Abstract
While screening has improved early detection of primary breast cancers, it may also identify metastasis to the breast in rare instances. High-grade carcinomas identified on breast screening may have non-specific morphology and immunoprofiles, making distinction from metastasis problematic. High-grade carcinomas frequently lose expression of specific tumor markers. New evidence specifically challenges GATA3/PAX8 exclusivity in the differential diagnosis of high-grade triple-negative breast cancer and high-grade serous carcinoma of müllerian origin. This case series provides a careful and detailed review of immunohistochemistry interpretation, with focus on PAX8, and the potential pitfalls in making a definitive pathological diagnosis, which is essential in determining oncological treatment options.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
