Trust is a fundamental basis of business relationships, especially between salespeople and their organizational buyers. However, trust can be damaged in various ways. Previous studies have suggested several repair strategies to recover trust, such as offering apologies or economic compensation. While valuable, the effectiveness of these strategies can be context dependent. This research draws on social exchange theory and the guanxi literature to introduce the notion of renqing repair strategy. Across four experimental studies conducted with multiple samples in China and the United States, this research finds robust evidence that renqing repair effectively mitigates trust damage in both Eastern and Western cultures. More importantly, it provides evidence that renqing repair is especially effective in addressing trust breaches that occur in newly established relationships or when the trust-damaging action is intentional. Evidence also shows that, in addition to the established mechanism of relational fairness, trust recovery can be driven by feelings of indebtedness between the buyer and salesperson. This research contributes to the literature by expanding the understanding of an alternative trust repair strategy and offering actionable insights for managing trust breaches in business relationships.
BarbaletJ. (2018), “Guanxi as Social Exchange: Emotions, Power and Corruption,” Sociology, 52 (5), 934–49.
2.
BarnesB.R.LeonidouL.C.SiuN.Y.LeonidouC.N. (2010), “Opportunism as the Inhibiting Trigger for Developing Long-Term-Oriented Western Exporter–Hong Kong Importer Relationships,” Journal of International Marketing, 18 (2), 35–63.
3.
BauerC.LeungF.PalmatierR.W. (2024), “Effects of Gifting on Relationship Performance: Strategies for Avoiding Suspicion and Unfairness Perceptions,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52, 1713–40.
4.
BlauP.M. (1964), “Justice in Social Exchange,” Sociological Inquiry, 34 (2), 193–206.
5.
BolanderW.ZahnW.J.LoeT.W.ClarkM. (2017), “Managing New Salespeople’s Ethical Behaviors During Repetitive Failures: When Trying to Help Actually Hurts,” Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 519–32.
6.
BrownJ.R.DevC.S.LeeD.J. (2000), “Managing Marketing Channel Opportunism: The Efficacy of Alternative Governance Mechanisms,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (2), 51–65.
7.
ChakerN.N.HabelJ.HewettK.ZablahA.R. (2024), “The Future of Research on International Selling and Sales Management,” Journal of International Marketing, 32 (1), 1–14.
8.
ChenC.C.ChenX.P.HuangS. (2013), “Chinese Guanxi: An Integrative Review and New Directions for Future Research,” Management and Organization Review, 9 (1), 167–207.
9.
ChuZ.LaiF.WangL. (2020), “Leveraging Interfirm Relationships in China: Western Relational Governance or Guanxi? Domestic Versus Foreign Firms,” Journal of International Marketing, 28 (4), 58–74.
10.
ColquittJ.A.ScottB.A.LePineJ.A. (2007), “Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (4), 909–27.
11.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM.S. (2005), “Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review,” Journal of Management, 31 (6), 874–900.
De CremerD. (2010), “To Pay or to Apologize? On the Psychology of Dealing with Unfair Offers in a Dictator Game,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (6), 843–48.
14.
DelbufaloE. (2021), “Asset Specificity and Relationship Performance: A Meta-Analysis Over Three Decades,” Journal of Business Research, 134, 105–21.
15.
DesmetP.T.De CremerD.van DijkE. (2011), “In Money We Trust? The Use of Financial Compensations to Repair Trust in the Aftermath of Distributive Harm,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114 (2), 75–86.
16.
DimokaA. (2010), “What Does the Brain Tell Us About Trust and Distrust? Evidence from a Functional Neuroimaging Study,” MIS Quarterly, 34 (2), 373–96.
17.
DirksK.T.KimP.H.FerrinD.L.CooperC.D. (2011), “Understanding the Effects of Substantive Responses on Trust Following a Transgression,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114 (2), 87–103.
18.
DyerJ.H.SinghH. (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 660–79.
19.
EckerdS.HandleyS.LumineauF. (2022), “Trust Violations in Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Spillovers and the Contingent Role of Governance Structures,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58 (3), 47–70.
20.
FerrinD.L.KimP.H.CooperC.D.DirksK.T. (2007), “Silence Speaks Volumes: The Effectiveness of Reticence in Comparison to Apology and Denial for Responding to Integrity- and Competence-Based Trust Violations,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (4), 893–908.
21.
FoaU.G.FoaE.B. (1980), “Resource Theory: Interpersonal Behavior as Exchange,” in Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, GergenK.J.GreenbergM.S.WillisR.H., eds. Plenum.
22.
GouldnerA.W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,” American Sociological Review, 25 (2), 161–78.
23.
GreenbergM.S. (1980), “A Theory of Indebtedness,” in Social Exchange, GergenK.J.GreenbergM.S.WillisR.H., eds. Springer.
24.
GrégoireY.FisherR.J. (2008), “Customer Betrayal and Retaliation: When Your Best Customers Become Your Worst Enemies,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 247–61.
25.
GriffithD.A.ZhaoY. (2015), “Contract Specificity, Contract Violation, and Relationship Performance in International Buyer–Supplier Relationships,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (3), 22–40.
26.
GroverS.L.Abid-DupontM.A.ManvilleC.HaselM.C. (2019), “Repairing Broken Trust Between Leaders and Followers: How Violation Characteristics Temper Apologies,” Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 853–70.
27.
GustafsonB.M.PomirleanuN.MariadossB.J.JohnsonJ.L. (2021), “The Social Buyer: A Framework for the Dynamic Role of Social Media in Organizational Buying,” Journal of Business Research, 125, 806–14.
HayesA.F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
30.
HwangK.K. (1987), “Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game,” American Journal of Sociology, 92 (4), 944–74.
31.
JapS.D.GanesanS. (2000), “Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 227–45.
32.
KähkönenT.BlomqvistK.GillespieN.VanhalaM. (2021), “Employee Trust Repair: A Systematic Review of 20 Years of Empirical Research and Future Research Directions,” Journal of Business Research, 130, 98–109.
33.
KaufmannL.EsslingerJ.CarterC.R. (2018), “Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer-Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54 (4), 62–85.
34.
KimK.BakerM.A. (2020), “Paying It Forward: The Influence of Other Customer Service Recovery on Future Co-Creation,” Journal of Business Research, 121, 604–15.
35.
KimP.H.CooperC.D.DirksK.T.FerrinD.L. (2013), “Repairing Trust with Individuals vs. Groups,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120 (1), 1–14.
36.
KimP.H.DirksK.T.CooperC.D. (2009), “The Repair of Trust: A Dynamic Bilateral Perspective and Multilevel Conceptualization,” Academy of Management Review, 34 (3), 401–22.
37.
KimP.H.DirksK.T.CooperC.D.FerrinD.L. (2006), “When More Blame Is Better Than Less: The Implications of Internal vs. External Attributions for the Repair of Trust After a Competence- vs. Integrity-Based Trust Violation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99 (1), 49–65.
38.
KimP.H.FerrinD.L.CooperC.D.DirksK.T. (2004), “Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence- Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (1), 104–18.
39.
LiuY.H.S.DeligonulS.CavusgilE.ChiouJ.S. (2018), “Always Trust in Old Friends? Effects of Reciprocity in Bilateral Asset Specificity on Trust in International B2B Partnerships,” Journal of Business Research, 90, 171–85.
40.
LundD.J.KozlenkovaI.V.PalmatierR.W. (2015), “Good Versus Bad Relationship Framework,” in The Dark side of CRM, NguyenB.SimkinL.CanhotoA.I., eds. Routledge, 93–122.
41.
LuoX. (2002), “Trust Production and Privacy Concerns on the Internet: A Framework Based on Relationship Marketing and Social Exchange Theory,” Industrial Marketing Management, 31 (2), 111–18.
42.
LuoY. (1997), “Guanxi: Principles, Philosophies, and Implications,” Human Systems Management, 16, 43–52.
43.
LuoY. (2007), Guanxi and Business. World Scientific.
44.
LussierB.HallZ.R. (2018), “Cooperation in B2B Relationships: Factors That Influence Customers’ Perceptions of Salesperson Cooperation,” Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 209–20.
45.
MangusS.M.BockD.E.FolseJ.A.G.JonesE. (2022), “The Comparative Effects of Gratitude and Indebtedness in B2B Relationships,” Industrial Marketing Management, 103, 73–82.
46.
MirS.BlessleyM.ZachariaZ.AloysiusJ. (2022), “Mending Fences in a Buyer–Supplier Relationship: The Role of Justice in Relationship Restoration,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58 (3), 23–46.
47.
MolmL.D. (2003), “Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange,” Sociological Theory, 21 (1), 1–17.
48.
MorganR.M.HuntS.D. (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20–38.
49.
NelsonC.A.BrownJ.R. (2024), “Actions Speak Louder Than Words: The Adaptive Use of Behavioral Repair Strategies on Trust Recovery,” Industrial Marketing Management, 122, 89–105.
50.
NelsonC.A.CuiA.P.WalshM.F. (2021), “Breach of Trust and Repair: The Impact of Salespersons Words and Actions on Buyer Trust,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 24 (3), 375–95.
51.
NelsonC.A.WalshM.F.CuiA.P. (2024), “Trust Repair After a Sales Manager Error,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 44 (1), 74–83.
52.
PalmatierR.W.DantR.P.GrewalD.EvansK.R. (2006), “Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 136–53.
53.
PalmatierR.W.HoustonM.B.DantR.P.GrewalD. (2013), “Relationship Velocity: Toward a Theory of Relationship Dynamics,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 13–30.
54.
PalmatierR.W.JarvisC.B.BechkoffJ.R.KardesF.R. (2009), “The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 1–18.
55.
ParkS.H.LuoY. (2001), “Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics: Organizational Networking in Chinese Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5), 455–77.
56.
RenH.GrayB. (2009), “Repairing Relationship Conflict: How Violation Types and Culture Influence the Effectiveness of Restoration Rituals,” Academy of Management Review, 34 (1), 105–26.
57.
RindfleischA.HeideJ.B. (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (4), 30–54.
58.
RokkanA.I.HeideJ.B.WathneK.H. (2003), “Specific Investments in Marketing Relationships: Expropriation and Bonding Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (2), 210–24.
59.
SamahaS.A.PalmatierR.W.DantR.P. (2011), “Poisoning Relationships: Perceived Unfairness in Channels of Distribution,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (3), 99–117.
60.
SchoormanF.D.MayerR.C.DavisJ.H. (2007), “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 344–54.
61.
SchweitzerM.E.HersheyJ.C.BradlowE.T. (2006), “Promises and Lies: Restoring Violated Trust,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101 (1), 1–19.
62.
SharmaK.SchoormanF.D.BallingerG.A. (2023), “How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Research,” Journal of Management, 49 (1), 363–99.
63.
ShiG.ShiY.ChanA.K.LiuM.T.FamK.S. (2011), “The Role of Renqing in Mediating Customer Relationship Investment and Relationship Commitment in China,” Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (4), 496–502.
64.
SkarmeasD.ZeritiA.BaltasG. (2016), “Relationship Value: Drivers and Outcomes in International Marketing Channels,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (1), 22–40.
65.
TomlinsonE.C.MayerR.C. (2009), “The Role of Causal Attribution Dimensions in Trust Repair,” Academy of Management Review, 34 (1), 85–104.
66.
TomlinsonE.C.NelsonC.A.LanglinaisL.A. (2021), “A Cognitive Process Model of Trust Repair,” International Journal of Conflict Management, 32 (2), 340–60.
67.
VinogradovP.DatwaniH. (2021), “How B2B Firms Can Thrive in the Future of Sales,” Wall Street Journal CMO Today (October 18), https://deloitte.wsj.com/cmo/how-b2b-firms-can-thrive-in-the-future-of-sales-01634577325.
WangC.L.SiuN.Y.BarnesB.R. (2008), “The Significance of Trust and Renqing in the Long-Term Orientation of Chinese Business-to-Business Relationships,” Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (7), 819–24.
70.
WarrenD.E.DunfeeT.W.LiN. (2004), “Social Exchange in China: The Double-Edged Sword of Guanxi,” Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 353–70.
71.
WestjohnS.A.MagnussonP.FrankeG.R.PengY. (2022), “Trust Propensity Across Cultures: The Role of Collectivism,” Journal of International Marketing, 30 (1), 1–17.
72.
WuW.K. (2022), “How Customer Perception of Dependence on Salesperson and Customer–Salesperson Guanxi Determine Salesperson Influence Effectiveness,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 42 (1), 12–25.
73.
WynesM.J. (2022), “‘Just Say You’re Sorry’: Avoidance and Revenge Behavior in Response to Organizations Apologizing for Fraud,” Journal of Business Ethics, 178, 129–51.
74.
YangM. (1994), Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Cornell University Press.
75.
YenD.A.AbosagI.HuangY.A.NguyenB. (2017), “Guanxi GRX (Ganqing, Renqing, Xinren) and Conflict Management in Sino-US Business Relationships,” Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 103–14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
