Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-3
Untangling the Duality of Emerging Market Firms’ Response to Outward Foreign Direct Investment Policies on Their Innovation Performance: A Resource Dependence Perspective
Firms’ international expansion, affected by outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) policies of home countries, can greatly shape their innovation performance. Yet, existing literature lacks sufficient investigation toward the nexus between corporate response to policies in OFDI activities and subsequent innovation performance. Thus, this article examines how a firm's response to OFDI policies affects its innovation performance. Drawing on the resource dependence theory, the authors theorize corporate response to OFDI policies as firm dependence on home governments. They argue that such dependence differentially affects firm innovation through support and control mechanisms, and elucidate an inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate response to OFDI policies (measured by the percentage of a firm's OFDI projects in policy-favored markets) and innovation performance (measured as patent counts). Furthermore, this curvilinear relationship, they posit, is moderated and strengthened by home-government subsidies the firm receives (calculated as the ratio of annual subsidies received to yearly sales). The authors use archival data of 2,050 Chinese listed manufacturing firms responding to specific OFDI policies from 2013 to 2021 to corroborate their predictions. Overall, by illuminating the innovation implications of OFDI as a corporate response to policies, this study contributes to the international marketing literature in the context of emerging markets.
AhmedFarhad U.BrennanLouis (2019), “An Institution-Based View of Firms’ Early Internationalization,” International Marketing Review, 36 (6), 911–54.
2.
AndersonJohnSutherlandDylanSevereSean (2015), “An Event Study of Home and Host Country Patent Generation in Chinese MNEs Undertaking Strategic Asset Acquisitions in Developed Markets,” International Business Review, 24 (5), 758–71.
3.
ArchibugiDanielePlantaMario (1996), “Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Surveys,” Technovation, 16 (9), 451–519.
4.
ArellanoManuelBondStephen (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277–97.
5.
BehlAbhishekKambojShampySarmahBijoylaxmiPereiraVijaySharmaKirtiRammalHussain GulzarArrigoElisa (2023), “Customer Involvement and Servitization in Hybrid Offerings: Moderating Role of Digitalization and Co-Creation,” International Marketing Review, 40 (4), 739–73.
6.
BerronePascualFosfuriAndreaGelabertLilianaGomez-MejiaLuis R. (2013), “Necessity as the Mother of ‘Green’ Inventions: Institutional Pressures and Environmental Innovations,” Strategic Management Journal, 34 (8), 891–909.
7.
Bıçakcıoğlu-PeynirciNilayMorganRobert E. (2022), “Unbundling the Effects of Internationalization on Firm Performance in Emerging Economies: The Moderating Effects of Strategic Resource Decisions,” Journal of International Marketing, 30 (1), 55–74.
8.
BoatengAgyenimDuMinWangYanWangChengqiAhammadMohammad F. (2017), “Explaining the Surge in M&A as an Entry Mode: Home Country and Cultural Influences,” International Marketing Review, 34 (1), 87–108.
9.
BoeingPhilipp (2016), “The Allocation and Effectiveness of China’s R&D Subsidies–Evidence from Listed Firms,” Research Policy, 45 (9), 1774–89.
BuckleyPeter J. (2020), “China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization,” Journal of International Business Studies, 51 (2), 279–81.
12.
CertoS. TrevisBusenbarkJohn R.WooHyun-SooSemadeniMatthew (2016), “Sample Selection Bias and Heckman Models in Strategic Management Research,” Strategic Management Journal, 37 (13), 2639–57.
13.
Cuervo-CazurraAlvaroInkpenAndrewMusacchioAldoRamaswamyKannan (2014), “Governments as Owners: State-Owned Multinational Companies,” Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8), 919–42.
14.
Cuervo-CazurraAlvaroLiCheng (2021), “State Ownership and Internationalization: The Advantage and Disadvantage of Stateness,” Journal of World Business, 56 (1), 101112.
15.
CuiLinXuYing (2019), “Outward FDI and Profitability of Emerging Economy Firms: Diversifying from Home Resource Dependence in Early-Stage Internationalization,” Journal of World Business, 54 (4), 372–86.
16.
DiamantopoulosAdamantiosWinklhoferHeidi M. (2001), “Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 269–77.
17.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–60.
18.
DuanmuJing-Lin (2014), “State-Owned MNCs and Host Country Expropriation Risk: The Role of Home State Soft Power and Economic Gunboat Diplomacy,” Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8), 1044–60.
19.
FanPeilei (2011), “Innovation, Globalization, and Catch-Up of Latecomers: Cases of Chinese Telecom Firms,” Environment and Planning A, 43 (4), 830–49.
20.
FuXiaolanHouJunLiuXiaohui (2018), “Unpacking the Relationship Between Outward Direct Investment and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese Firms,” World Development, 102, 111–23.
21.
GanShaoningBiNuanHanXiuchengYanShiLiuJufang (2018), China Patent Investigation Report 2018. China National Intellectual Property Administration.
22.
GaurAjai S.MaXufeiDingZhujun (2018), “Home Country Supportiveness/Unfavorableness and Outward Foreign Direct Investment from China,” Journal of International Business Studies, 49 (3), 324–45.
23.
GrilichesZvi (1990), “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4), 1661–707.
24.
HaansRichard F.J.PietersConstantHeZi-Lin (2016), “Thinking About U: Theorizing and Testing U- and Inverted U-Shaped Relationships in Strategy Research,” Strategic Management Journal, 37 (7), 1177–95.
25.
HillmanAmy J.WithersMichael C.CollinsBrian J. (2009), “Resource Dependence Theory: A Review,” Journal of Management, 35 (6), 1404–27.
26.
HuangYuanyuanShenLuZhangChuang (2022), “Home-Country Government Support, the Belt and Road Initiative, and the Foreign Performance of Chinese State-Owned Subsidiaries,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39 (3), 1023–49.
27.
IurkovViacheslavKovalMariiaZaefarianGhasem (2023), “How Much Does Domestic Location Matter for B2B Firms’ Export Intensity? A Variance Decomposition Study,” Journal of International Marketing, 31 (4), 36–52.
28.
JiangHanLuoYadongXiaJunHittMichaelShenJia (2023), “Resource Dependence Theory in International Business: Progress and Prospects,” Global Strategy Journal, 13 (1), 3–57.
29.
JinJason LuZhouKevin ZhengWangYonggui (2016), “Exploitation and Exploration in International Joint Ventures: Moderating Effects of Partner Control Imbalance and Product Similarity,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (4), 20–38.
30.
JourdanJulienKivlenieceIlze (2017), “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Dual Effect of Public Sponsorship on Organizational Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 60 (1), 55–77.
31.
JuMinLu JinJasonZhouKevin Zheng (2018), “How Can International Ventures Utilize Marketing Capability in Emerging Markets? Its Contingent Effect on New Product Development,” Journal of International Marketing, 26 (4), 1–17.
32.
KafourosMario I.BuckleyPeter J.SharpJohn A.WangChengqi (2008), “The Role of Internationalization in Explaining Innovation Performance,” Technovation, 28 (1), 63–74.
33.
KrammerSorin M.S.JiménezAlfredo (2020), “Do Political Connections Matter for Firm Innovation? Evidence from Emerging Markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151 (4), 119669.
34.
LeeEun SuLiuWeiYangJing Yu (2023), “Neither Developed Nor Emerging: Dual Paths for Outward FDI and Home Country Innovation in Emerged Market MNCs,” International Business Review, 32 (2), 101925.
35.
LeeHannah SoobinGriffithDavid A. (2019), “The Balancing of Country-Based Interaction Orientation and Marketing Strategy Implementation Adaptation/Standardization for Profit Growth in Multinational Corporations,” Journal of International Marketing, 27 (2), 22–37.
36.
LeungFine F.TseCaleb H.YimChi Kin (2020), “Engaging Customer Cocreation in New Product Development Through Foreign Subsidiaries: Influences of Multinational Corporations’ Global Integration and Local Adaptation Mechanisms,” Journal of International Marketing, 28 (2), 59–80.
37.
LiJianStrangeRogerNingLutaoSutherlandDylan (2016), “Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Domestic Innovation Performance: Evidence from China,” International Business Review, 25 (5), 1010–19.
38.
LiJiataoLiuBinQianGongming (2019), “The Belt and Road Initiative, Cultural Friction and Ethnicity: Their Effects on the Export Performance of SMEs in China,” Journal of World Business, 54 (4), 350–59.
39.
LiJiataoVan AsscheAriLiLeeQianGongming (2022b), “Foreign Direct Investment Along the Belt and Road: A Political Economy Perspective,” Journal of International Business Studies, 53 (5), 902–19.
40.
LiJingMeyerKlaus E.ZhangHuaDingYuan (2018), “Diplomatic and Corporate Networks: Bridges to Foreign Locations,” Journal of International Business Studies, 49 (6), 659–83.
41.
LiJingShapiroDanielPengMike W.UfimtsevaAnastasia (2022a), “Corporate Diplomacy in the Age of U.S.–China Rivalry,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 36 (4), 1007–32.
42.
LiSiruiSuJingLiuYingLepechMichael D.WangJie (2021), “How ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative Implementation Has Influenced R&D Outcomes of Chinese Enterprises: Asset-Exploitation or Knowledge Transfer?” R&D Management, 51 (3), 273–92.
43.
LiuHaiyueManzoorAqsa (2020), “The Impact of OFDI on the Performance of Chinese Firms Along the ‘Belt and Road,’” Applied Economics, 52 (11), 1219–39.
44.
LiuHengJiangXuZhangJianqiZhaoXinglu (2013), “Strategic Flexibility and International Venturing by Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Effects of Institutional and Relational Factors,” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (2), 79–98.
45.
LuJiangyongLiuXiaohuiWangHongling (2011), “Motives for Outward FDI of Chinese Private Firms: Firm Resources, Industry Dynamics, and Government Policies,” Management and Organization Review, 7 (2), 223–48.
46.
LuJiangyongLiuXiaohuiWrightMikeFilatotchevIgor (2014), “International Experience and FDI Location Choices of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Effects of Home Country Government Support and Host Country Institutions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (4), 428–49.
47.
LuoYadongTungRosalie L. (2007), “International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises: A Springboard Perspective,” Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4), 481–98.
48.
LuoYadongXueQiuzhiHanBinjie (2010), “How Emerging Market Governments Promote Outward FDI: Experience from China,” Journal of World Business, 45 (1), 68–79.
49.
MohrAlexanderWangChengangFastosoFernando (2016), “The Contingent Effect of State Participation on the Dissolution of International Joint Ventures: A Resource Dependence Approach,” Journal of International Business Studies, 47 (4), 408–26.
50.
National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce (2015), Vision and Proposed Actions Outlined on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. State Council of China.
51.
NiuTengWangPeng (2024), “The Karmic Debt of Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Subnational Environmental Regulatory Pressure and Foreign Divestment from an Emerging Market,” Journal of International Marketing, 32 (2), 33–48.
52.
NjinyahSam Zisuh (2018), “The Effectiveness of Government Policies for Export Promotion on the Export Performance of SMEs Cocoa Exporters in Cameroon,” International Marketing Review, 35 (1), 164–85.
OliverChristine (1991), “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes,” Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145–79.
55.
OliverChristineHolzingerIngo (2008), “The Effectiveness of Strategic Political Management: A Dynamic Capabilities Framework,” Academy of Management Review, 33 (2), 496–520.
56.
PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald R. (2003), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, 2nd ed.Stanford University Press.
57.
PiperopoulosPanagiotisWuJieWangChengqi (2018), “Outward FDI, Location Choices and Innovation Performance of Emerging Market Enterprises,” Research Policy, 47 (1), 232–40.
58.
RongZhaoWuXiaokaiBoeingPhilipp (2017), “The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms,” Research Policy, 46 (9), 1533–51.
59.
SainamPreethikaBahadirS. Cem (2024), “Emerging Market Firms’ Internationalization Pricing Strategies: The Role of Country of Origin and Organizational Learning,” Journal of International Marketing, 32 (3), 5–22.
60.
ShafferBrian (1995), “Firm-Level Responses to Government Regulation: Theoretical and Research Approaches,” Journal of Management, 21 (3), 495–514.
61.
SharmaPiyushChengLouis T.W.LeungT.Y. (2020), “Impact of Political Connections on Chinese Export Firms’ Performance – Lessons for Other Emerging Markets,” Journal of Business Research, 106, 24–34.
62.
SharmaRevti RamanSrahaGloriaCrickDave (2018), “Export Promotion Programmes and the Export Performance of Ghanaian Firms,” International Marketing Review, 35 (4), 661–82.
63.
ShengMargaret L.HartmannNathaniel N.ChenQimeiChenIrene (2015), “The Synergetic Effect of Multinational Corporation Management's Social Cognitive Capability on Tacit-Knowledge Management: Product Innovation Ability Insights from Asia,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (2), 94–110.
64.
ShethJagdish N. (2011), “Impact of Emerging Markets on Marketing: Rethinking Existing Perspectives and Practices,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 166–82.
65.
SongMalinAiHongshanLiXie (2015), “Political Connections, Financing Constraints, and the Optimization of Innovation Efficiency among China's Private Enterprises,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 290–99.
66.
SteinbergPhilip J.UrbigDiemoProcherVivien D.VolkmannChristine (2021), “Knowledge Transfer and Home-Market Innovativeness: A Comparison of Emerging and Advanced Economy Multinationals,” Journal of International Management, 27 (4), 100873.
67.
SuchmanMark C. (1995), “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610.
68.
SunSunny LiLeeRuby P. (2013), “Enhancing Innovation Through International Joint Venture Portfolios: From the Emerging Firm Perspective,” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (3), 1–21.
69.
SutherlandDylanAndersonJohnBaileyNicholasAlonIlan (2020), “Policy, Institutional Fragility, and Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Examination of the Belt and Road Initiative,” Journal of International Business Policy, 3 (3), 249–72.
70.
TanQunSousaCarlos M.P. (2020), “Giving a Fish or Teaching to Fish? Exploring the Effects of Home-Country Governmental Support on Foreign Exit Decisions,” International Marketing Review, 37 (6), 1181–203.
71.
Thakur-WernzPoojaSamantShantala (2019), “Relationship Between International Experience and Innovation Performance: The Importance of Organizational Learning for EMNEs,” Global Strategy Journal, 9 (3), 378–404.
72.
WangChengqiPiperopoulosPanagiotisChenShihuaMingAlan Au KaiHerbertKendall (2022), “Outward FDI and Innovation Performance of Chinese Firms: Why Can Home-Grown Political Ties Be A Liability?” Journal of World Business, 57 (3), 101306.
73.
WangQingtaoLiuBin (2022), “State Equity and Outward FDI Under the Theme of Belt and Road Initiative,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39 (3), 877–97.
74.
WangYueqiGuoBinYinYanjie (2017), “Open Innovation Search in Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Organizational Slack and Absorptive Capacity,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 21 (3), 656–74.
75.
WangYueqiWangXuguangXuWanqiu (2023), “How Does Negative Performance Feedback Affect a Firm’s Openness in Its Innovation Search Behaviour? The Moderating Role of Organisational Slack,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35 (4), 380–93.
76.
WryTyler J.CobbAdamAldrichHoward E. (2013), “More Than a Metaphor: Assessing the Historical Legacy of Resource Dependence and its Contemporary Promise as a Theory of Environmental Complexity,” Academy of Management Annals, 7 (1), 441–88.
77.
WuXiaoboDuJianXuYueXuHongqiZhuShan (2022), “Unpacking the Impact of OFDI Speed and Rhythm on Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese Firms,” Management and Organization Review, 18 (5), 958–81.
78.
WuJieMaZhenzhongLiuZhiyang (2019), “The Moderated Mediating Effect of International Diversification, Technological Capability, and Market Orientation on Emerging Market Firms’ New Product Performance,” Journal of Business Research, 99, 524–33.
79.
WuJieParkSeung Ho (2019), “The Role of International Institutional Complexity on Emerging Market Multinational Companies’ Innovation,” Global Strategy Journal, 9 (2), 333–53.
XiaJunMaXufeiLuJane W.YiuDaphne W. (2014), “Outward Foreign Direct Investment by Emerging Market Firms: A Resource Dependence Logic,” Strategic Management Journal, 35 (9), 1343–63.
82.
XieZhenzhenLiJiatao (2018), “Exporting and Innovating Among Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Role of Institutional Development,” Journal of International Business Studies, 49 (2), 222–45.
YanZheng JosephZhuJiuhua CherrieFanDiKalfadellisPaul (2018), “An Institutional Work View Toward the Internationalization of Emerging Market Firms,” Journal of World Business, 53 (5), 682–94.
85.
YiJingtaoMurphreeMichaelMengShuangLiSali (2021), “The More the Merrier? Chinese Government R&D Subsidies, Dependence, and Firm Innovation Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38 (2), 289–310.
86.
ZhangHaisuShuChengliJiangXuMalterAlan J. (2010), “Managing Knowledge for Innovation: The Role of Cooperation, Competition, and Alliance Nationality,” Journal of International Marketing, 18 (4), 74–94.
87.
ZhangYamengZhanWuXuYekunKumarVikas (2020), “International Friendship Cities, Regional Government Leaders, and Outward Foreign Direct Investment from China,” Journal of Business Research, 108, 105–18.
88.
ZhaoShashaLiuXiaohuiAnderssonUlfShenkarOded (2021), “Knowledge Management of Emerging Economy Multinationals,” Journal of World Business, 57 (1), 101255.
89.
ZhouKevin ZhengGaoGerald YongZhaoHongxin (2017), “State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 62 (2), 375–404.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
