This study tests the viability of using Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences as a structure for identifying knowledge diversity in business students and whether such knowledge increases identification of self and others as potential sources of knowledge. The results from business students with substantial work histories indicate that the Multiple Intelligence Preference Inventory gives a valid and reliable indication of their preferred intelligences and that knowledge of these results is associated with assessments of self as sources of knowledge for others and, conversely, identification of others as potential sources of knowledge. Despite the limitations of a small and interrupted sample and the need for continued refinement to items, the results are supportive of further investigations into the use of the inventory and knowledge of multiple intelligence theory not only as part of a knowledge identification and sharing program for students but also as a tool for recognizing, respecting, and benefiting from such diversity in the workplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J. R. (1997). A cognitive framework for understanding demographic influences in groups. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5(4), 342-359.
2.
Bardaracco, J. L. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
3.
Bartunek, J. M. (1993). Micropolitics of knowledge: Communication and indirect control. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 749-750.
4.
Beckman, D., & Hirsch, D. (1999). Let's work together. Communications News, 36(8), 22-23.
5.
Behling, O. (1998). Employee selection: Will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job? Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 77-86.
6.
Birchall, D. W., & Tovstiga, G. (1999). The strategic potential of a firm's knowledge portfolio. Journal of General Management, 25(1), 1-16.
7.
Boland, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V., & Te'eni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science, 5(3), 456-475.
Carsten, K., De Dreu, W., & West, A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
10.
Checkley, K. (1997). The first seven... and the eighth. A conversation with Howard Gardner. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 8-13.
11.
Choo, C. W. (1999). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Cross, R., & Baird, L. (2000). Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 69-78.
13.
Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creating and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100-120.
14.
Cross, R. L., & Brodt, S. E. (2001). How assumptions of consensus undermine decision making. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 86-94.
15.
Darling, M. S. (1996). Building the knowledge organization. Business Quarterly, 61(2), 61-66.
16.
Dass, P., & Parker, B. (1999). Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 68-80.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19.
Dixon, N. (2002). The neglected receiver of knowledge sharing. Ivey Business Journal, 66(4), 35-39.
20.
Fernandez, J. P., & Barr, M. (1993). The diversity advantage: How American business can out-perform Japanese and European companies in the global marketplace. New York: Lexington.
21.
Fluss, D. (2002). Why knowledge management is a “dirty” word. Northern Lights Special Collection, 15(2), 40-41.
22.
Foley, A. J. (2000). Human resources; Right match of worker, job yields dividends. American Banker, 165(108), 17a.
23.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind, the theory of multiple intelligences (19th anniversary ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Gottschalk, P. (1999). Predictors of IT support for knowledge management in the professions: An empirical study of law firms in Norway. Journal of Information Technology, 15(1), 69-78.
28.
Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, K. (2000). Knowledge management's social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 77-80.
29.
Halal, W. E. (1997). Organizational intelligence: What is it, and how can managers use it? Strategy & Business, fourth quarter.
30.
Han, F. (2001). Understanding knowledge management. Public Manager, 30(2), 34-35.
31.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
32.
Jehn, K. A. (2000). Benefits and detriments of workplace conflict. Public Manager, 29(2), 24-26.
33.
Jehn, K. A., Gregory, B., Northcraft, M. A., & Neale, A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
34.
Joplin, J. R. W., & Daus, C. S. (1997). Challenges of leading a diverse workforce. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 32-47.
Lakey, L. K. (1996). Toward a theory of communicative interactions in culturally diverse workgroups. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 463-491.
Leeman, R. (2001). People networking—Sharing knowledge, facilitating improvement and stimulating creativity. British Journal of Administrative Management, 28, 24-25.
39.
Lesser, E., & Everest, K. (2001). Using communities of practice to manage intellectual capital. Ivey Business Journal, 65(4), 37-41.
40.
Malhorta, Y. (2000). Knowledge management and new organization forms: A framework for business model innovation. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(1), 5-14.
41.
Martin, J. (2000). Profiting from multiple intelligences in the workplace. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
42.
Martin, J. (2002). Multiple intelligences, a trainer's resource of 35 activities. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
43.
Maznevski, M. L. (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations, 47(5), 531-547.
44.
McBain, R. (1999). Managing human, social and intellectual capital for competitive advantage. Manager Update, 10(4), 21-33.
45.
McBain, R. (2001a). Human resources management: Culture, commitment and the role of the HR function. Manager Update, 13(2), 22-33.
46.
McBain, R. (2001b). Human resources management: Performance and power. Manager Update, 12(4), 21-32.
47.
McCampbell, A. S., Moorehead, C. L., & Gitters, S. H. (1999). Knowledge management: The new challenge for the 21st century. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(3), 172-180.
48.
McMahan, G. C., Bell, M. P., & Virick, M. (1998). Strategic human resource management: Employee involvement, diversity, and international issues. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3), 193-214.
49.
Mirabile, R. J. (1999). The new workplace. Human Resources Professional, 12(6), 19-22.
50.
Nakra, P. (2000). Knowledge management the magic is in the culture! Competitive Intelligence Review, 11(2), 53-60.
51.
Neale, M. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Jehn, K. A. (1999). Exploring Pandora's box: The impact of diversity and conflict on work group performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12(1), 113-126.
52.
Nemetz, P. L., & Christensen, S. L. (1996). The challenge of cultural diversity: Harnessing a diversity of views to understand multiculturalism. Academy of Management, 21(2), 432-462.
53.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
Nordhaug, O. (1994). Human capital in organizations: Competence, training and learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Norris, D. M. (1997). Generating value through knowledge sharing. Association Management, 49(6), 26-33.
56.
Ofori-Dankwa, J. C., & Scott, D. J. (2002). Toward diversity and similarity curves: Implications for theory, research and practice. Human Relations, 55(2), 199-224.
57.
O'Reilly, C. A. (1983). The use of information in organizational decision-making: A model and competing propositions. Association Management, 49(6), 26-33.
58.
Patel, D. (2002). Managing talent. HR Magazine, 47(3), 112.
59.
Peters, T. (2000). Talent-based enterprise. Executive Excellence, 17(3), 3-5.
60.
Redding, J. C., & Catalanello, R. F. (1994). Strategic readiness: The making of the learning organization. New York: Jossey-Bass.
61.
Seely-Brown, J. (1996-1997). The human factor. Information Strategy, 16(9), 6-7.
62.
Shariq, S. (1999). How does knowledge transform as it is transferred? Speculations on the possibility of a cognitive theory of knowledgescapes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 243-252.
63.
Shores, E. F. (1995). Interview with Howard Gardner. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 23(4), 5-7.
64.
Strassmann, P. A. (1997). The squandered computer: Evaluating the business alignment of information technologies. New Canaan, CT: Information Economics Press.
65.
Terrisse, S. A. (2001). Does your organization's gene pool need to make a bigger splash? Workplace diversity and its impact on creativity. Public Relations Quarterly, 46(1), 30.
66.
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructivist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11-25.
67.
Weller, L. D. (1999). Application of the multiple intelligence theory in quality organizations. Team Performance Management, 5(4), 136-145.
68.
Wiig, K. M. (1995). Knowledge management methods: practical approaches to managing knowledge. Arlington, TX: Schema.
