Poster session presented at the annual conference of theAmerican Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
30.
O'Hare, T., & Collins, P. (1997). Development and validation of a scale for measuring social work practice skills. Research on Social Work Practice , 7, 228—238.
31.
Phillips, J., & Russell, R. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22(4), 628—641.
32.
Richardson, D., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2002, November). Attitudes toward research of African-American graduate students as a function of locality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chattanooga, TN.
33.
Royalty, G., & Reising, G. (1986). The research training of counseling psychologists: What the professionals say. The Counseling Psychologist, 14(1), 49—60.
34.
Walsh, W.B., & Betz, N.E. (2001). Tests and assessment (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.
Wolf, M. (2002). Clinical research career development: The individual perspective. Academic Medicine, 77, 1084—1088.
