Although prior research is congested with constructs intended to capture consumers’ dispositions toward globalization and global/local products, their effects appear to replicate with difficulty, and little is known about the underlying theoretical mechanisms. This investigation revisits the relationship between prominent consumer dispositions (consumer ethnocentrism, cosmopolitanism, global/local identity, globalization attitude) and perceived brand globalness as determinants of consumer responses to global brands. Drawing on selective perception and social identity theories, the authors consider several theory-based model specifications that reflect alternative mechanisms through which key consumer dispositions relate to brand globalness and affect important brand-related outcomes. By employing a flexible model that simultaneously accounts for moderating, mediating, conditional, and direct effects, we empirically test these rival model specifications. A meta-analysis of 264 effect sizes obtained from 13 studies with 23 unique data sets and a total sample of 1,410 consumers raises concerns regarding the (potentially overstated) utility of consumer dispositions for explaining consumer responses to global brands. It also reveals a need for further conceptual contemplation of their function in international consumer research and managerial practice.
AakerDavid A.JoachimsthalerEric (1999), “The Lure of Global Branding,” Harvard Business Review, 77 (6), 137–44.
2.
AkakaMelissa A.AldenDana L. (2010), “Global Brand Positioning and Perceptions,” International Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 37–56.
3.
AkramAneelaMerunkaDwightAkramShakaib M. (2011), “Perceived Brand Globalness in Emerging Markets and the Moderating Role of Consumer Ethnocentrism,” International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6 (4), 291–303.
4.
AldenDana L.KelleyJames B.RieflerPetraLeeJulie A.SoutarGeoffrey N. (2013), “The Effect of Global Company Animosity on Global Brand Attitudes in Emerging and Developed Markets: Does Perceived Value Matter?” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (2), 17–38.
5.
AldenDana L.SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M.BatraRajeev (1999), “Brand Positioning Through Advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The Role of Global Consumer Culture,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (1), 75–87.
6.
AldenDana L.SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.BatraRajeev (2006), “Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketplace Globalization: Structure, Antecedents, and Consequences,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (3), 227–39.
7.
AneshenselCarol S. (2013), Theory-Based Data Analysis for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
8.
BalabanisGeorgeDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2004), “Domestic Country Bias, Country-of-Origin Effects, and Consumer Ethnocentrism: A Multidimensional Unfolding Approach,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (1), 80–95.
9.
BartikowskiBorisClevelandMark (2017), “Seeing is Being: Consumer Culture and the Positioning of Premium Cars in China,” Journal of Business Research, 77 (8), 195–202.
10.
BartschFabianDiamantopoulosAdamantiosPaparoidamisNicholas G.ChumpitazRuben (2016), “Global Brand Ownership: The Mediating Roles of Consumer Attitudes and Brand Identification,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (9), 3629–35.
11.
BartschFabianRieflerPetraDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2016), “A Taxonomy and Review of Positive Consumer Dispositions Toward Foreign Countries and Globalization,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (1), 82–110.
12.
BatraRajeevRamaswamyVenkatramAldenDana L.SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.RamachanderS. (2000), “Effects of Brand Local and Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Countries,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9 (2), 83–95.
13.
BehlingOrlandoLawKenneth S. (2000), Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments: Problems and Solutions, Vol. 133. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
14.
ChabowskiBrian R.SamieeSaeedHultG. Tomas M. (2013), “A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Branding Literature and a Research Agenda,” Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (6), 622–34.
15.
ClevelandMarkLarocheMichelPapadopoulosNicolas (2009), “Cosmopolitanism, Consumer Ethnocentrism, and Materialism: An Eight-Country Study of Antecedents and Outcomes,” Journal of International Marketing, 17 (1), 116–46.
16.
ClevelandMarkPapadopoulosNicolasLarocheMichel (2011), “Identity, Demographics, and Consumer Behaviors: International Market Segmentation Across Product Categories,” International Marketing Review, 28 (3), 244–66.
17.
CombsJames G. (2010), “Big Samples and Small Effects: Let’s Not Trade Relevance and Rigor for Power,” Academy of Management Journal, 53 (1), 9–13.
18.
D’LimaGabrielle M.PearsonMatthew R.KelleyMichelle L. (2012), “Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Mediator and Moderator of the Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Alcohol-Related Consequences in First-Year College Students,” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26 (2), 330–37.
19.
DavvetasVasileiosDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2016), “How Product Category Shapes Preferences Toward Global and Local Brands: A Schema Theory Perspective,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (4), 61–81.
20.
DavvetasVasileiosHalkiasGeorgios (2019), “Global and Local Brand Stereotypes: Formation, Content Transfer, and Impact,”International Marketing Review36 (5), 675–701.
21.
DavvetasVasileiosSichtmannChristinaDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2015), “The Impact of Perceived Brand Globalness on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32 (4), 431–34.
22.
DeMeulenaerSarahDensNathalieDe PelsmackerPatrick (2015), “Which Cues Cause Consumers to Perceive Brands as More Global? A Conjoint Analysis,” International Marketing Review, 32 (6), 606–26.
23.
DimofteClaudiu V. (2010), “Implicit Measures of Consumer Cognition: A Review,” Psychology and Marketing, 27 (10), 921–37.
24.
DimofteClaudiu VJohanssonJohny K.RonkainenIlkka A. (2008), “Cognitive and Affective Reactions of U.S. Consumers to Global Brands,” Journal of International Marketing, 16 (4), 113–35.
25.
DriverJon (2001), “A Selective Review of Selective Attention Research from the Past Century,” British Journal of Psychology, 92 (1), 53–78.
26.
FazioRussell H.OlsonMichael A. (2003), “Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use,” Annual Review of Psychology, 54 (1), 297–327.
27.
GaoHuachaoZhangYinlongMittalVikas (2017), “How Does Local–Global Identity Affect Price Sensitivity?” Journal of Marketing, 81 (3), 62–79.
28.
GodinGastonArianeBélanger-GravelNolinBertrand (2008), “Mechanism by Which BMI Influences Leisure-Time Physical Activity Behavior,” Obesity, 16 (6), 1314–17.
29.
GrayHeather M.AmbadyNaliniLowenthalWilliam T.DeldinPatricia (2004), “P300 as an Index of Attention to Self-Relevant Stimuli,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (2), 216–24.
30.
GreenwaldAnthony G.BanajiMahzarin R. (1995), “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes,” Psychological Review, 102 (1), 4–27.
31.
GreenwaldAnthony GMcGheeDebbie E.SchwartzJordan L. (1998), “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (6), 1464–80.
32.
GuoXiaoling (2013), “Living in a Global World: Influence of Consumer Global Orientation on Attitudes Toward Global Brands from Developed Versus Emerging Countries,” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (1), 1–22.
33.
Gürhan-CanliZeynepSarıal-AbiGülenHayranCeren (2018), “Consumers and Brands Across the Globe: Research Synthesis and New Directions,” Journal of International Marketing, 26 (1), 96–117.
34.
GygliSavinaHaelgFlorianPotrafkeNiklasSturmJan-Egbert (2019), “The KOF Globalisation Index – Revisited,” Review of International Organizations, 14 (3), 543–74.
35.
HairJoseph F.BlackWilliam. C.BabinBarry J.AndersonRolph E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
HalkiasGeorgiosDavvetasVasileiosDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2016), “The Interplay Between Country Stereotypes and Perceived Brand Globalness/Localness as Drivers of Brand Preference,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (9), 3621–28.
37.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
38.
HayesAndrew F. (2015), “An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50 (1), 1–22.
39.
HoltDouglas B. (1997), “Poststructuralist Lifestyle Analysis: Conceptualizing the Social Patterning of Consumption in Postmodernity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (4), 326–50.
40.
HoltDouglas B. (1998), “Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 1–25.
41.
HoltonRobert (2000), “Globalization’s Cultural Consequences,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570 (1), 140–52.
42.
KolblŽivaArslanagić-KalajdžićMajaDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2018), “Stereotyping Global Brands: Is Warmth More Important Than Competence?”Journal of Business Researchforthcoming, DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.060.
MacKenzieScott B.PodsakoffPhilip M. (2012), “Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies,” Journal of Retailing, 88 (4), 542–55.
45.
MagnussonPeterWestjohnStanford A.ZdravkovicSrdan (2015), “An Examination of the Interplay Between Corporate Social Responsibility, the Brand’s Home Country, and Consumer Global Identification,” International Marketing Review, 32 (6), 663–85.
46.
MandlerTimo (2019), “Beyond Reach: An Extended Model of Global Brand Effects,” International Marketing Review, 36 (5), 647–74.
47.
McGuireWilliam J. (1976), “Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (4), 302–19.
48.
McShaneBlakeley B.BöckenholtUlf (2017), “Single-Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits for Study Summary, Theory Testing, and Replicability,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 1048–63.
49.
MittalBanwariLeeMyung-Soo (1989), “A Causal Model of Consumer Involvement,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 10 (3), 363–89.
50.
MonetaGiovanni B. (2011), “Metacognition, Emotion, and Alcohol Dependence in College Students: A Moderated Mediation Model,” Addictive Behaviors, 36 (7), 781–84.
51.
NgSharonHoustonMichael J. (2006), “Exemplars or Beliefs? The Impact of Self-View on the Nature and Relative Influence of Brand Associations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (4), 519–29.
52.
OeiNicole Y. L.TollenaarMarieke S.ElzingaBernet M.SpinhovenPhilip (2010), “Propranolol Reduces Emotional Distraction in Working Memory: A Partial Mediating Role of Propranolol-Induced Cortisol Increases?” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 93 (3), 388–95.
53.
ÖzsomerAyşegu¨l (2012), “The Interplay Between Global and Local Brands: A Closer Look at Perceived Brand Globalness and Local Iconness,” Journal of International Marketing, 20 (2), 72–95.
54.
ÖzsomerAyşegu¨lAltarasSelin (2008), “Global Brand Purchase Likelihood: A Critical Synthesis and an Integrated Conceptual Framework,” Journal of International Marketing, 16 (4), 1–28.
55.
ÖzsomerAyşegu¨lBatraRajeevChattopadhyayAmitavaHofstedeFrenkel ter (2012), “A Global Brand Management Roadmap,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (1), 1–4.
56.
Pérez-EdgarKoralyBar-HaimYairMcDermottJennifer M.Chronis-TuscanoAndreaPineDaniel S.FoxNathan A. (2010), “Attention Biases to Threat and Behavioral Inhibition in Early Childhood Shape Adolescent Social Withdrawal,” Emotion, 10 (3), 349–57.
57.
PodsakoffPhilip M.MacKenzieScott B.PodsakoffNathan P. (2012), “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It,” Annual Review of Psychology, 63 (1), 539–69.
58.
PostmanLeoBrunerJerome S.McGinniesElliott (1948), “Personal Values as Selective Factors in Perception,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43 (2), 142–54.
59.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S. (2002), Hierarchical Linear Models: Application and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
60.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.CheongYuk FaiCongdonRichard T.Jrdu ToitMathilda (2016), HLM7 Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling User Manual: User Guide for Scientific Software International’s (S.S.I.) Program. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
61.
ReedAmericusForehandMark R.PuntoniStefanoWarlopLuk (2012), “Identity-Based Consumer Behavior,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (4), 310–21.
62.
RieflerPetra (2012), “Why Consumers Do (Not) Like Global Brands: The Role of Globalization Attitude, GCO and Global Brand Origin,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (1), 25–34.
63.
RieflerPetraDiamantopoulosAdamantiosSiguawJudy A. (2012), “Cosmopolitan Consumers as a Target Group for Segmentation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3), 285–305.
64.
RosenthalRobert (1979), “The ‘File Drawer Problem’ and Tolerance for Null Results,” Psychological Bulletin, 86 (3), 638–41.
65.
RussoJ. EdwardMeloyMargaret G.MedvecVictoria Husted (1998), “Predecisional Distortion of Product Information,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (4), 438–52.
66.
ShankarmaheshMahesh N. (2006), “Consumer Ethnocentrism: An Integrative Review of its Antecedents and Consequences,” International Marketing Review, 23 (2), 146–72.
67.
SharmaPiyush (2015), “Consumer Ethnocentrism: Reconceptualization and Cross-Cultural Validation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (3), 381–89.
68.
ShimpTerence A.SharmaSubhash (1987), “Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (3), 280–89.
69.
SiamagkaNikoletta-TheofaniaBalabanisGeorge (2015), “Revisiting Consumer Ethnocentrism: Review, Reconceptualization, and Empirical Testing,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (3), 66–86.
70.
SpearsMartha C.ParkerDarrell F.McDonaldMichael (2004), “Globalization Attitudes and Locus of Control,” Journal of Global Business, 15 (29), 57–66.
71.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M. (2019), “Global Versus Local Consumer Culture: Theory, Measurement, and Future Research Directions,” Journal of International Marketing, 27 (1), 1–19.
72.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.JongMartijn G. de (2010), “A Global Investigation into the Constellation of Consumer Attitudes Toward Global and Local Products,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (6), 18–40.
73.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.BatraRajeevAldenDana L. (2003), “How Perceived Brand Globalness Creates Brand Value,” Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (1), 53–65.
74.
StrizhakovaYuliyaCoulterRobin A. (2015), “Drivers of Local Relative to Global Brand Purchases: A Contingency Approach,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (1), 1–22.
75.
SwobodaBernhardHirschmannJohannes (2016), “Does Being Perceived as Global Pay Off? An Analysis of Leading Foreign and Domestic Multinational Corporations in India, Japan, and the United States,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (3), 1–30.
76.
SwobodaBernhardPennemannKarinTaubeMarkus (2012), “The Effects of Perceived Brand Globalness and Perceived Brand Localness in China: Empirical Evidence on Western, Asian, and Domestic Retailers,” Journal of International Marketing, 20 (4), 72–95.
77.
TajfelHenri (1974), “Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior,” Social Science Information, 13 (2), 65–93.
78.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C. (1986), “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed, WorchelStephenAustinWilliam G., eds. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 7–24.
79.
TuLingjiangKhareAdwaitZhangYinlong (2012), “A Short 8-Item Scale for Measuring Consumers’ Local–Global Identity,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (1), 35–42.
80.
WestjohnStanford A.SinghNitishMagnussonPeter (2012), “Responsiveness to Global and Local Consumer Culture Positioning: A Personality and Collective Identity Perspective,” Journal of International Marketing, 20 (1), 58–73.
81.
WiedemannAmelie U.SchüzBenjaminSniehottaFalcoScholzUrteSchwarzerRalf (2009), “Disentangling the Relation Between Intentions, Planning, and Behaviour: A Moderated Mediation Analysis,” Psychology and Health, 24 (1), 67–79.
82.
WinitWaratGregoryGaryClevelandMarkVerleghPeeter (2014), “Global vs. Local Brands: How Home Country Bias and Price Differences Impact Brand Evaluations,” International Marketing Review, 31 (2), 102–28.
83.
XieYiBatraRajeevPengSiqing (2015), “An Extended Model of Preference Formation Between Global and Local Brands: The Role of Identity Expressiveness, Trust, and Affect,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (1), 50–71.
84.
YoonSung-JoonCannonHugh M.YaprakAttila (1996), “Evaluating the CYMYC Cosmopolitanism Scale on Korean Consumers,” Advances in International Marketing, 7, 211–32.
85.
Zellmer-BruhnMaryCaligiuriPaulaThomasDavid C. (2016), “From the Editors: Experimental Designs in International Business Research,” Journal of International Business Studies, 47 (4), 399–407.
86.
Zeugner-RothKatharina P.ZabkarVesnaDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2015), “Consumer Ethnocentrism, National Identity, and Consumer Cosmopolitanism as Drivers of Consumer Behavior: A Social Identity Theory Perspective,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (2), 25–54.
87.
ZhangYinlongKhareAdwait (2009), “The Impact of Accessible Identities on the Evaluation of Global Versus Local Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 524–37.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
