The structure of occupational values is investigated using several analytical techniques. Data from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Information Network (O*NET) describing need reinforcers for 900 occupations are examined using exploratory factor analysis, cluster analysis, and multidimensional scaling. Results indicated broadly defined values that primarily reflected elements of work-place identity and workplace structure.
Borgen, F. H., Weiss, D. J., Tinsley, H. E. A., Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1968). Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation, XXV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
2.
Dawis, R. V. (1991). Vocational interests, values, and preferences. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 833-872). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
3.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Gay, E. G., Weiss, D. J., Hendel, D. D., Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1971). Manual for the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: Work Adjustment Project.
5.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6.
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1995). Iterative projection strategies for the least-squares fitting of tree structures to proximity data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48(2), 281-317.
7.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
8.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115-129.
9.
McCloy, R., Waugh, G., Medsker, G., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. (1999a). Determining the occupational reinforcer patterns for occupational units. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development.
10.
McCloy, R., Waugh, G., Medsker, G., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. (1999b). Development of the O*NET Computerized Work Importance Profiler. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development.
11.
McCloy, R., Waugh, G., Medsker, G., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. (1999c). Development of the O*NET Paper-and-Pencil Work Importance Locator. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development.
12.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
13.
Rounds, J. B. (1981). The comparative and combined utility of need and interest data in the prediction of job satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
14.
Rounds, J. B., Henly, G. A., Dawis, R. V., Lofquist, L. H., & Weiss, D. J. (1981). Manual for the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire: A measure of needs and values. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Department of Psychology.
15.
Sager, C. E. (1999). Occupational interests and values. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, et al. (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of the O*NET (pp. 197-211). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Shepard, R. N. (1962a). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function—I. Psychometrika, 27, 125-140.
17.
Shepard, R. N. (1962b). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function—II. Psychometrika, 27, 219-246.
18.
Super, D. E. (1973). The Work Values Inventory. In D. G. Zytowski (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to interest measurement (pp. 189-205). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2000). Work importance locator: User’s guide. Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://www.onetcenter.org/WIL.html
20.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2002). Work importance profiler: User’s guide. Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://www.onetcenter.org/WIP.html%23software
21.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2004). O*NET 6.0 data dictionary. Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://www.onetcenter.org/dev_db.html
