Human beings have always coveted beautiful objects, but the desire to look good is reaching new heights worldwide. Although the pursuit of beauty appears universal, industry evidence suggests that it is particularly strong in Asia. This research examines the effect of culture on the pursuit of beauty. Three studies provide converging evidence that interdependent self-construal increases the likelihood of using appearance-enhancing products. Study 1 operationalizes culture through nationality and self-construal and shows that Easterners (more interdependent) are more likely to use appearance-enhancing products than Westerners (less interdependent). This use is driven by interdependents’ tendency to conform to societal norms, which in turn leads to heightened self-discrepancy (Study 2). The use of appearance-enhancing tools helps minimize this discrepancy. Study 3 shows that strength of norms moderates the impact of interdependence on the use of appearance-enhancing tools. When norms are loosely defined and adherence is not strictly enforced, interdependents’ appearance enhancement tendency is reduced. This research offers actionable insights into the pursuit of beauty, marketing of beauty brands, policy making, and consumer well-being.
AgarwalJamesMalhotraNaresh K.BoltonRuth N. (2010), “A Cross-National and Cross-Cultural Approach to Global Market Segmentation: An Application Using Consumers’ Perceived Service Quality,” Journal of International Marketing, 18 (3), 18–40.
2.
AhluwaliaRohini (2008), “How Far Can a Brand Stretch? Understanding the Role of Self-Construal,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (3), 337–50.
3.
AhuviaAaronWongNancy (1998), “The Effect of Cultural Orientation in Luxury Consumption,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, ArnouldEric J.ScottL. M., eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 29–32.
4.
BannerLois W. (1983), American Beauty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BelmiPeterNealeMargaret (2014), “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Who’s the Fairest of Them All? Thinking That One Is Attractive Increases the Tendency to Support Inequality,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124 (2), 133–49.
6.
BondRodSmithPeter B. (1996), “Culture and Conformity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task,” Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 111–37.
7.
CashThomas F.SzymanskiMarcela L. (1995), “The Development and Validation of the Body-Image Ideals Questionnaire,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 65 (3), 466–77.
8.
ChanDarius K.-S. (1996), “Tightness-Looseness Revisited: Some Preliminary Analyses in Japan and the United States,” International Journal of Psychology, 31 (1), 1–12.
9.
ChanRicky Y. K.LauLorett B. Y. (2002), “Explaining Green Purchasing Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Study on American and Chinese Consumers,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(2/3), 9–40.
10.
ChelminskiPiotrCoulterRobin A. (2007), “The Effects of Cultural Individualism and Self-confidence on Propensity to Voice: From Theory to Measurement to Practice,” Journal of International Marketing, 15 (4), 94–118.
11.
ChoiJungsilChangYoung KyunLiYexin JessicaJangMyoung Gyun (2016), “Doing Good in Another Neighborhood: Attributions of CSR Motivations Depend on Corporate Nationality and Cultural Orientation,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (4), 82–102.
12.
ClarkeLaura HurdGriffinMeridith (2008), “Visible and Invisible Ageing: Beauty Work as a Response to Ageism,” Ageing and Society, 28 (5), 653–74.
13.
CliffordMargaret M.WalsterElaine (1973), “The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations,” Sociology of Education, 46 (2), 248–58.
14.
CrockerJenniferParkLora E. (2004), “The Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem,” Psychological Bulletin, 130 (3), 392–414.
15.
CrossSusan E. (1995), “Self-Construals, Coping, and Stress in Cross-Cultural Adaptation,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26 (6), 673–97.
16.
CunninghamMichael R.RobertsAlan R.BarbeeAnita P.DruenPerri B.WuCheng-Huan (1995), “Their Ideas of Beauty Are, on the Whole, the Same as Ours: Consistency and Variability in the Cross-Cultural Perception of Female Physical Attractiveness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (2), 261–79.
17.
DavisDawnavan S.SbroccoTracyOdoms-YoungAngelaSmithDionne M. (2010), “Attractiveness in African American and Caucasian Women: Is Beauty in the Eyes of the Observer?” Eating Behaviors, 11 (1), 25–32.
18.
DipboyeRobert L.FromkinHoward L.WibackKent (1975), “Relative Importance of Applicant Sex, Attractiveness, and Scholastic Standing in Evaluation of Job Applicant Resumes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (1), 39–43.
19.
DionKarenBerscheidEllenWalsterElaine (1972), “What Is Beautiful Is Good,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 (3), 285–90.
20.
EnglisBasil G.SolomonMichael R.AshmoreRichard D. (1994), “Beauty Before the Eyes of Beholders: The Cultural Encoding of Beauty Types in Magazine Advertising and Music Television,” Journal of Advertising, 23 (2), 49–64.
21.
EscalasJennifer E.BettmanJames R. (2005), “Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 378–89.
22.
Euromonitor (2013), “Size of Skincare Market Across Countries from 2005-2011,” http://www.euromonitor.com.
FisherRobert J.MaYu (2014), “The Price of Being Beautiful: Negative Effects of Attractiveness on Empathy for Children in Need,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (2), 436–50.
25.
FredricksonBarbara L.RobertsTomi-Ann (1997), “Objectification Theory,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21 (2), 173–206.
26.
FrostPeter (2005), Fair Women, Dark Men: The Forgotten Roots of Color Prejudice. Christchurch, NZ: Cybereditions.
GardnerWendi L.GabrielShiraLeeAngela Y. (1999), “‘I’ Value Freedom, but ‘We’ Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment,” Psychological Science, 10 (4), 321–26.
29.
GelfandMichele J.NishiiLisa H.RaverJana L. (2006), “On the Nature and Importance of Cultural Tightness-Looseness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (6), 1225–44.
30.
GelfandMichele J.RaverJana L.NishiiLisa H.LeslieLisa M.LunJanettaLimBeng ChongDuanLiliAlmaliachAssafAngSoonArnadottirJakobina. (2011), “Differences Between Tight and Loose cultures: A 33-Nation Study,” Science, 332 (6033), 1100–04.
31.
GudykunstWilliam B.MatsumotoYukoTing-ToomeyStellaNishidaTsukasaKimKwangsuHeymanSam (1996), “The Influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles Across Cultures,” Human Communication Research, 22 (4), 510–43.
32.
HalliwellEmmaDittmarHelga (2004), “Does Size Matter? The Impact of Model’s Body Size on Women’s Body-Focused Anxiety and Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23 (1), 104–22.
33.
HamermeshDaniel (2011), Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People are More Successful. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
HannoverBettinaKuhnenUlrich (2004), “Culture, Context, and Cognition: The Semantic Procedural Interface Model of the Self,” European Review of Social Psychology, 15 (1), 297–333.
35.
HayesAndrew F. (2012), “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling,” http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
36.
HeineSteven J.KitayamaShinobuLehmanDarrin R.TakataToshitakeIdeEugeneLeungCeciliaMatsumotoHisaya (2001), “Divergent Consequences of Success and Failure in Japan and North America: An Investigation of Self-Improving Motivations and Malleable Selves,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (4), 599–615.
37.
HeineSteven J.LehmanDarrin R. (1999), “Culture, Self-Discrepancies, and Self-Satisfaction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (8), 915–25.
38.
HigginsTory E. (1987), “Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect,” Psychological Review, 94 (3), 319–40.
39.
HillSarah E.RodehefferChristopher D.GriskeviciusVladasDuranteKristinaWhiteAndrew Edward (2012), “Boosting Beauty in an Economic Decline: Mating, Spending, and the Lipstick Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (2), 275–91.
40.
HofstedeGeert H. (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
HofstedeGeert H. (1991), “Cultures and Organizations: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival.” Software of the Mind. London, UK: McGraw Hill.
42.
HoppnerJessica J.GriffithDavid A.WhyteRyan C. (2015), “Reciprocity in Relationship Marketing: A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Effects of Equivalence and Immediacy on Relationship Quality and Satisfaction with Performance,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (4), 64–83.
HuiC. Harry (1988), “Measurement of Individualism-Collectivism,” Journal of Research in Personality, 22 (1), 17–36.
46.
HuiMichael K.HoCandy K. Y.WanLisa C. (2011), “Prior Relationships and Consumer Responses to Service Failures: A Cross-Cultural Study,” Journal of International Marketing, 19 (1), 59–81.
47.
InglehartRonald (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
JiLi-JunPengKaipingNisbettRichard E. (2000), “Culture, Control, and Perception of Relationships in the Environment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (5), 943–55.
50.
JungJaeheeLeeSeung-Hee (2006), “Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Appearance Self-Schema, Body Image, Self-Esteem and Dieting Behavior Between Korean and U.S. Women,” Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 34 (4), 350–65.
51.
KanazawaSatoshiKovarJody L. (2004), “Why Beautiful People Are More Intelligent,” Intelligence, 32 (3), 227–43.
52.
KimHeejungMarkusHazel R. (2004), “Deviance or Uniqueness, Harmony or Conformity? A Cultural Analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (4), 785–800.
53.
KimKyungilMarkmanArthur B. (2006), “Differences in Fear of Isolation as an Explanation of Cultural Differences: Evidence from Memory and Reasoning,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (3), 350–64.
54.
KimSi YeonYoungSeok SeoKeunYoung Bae (2014), “Face Consciousness Among South Korean Women: A Culture-Specific Extension of Objectification Theory,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61 (1), 24–36.
55.
KirkmanBradley L.LoweKevin B.GibsonCristina B. (2006), “A Quarter Century of ‘Culture’s Consequences’: A Review of Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Framework,” Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (3), 285–320.
56.
KwanSamanthaTrautnerMary N. (2009), “Beauty Work: Individual and Institutional Rewards, the Reproduction of Gender, and Questions of Agency,” Sociology Compass, 3(1), 49–71.
57.
LalwaniAshok K.ShavittSharon (2013), “You Get What You Pay for? Self-Construal Influences Price-Quality Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 255–67.
58.
LarocheMichelKalamasMariaClevelandMark (2005), “‘I’ Versus ‘We’: How Individualists and Collectivists Use Information Sources to Formulate Their Service Expectations,” International Marketing Review, 22 (3), 279–308.
59.
LascuDana-NicoletaZinkhanGeorge (1999), “Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications for Marketing Theory and Practice,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (3), 1–12.
60.
LeeAngela Y.AakerJennifer L.GardnerWendi L. (2000), “The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-Construals: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (6), 1122–34.
61.
LeeJaehoonShrumL. J. (2012), “Conspicuous Consumption Versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 530–44.
62.
LennoxRichard D.WolfeRaymond N. (1984), “Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (6), 1349–64.
LiEricMinHyun JeongBelkRussell W. (2008) “Skin Lightening and Beauty in Four Asian Cultures,” ACR North American Advances, 35, 444–49.
65.
LiHanZhangZhiBhattGiraYumYoung-Ok (2006), “Rethinking Culture and Self-Construal: China as a Middle Land,” Journal of Social Psychology, 146 (5), 591–610.
66.
LiRenGordonSarahGelfandMichele J. (2017), “Tightness–Looseness: A New Framework to Understand Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (3), 377–91.
MadanShilpaBasuShankhaLimElisonNgSharon (2017) “The Appeal of Beauty and Physical Attractiveness: An Indian Perspective,” in Perspectives on Indian Consumers, MaheswaranDurairajPuliyelThomas, eds. Mumbai, India: Oxford University Press.
69.
MandelNaomiRuckerDerekLevavJonathanGalinskyAdam D. (2017), “The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How Self-Discrepancies Drive Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (1), 133–46.
70.
ManraiLalita A.LascuDana-NicoletaManraiAjay K.BabbHarold W. (2001), “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Style in Eastern European Emerging Markets,” International Marketing Review, 18 (3), 270–85.
71.
MarkeyCharlotte N.MarkeyPatrick M. (2012), “Emerging Adults’ Responses to a Media Presentation of Idealized Female Beauty: An Examination of Cosmetic Surgery in Reality Television,” Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1 (4), 209–19.
72.
MarkusHazel R.KitayamaShinobu (1991), “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation,” Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224–53.
73.
MehrabianAlbertSteflCatherine A. (1995), “Basic Temperament Components of Loneliness, Shyness, and Conformity,” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 23 (3), 253–63.
74.
MilkieMelissa A. (1999), “Social Comparisons, Reflected Appraisals, and Mass Media: The Impact of Pervasive Beauty Images on Black and White Girls’ Self-Concepts,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 62 (2), 190–210.
75.
MorgesonForrest V.IIISharmaPratyush NidhiHultG. Tomas M. (2015), “Cross-National Differences in Consumer Satisfaction: Mobile Services and Developed Markets,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (2), 1–24.
76.
MowenJohn C.LongoriaAdelinaSalleeAmy (2009), “Burning and Cutting: Identifying the Traits of Individuals with an Enduring Propensity to Tan and to Undergo Cosmetic Surgery,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8 (5), 238–51.
77.
OysermanDaphnaCoonHeather M.KemmelmeierMarkus (2002), “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses,” Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1), 3–72.
78.
ParkCheolJunJong-Kun (2003), “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Internet Buying Behavior: Effects of Internet Usage, Perceived Risks, and Innovativeness,” International Marketing Review, 20 (5), 534–53.
79.
RhodeDeborah (2010), The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
RoseGregory M.ShohamAvivKahleLynn R.BatraRajeev (1994), “Social Values, Conformity, and Dress,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(17), 1501–19.
81.
RubensteinAdam J.KalakanisLisaLangloisJudith H. (1999), “Infant Preferences for Attractive Faces: A Cognitive Explanation,” Developmental Psychology, 35 (3), 848–55.
82.
SampsonEdward E. (2001), “Reinterpreting Individualism and Collectivism: Their Religious Roots and Monologic Versus Dialogic Person-Other Relationship,” American Psychologist, 55 (12), 1425–32.
83.
SavaniKrishnaWadhwaMonicaUchidaYukikoDingYuNaiduN. V. R. (2015), “When Norms Loom Larger Than the Self: Susceptibility of Preference–Choice Consistency to Normative Influence Across Cultures,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129 (July), 70–79.
84.
ShaikhShayanMalikAneelaAkramM.S.ChakrabartiRonika (2017), “Do Luxury Brands Successfully Entice Consumers? The Role of Bandwagon Effect,” International Marketing Review, 34 (4), 498–513.
85.
SingelisTheodore M. (1994), “The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (5), 580–91.
86.
StaffordMarla Royne (1998), “Advertising Sex-Typed Services: The Effects of Sex, Service Type, and Employee Type on Consumer Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising, 27 (2), 65–82.
87.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M. (2001), “The Role of National Culture in International Marketing Research,” International Marketing Review, 18 (1), 30–44.
88.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.BaumgartnerHans (1998), “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 78–90.
89.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.HofstedeFrenkel terWedelMichel (1999), “A Cross-National Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 55–69.
90.
ThompsonFrauke M.ChmuraThorsten (2015), “Loyalty Programs in Emerging and Developed Markets: The Impact of Cultural Values on Loyalty Program Choice,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (3), 87–103.
91.
TorelliCarlos (2006), “Individuality or Conformity? The Effect of Independent and Interdependent Self-Concepts on Public Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (3), 240–48.
92.
TorelliCarlos J.RodasMaría A. (2017), “Tightness–Looseness: Implications for Consumer and Branding Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (3), 398–404.
93.
TrafimowDavidTriandisHarry C.GotoSharon G. (1991), “Some Tests of the Distinction Between the Private Self and the Collective Self,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (5), 649–55.
94.
TriandisHarry C. (1995), Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
95.
UdryJ. RichardEcklandBruce K. (1984), “Benefits of Being Attractive: Differential Payoffs for Men and Women,” Psychological Reports, 54 (1), 47–56.
WestjohnStanford A.RoschkHolgerMagnussonPeter (2017), “Eastern Versus Western Culture Pricing Strategy: Superstition, Lucky Numbers, and Localization,” Journal of International Marketing, 25 (1), 72–90.
WongNancyAhuviaAaron (1998), “Personal Taste and Family Face: Luxury Consumption in Confucian and Western Societies,” Psychology & Marketing, 15 (5), 423–41.
YbarraOscarTrafimowDavid (1998), “How Priming the Private Self or Collective Self Affects the Relative Weights of Attitudes and Subjective Norms,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24 (4), 362–70.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
