The authors examined how college men’s conformity to an array of masculinity norms varied as a function of their vocational interests to better understand the gendered context of men’s vocational development. Three hundred ten mostly Caucasian and heterosexual college men completed the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory, and their answer to the question “What is your ideal job/career after college?” was classified into one of six high point codes reflecting Holland’s RIASEC interests using the Dictionary of Holland Occupational Titles (1996). Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that college men’s conformity to masculinity norms varied as a function of their vocational interests, and univariate analyses indicated that this was true for 9 of the 11 masculinity norms examined. The discussion addresses the implications of a multidimensional conceptualization of masculinity in understanding men’s vocational development.
Betz, N. E. (1995). Gender-related individual differences variables: New concepts, methods, and findings. In D. J. Lubinski & R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 119-143). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
2.
Betz, N. E., Heesacker, R. S., & Shuttleworth, C. (1990). Moderators of the congruence and realism of major occupational plans in college students: A replication and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 269-276.
3.
Brown, L. S. (1986). Gender role analysis: A neglected component of psychological assessment. Psychotherapy, 23, 243-248.
4.
Chusmir, L. H. (1990). Men who make nontraditional career choices. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 11-16.
5.
David, D. S., & Brannon, R. (1976). The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Cherpas, C. C. (1985). On the reciprocal relationship between gender and occupation: Rethinking the assumptions concerning masculine career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 109-122.
7.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Fassinger, R. E., & Betz, N. E. (1995). Theoretical advances in the study of women’s career development. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 67-109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Gati, I., & Winer, D. (1987). The relationship between vocational interests and the location of an ideal occupation in the individual’s perceived occupational structure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 295-308.
9.
Gianakos, I., & Subich, L. M. (1988). Student sex and sex role in relation to college major choice. Career Development Quarterly, 36, 259-268.
10.
Good, G. E., Gilbert, L. A., & Scher, M. (1990). Gender aware therapy: A synthesis of feminist therapy and knowledge about gender. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 376-380.
11.
Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland occupational titles (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12.
Gottfredson, L. (1981). Circumscription and compromise. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545-579.
13.
Gottfredson, L. (1996). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 179-232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Hannah, J. S., & Kahn, S. E. (1989). The relationship of socioeconomic status and gender to the occupational choices of grade 12 students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 161-178.
15.
Harren, V. A., Kass, R. A., Tinsley, H. E., & Moreland, J. R. (1979). Influence of gender, sex-role attitudes, and cognitive complexity on gender-dominant career choices. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26, 227-234.
16.
Hayes, R. (1986). Men’s decisions to enter or avoid nontraditional occupations. Career Development Quarterly, 35, 89-101.
17.
Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35-45.
18.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19.
Jome, L. M., & Tokar, D. M. (1998). Dimensions of masculinity and major choice traditionality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 120-134.
20.
Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.
21.
Lazur, R. F., & Majors, R. (1995). Men of color: Ethnocultural variations of male gender role strain. In R.F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 337-358). New York: Basic Books.
22.
Lemkau, J. P. (1984). Men in female-dominated professions: Distinguishing personality and background features. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 24, 110-122.
23.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
24.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1996). Career development from a social cognitive perspective. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 373-421). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Leung, S. A., & Harmon, L. W. (1990). Individual and sex differences in the zone of acceptable alternatives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 153-159.
26.
Leung, S. A., & Plake, B. S. (1990). A choice dilemma approach for examining the relative importance of sex type and prestige preferences in the process of career choice compromise. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 399-406.
27.
Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.
28.
Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009.
29.
Mahalik, J. R. (1999). Incorporating a gender role strain perspective in assessing and treating men’s cognitive distortions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 333-340.
30.
Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B., Ludlow, L., Diemer, M., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3-25.
31.
Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147-163.
34.
Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculine ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 129-163). New York: Basic Books.
35.
Tokar, D. M., & Jome, L. M. (1998). Masculinity, vocational interests, and career choice traditionality: Evidence for a fully mediated model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 424-435.
36.
Tyler, L. E. (1978). Individuality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Weinrach, S. G. (1996). The psychological and vocational interest patterns of Donald Super and John Holland. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75, 5-16.
38.
Wertheim, E. G., Widom, C. S., & Wortzel, L. H. (1978). Multivariate analysis of male and female professional career choice correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 234-242.
